Volume 7, Issue 2

Abstract

Materials are a vital collaborator in building human and non-human worlds and yet are often cast as simply assistants or props in art practice. This project report looks at an experimental drawing exercise, which gives non-traditional drawing materials a crucial position in the drawing and mark-making discipline. This exercise is part of a larger methodology that seeks to give materiality a more central role in wider arts practice in order to bring individual material or object into a closer working relationship with the artist. Through such practices we can learn more about our material collaborates, from how matter reveals itself when used as a mark marker to how tacit and sensorial knowledge can be developed between material and artist. The drawing exercise, which is explored in this report, utilizes alternatives to the traditional tools of drawing practices (e.g. pens, pencils or brushes) to explore how material can be used as both illustrator and illustrated to develop a deeper relational knowledge of the materials which surround us. In recent theoretical, political and technological fields, through movements such as New Materialism, the role of materials in research is being re-examined and this report applies this call for a more collaborative relationship with the material world specifically to art and design pedagogies. This approach has the potential to transform our knowledge of specific materials through personal sensorial experience and an acknowledgement of material’s own vitality, and I have already witnessed something of the realization of this in my own practice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00090_1
2022-10-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barad, Karen. ( 2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway, , 2nd ed.., Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennet, Jane. ( 2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. ( 1988), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London:: The Athlone Press Ltd;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dolphijn, Rick, and van der Tuin, Iris. ( 2012), New Materialism Interviews and Cartographies: New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies, Open Humanities Press;, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/11515701.0001.001. Accessed September 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon, Alastair. ( 2020a), https://www.alastairjohngordon.com. Accessed 9 September 2020.
  6. Gordon, Alastair. ( 2020b;), interview. , Birmingham School of Art;, 2 November.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Harbisson, Neil., www.cyborgarts.com. Accessed 1 April 2022.
  8. Horn, Rebecca., www.rebecca-horn.de. Accessed 1 April 2022.
  9. Lange-Berndt, Petra. (ed.) ( 2015;), ‘ How to be complicit with materials. ’, in Materiality (Documents of Contemporary Art), London:: Co-published by Whitechapel Gallery and The MIT Press;, pp. 1220.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Latour, Bruno. ( [1991] 1993), We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Morris, Robert. ( 1968;), ‘ Anti form. ’, in Materiality (Documents of Contemporary Art, 2015), London:: The MIT Press;, pp. 4041.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Parmar, Bharti., www.bhartiparmar.com. Accessed 10 September 2020.
  13. Rübel, Dietmar. ( 2012;), ‘ Plasticity: An art history of the mutable. ’, in Materiality (Documents of Contemporary Art), London:: Whitechapel Gallery and The MIT Press;, pp. 4250.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Seers, Lindsay. ( 1995–2001;), ‘ Human camera (IMMA). ’, Lindsay Seers , http://lindsayseers.info/work. Accessed 17 January 2022.
  15. Seers, Lindsay. ( 2001–19;), ‘ Mouth camera (black bag). ’, Lindsay Seers , http://lindsayseers.info/work. Accessed 18 January 2022.
  16. Stengers, I.. ( 2015), In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarism, Open Humanities Press in collaboration with Meson Press;, first published in French 2009 , http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/books/titles/in-catastrophic-times/. Accessed 9 September 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Yi Sencindiver, S.. ( 2017;), ‘ New materialism. ’, Oxford Bibliographies , www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780190221911/obo-9780190221911-0016.xml. Accessed 17 September 2020.
  18. Tate Shots ( 2018;), ‘ Lindsay Seers: “‘I turned myself into a camera”. ’, Tate YouTube channel , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0XqeAFS4Qk. Accessed 23 January 2022.
  19. Mellor, Jemma Naomi. ( 2022;), ‘ Mediators and the vitality of matter in drawing practices. ’, Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice, 7:2, pp. 21325, https://doi.org/10.1386/drtp_00090_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00090_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00090_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Keyword(s): co-production; concrete; cotton; illustration; materiality; new materialism; sensorial

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed