Skip to content
1981
Drawing Disobedient Bodies
  • ISSN: 2057-0384
  • E-ISSN: 2057-0392

Abstract

Leaky Embodiment Alter-ego Personas (LEAPs) are visions of tragicomic actors with bodies comprising bulbous, mismatched and ever-changing parts. Their portrayal is meant to challenge ideal notions of embodiment, particularly through envisioning an inherent and intensified otherness of the body, where ruptures occur between desire and empirical reality with respect to an ‘owner’s’ body. Conceived first through sketches, one LEAP figure was portrayed further as a 1:1 mixed-media relief. Two narrative voices – notes from the field by the artist and imagined dialogues between the artist and the LEAP – explore the perception of this process. The pairing of the two narratives exposes contradictions between artistic intentionality and effect. Drawing, whether as a trace with a ballpoint pen, scalpel or jigsaw, was a thread through the process of creation, with various effects ranging from delineating to unravelling. Drawing enacted a physical connection between the real and the imaginary, conflating the bodies of the creator and the depicted figure. Yet as the differing perspectives and evolving manifestations of embodiment in the narratives show, the actuality of bodies is not necessarily found in their facticity; how they feel and what they mean remains multivalent and shifting depending on positioning amidst differing subjectivities, circumstances and temporal frames. Drawing the LEAP’s body enabled traversals of dichotomies of subject/object, self/other and alien/familiar, complicating the assumed categories and opening ground for speculation of what a body could be and do.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00138_1
2024-12-18
2025-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ayuso, A. (2022), Experiments with Body Agent Architecture: The 586-year-old Spiritello in Il Regno Digitale, London: UCL Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bogost, I. (2012), Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Craft, C. (2005), ‘Come see about me: Enchantment of the double in The Picture of Dorian Gray’, Representations, 91:1, pp. 10936.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Deleuze, G. and Parnet, C. (1987), Dialogues II (trans. H. Tomlinson and B. Habberjam), New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Frascari, M. (2011), Eleven Exercises in the Art of Architectural Drawing: Slow Food for the Architectural Imagination, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Haraway, D. (2016), Staying with Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hersey, G. (2009), Falling in Love with Statues: Artificial Humans from Pygmalion to the Present, London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jameson, F. (2005), Archaeologies of the Future and Other Science Fictions, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Levinas, E. (1969), Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (trans. A. Lingis), Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Magri, E. and McQueen, P. (2023), Critical Phenomenology: An Introduction, Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mirzoeff, N. (1995), Bodyscape: Art, Modernity and the Ideal Figure, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zylinska, J. (2005), The Ethics of Cultural Studies, London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00138_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00138_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test