Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice
  4. Volume 6, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2057-0384
  • E-ISSN: 2057-0392

Abstract

Some argue that the tendency to ignore the self as an aspect of the relationship between architects and their drawings is a consequence of the hegemony of digital modes of representation, others that it is inherent to traditional perspectival and projective techniques. It is in this repressive context that architects struggle to consider their subjectivity in relation to the drawings they produce. This article aims to divert this subjective distance by proposing a method for revealing the unconscious forces that abide between architects and architectural drawings. Through a comparative analysis of this intermediate space with the psychoanalyst Donald Winnicott’s theory of the Transitional Object, the author considers his own relationship to perspective drawing and materializes this through the production of a drawing apparatus titled: the autobiographical hinge. Bilaterally, the conception of this drawing apparatus is founded on examples of visual art practice that challenge the repressive qualities of linear perspective, this includes the work of Penelope Haralambidou (2003); Lawrence Gowing (1965) and Marion Milner (1950). In a time of dissolved agency for the architect, this article presents a method through which to mine one’s own relationship to architectural drawing, through which a disturbance to those codified regimes occurs as a consequence of one’s own subjectivity being recognized.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00065_1
2021-12-01
2026-03-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, S.. ( 2009), Practice: Architecture, Technique + Representation, London and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alberti, L. B., and Spencer, J. R.. ( 1966), On Painting, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Burgoyne, B.. ( 2019), Drawing the Soul: Schemas and Models in Psychoanalysis, London:: Karnac;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Evans, R.,, Difford, R., and Middleton, R.. ( 1997), Robin Evans: Translations from Drawing to Building and Other Essays, London:: Architectural Association;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Milner, M.. ( 1950), On Not Being Able to Paint, London:: William Heinemann Ltd;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibson, J.. ( 1950), The Perception of the Visual World, Cambridge, Massachusetts:: Houghton Mifflin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Gombrich, E. H.. ( 1982), The Image and the Eye: Further Studies in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, Oxford:: Phaidon;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Haralambidou, P.. ( 2013), Marcel Duchamp and the Architecture of Desire, Abingdon, Oxon:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Hendrix, J. S.,, Hendrix, J. S., and Holm, L.. ( 2016), Architecture and the Unconscious, Abingdon, Oxon:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Holm, L.. ( 2007;), ‘ Vignettes of death: Architecture and the death drive. ’, Critical Quarterly, 49:3, pp. 31–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Pepperell, R., and Hughes, L.. ( 2015;), ‘ As seen: Modern British painting and visual experience. ’, Tate Papers, 23, https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/23/as-seen-modern-british-painting-and-visual-experience. Accessed 21 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Pérez Gómez, A., and Pelletier, L.. ( 1997), Architectural Representation and the Perspective Hinge, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Rendell, J.. ( 2017), The Architecture of Psychoanalysis: Spaces of Transition, London:: I. B. Tauris;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Schinaia, C.. ( 2019), Psychoanalysis and Architecture: The Inside and the Outside, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Winnicott, D. W.. ( 1971), Playing and Reality, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Craig, James. ( 2021;), ‘ The Autobiographical Hinge: Revealing the self in architectural drawing. ’, Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice, 6:2, pp. 273–89, https://doi.org/10.1386/drtp_00065_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00065_1
Loading
The Autobiographical Hinge: Revealing the self in architectural drawing
Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice 6, 273 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/drtp_00065_1
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00065_1
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00065_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): architecture; autobiography; drawing; psychoanalysis; subjectivity; transitional object

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test