Skip to content
1981
Drawing Disobedient Bodies
  • ISSN: 2057-0384
  • E-ISSN: 2057-0392

Abstract

Considering character drawings as images that can be addressed not only in terms of representation of reality but also in terms of vitality and life, this paper aims to place them in a broader visual studies context to debate over the following question: Why do we experience these pictorial devices, this collection of lines, as being something more than just that? In other words, how can we develop a framework to understand these experiences taking into account not only character drawing’s relation with meaning and reality but also concepts such as sentience and agency? Making a case for character drawings’ paradoxical placement within western modernity as pictures that reappropriate drawing, from an act of explanation and argumentation to one of creation, it will follow Tim Ingold (2013) and his account of the drawing activity in order to comprehend how its affordances may fuel the particular type of reception fostered by character drawings and defined by E. H. Gombrich (1984) in terms of life. Then, as an example of a particular tradition of drawing that indulges in this paradoxical nature, the paper will look to early modern manga artists such as Osamu Tezuka and how they engage with this illusion of life by employing gestural lines, allowing characters to exist as what Eiji Ōtsuka (2001) defines as bodies that are both iconic and mortal. Finally, this paper aims to contribute to the visual studies field by highlighting possible approaches to this non-indexical image within a visual media context.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00137_1
2024-12-18
2025-03-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adachi, Kayu (2019), Nihon no manga anime ni okeru tatakai no hyōgen (‘Representation of conflict in Japanese manga and anime’), Tokyo: Gendai Shokan.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Batista Della Porta, Giovanni (1558), Magia naturalis (Natural Magick), Naples: Matthias Cancer.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Batista Della Porta, Giovanni (1586), De humana physiognomonia (‘The human physiognomy’), Vico Equense: Giuseppe Cacchi.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cain, Patricia (2010), The Enactive Evolution of the Practitioner, Bristol: Intellect.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans, Jessica and Hall, Stuart (eds) (1999), Visual Culture: The Reader, London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gell, Alfred (1998), Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory, London: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gombrich, Ernst H. (1984), Art and Illusion: A Study into the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, London: Phaidon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Heidegger, Martin (1977), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, New York: Garland Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hogarth, William (1743), Characters and Caricaturas, London: William Hogarth.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ingold, Tim (2013), Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ippei, Okamoto (1928), Shin manga no kakikata (‘The new manga drawing guide’), Tokyo: Chuō Bijutsusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ito, (2014), Tezuka izu deddo: hirakareta manga hyōgenron e (‘Tezuka is dead: Towards an open theory of manga representation’), Tokyo: Seikaisha.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kitane, Yukata ([1879] 1981), Maru Maru Chinbun 4, Tokyo: Honpō Shoseki.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kris, Ernst and Gombrich, Ernst H. (1952), ‘The principles of caricature’, in E. Kris (ed.), Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art, New York: International University Press, pp. 189203.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mitchel, William J. T. (2005), What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ōtsuka, Eiji (2001), Kyoyō toshite no manga anime (‘Manga and anime as culture’), Tokyo: Kodansha.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Slater, Don (1995), ‘Photography and the modern vision: The spectacle of “natural magic”’, in N. Bryson (ed.), Visual Culture, London: Routledge, pp. 21837.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tezuka, Osamu ([1945] 1995), Shōri no hi Made (‘Until the day of victory’), Tokyo: Asashi Shinbunsha.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tezuka, Osamu ([1952–54] 2010), Manga Kyōshitsu (‘Manga classroom’), Tokyo: Shōgakukan.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tezuka, Osamu (1977), Manga no kakikata nigaoe kara chōhen e (‘The manga drawing guide: From caricature portrait to the novel’), Tokyo: Kōbunsha.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Töpffer, Rodolphe (1845), Essai de Physiognomonie (‘Essays on physiognomy’), Geneva: Schmidt, https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=HwY-AAAAcAAJ&dq=editions%3ANsVEElmgqZoC&pg=PA2. Accessed 3 March 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Eck, Caroline (2015), Art, Agency and Living Presence: From the Animated Image to the Excessive Object, Berlin: DeGruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Varis, Essi (2019), ‘The monster analogy: Why fictional characters are Frankenstein’s monsters’, Substance, 48:1, pp. 6386.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Vesali, Andrea (1543), De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem (On the Fabric of the Human Body in Seven Books), Basel: Joannes Oporinus.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yoshimura, Kazuma (2003), ‘Nigaoe no seiritsu to manga: kao o miteiru no wa dareka?’ (‘Manga and the birth of caricature: Who is the face we are looking at?’), in J. Berndt (ed.), Manbiken: Towards an Aesthetics of Comics, Kyoto: Daigō Shobō, pp. 94131.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00137_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00137_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test