Skip to content
1981
Territorial Inscription: Drawing Out Bodies
  • ISSN: 2057-0384
  • E-ISSN: 2057-0392

Abstract

This article presents soil conceptual frameworks to understand soils as historical living archives, such as the understanding of soil palimpsest memory and the way in which local material histories expand over the territory. Soil memory concepts have been widely explored and instrumentalized to understand Earth’s history and much more extensively in archaeological records, where relationships between environmental conditions and human activities are mutually shaped, so environmental changes can be recorded in soil memory over time. For this article, drawing serves to bring attention to the details of soil memory that are visible in the unearthed materials. Moreover, drawing articulates soil detailing across scales, starting with the microscopical drawings illustrating the forensic attention required to delineate features associated with environmental dynamics. The drawings presented in this work integrate the microscopic detailing, the soil pits and the territorial scale photographs, slicing and layering the grounds to expose the material manifestations of the presented soil concepts. The drawings presented in this work elaborate on the palimpsest nature of soil memory, meaning that when looking at a soil at the present, it is possible to see the factors of its formation from the present, the recent past and the remote past. By drawing different processes recorded in soil formation, historical drawings can provide insights into processes and moments in time that can hint at alternatives worth proposing and drawing for design and planning purposes. The soil conceptual frameworks are used to bridge concepts that can provoke material and metaphorical fresh lenses to represent soils as living archives of the processes of landscape design. The drawings presented were developed in the Just Transition research project and explore how soil knowledges provoke soil-related visual narratives relevant for the design and planning fields through their concepts, methods and metaphors.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00165_1
2025-12-18
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Denizen, S. (2023), ‘Soils in landscape planning’, in M. J. Goss and M. A. Oliver (eds), Encyclopaedia of Soils in the Environment, vol. 3, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 580–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Denizen, S. (n.d.), ‘Thinking through soil’, https://thinkingthroughsoil.studio/. Accessed 3 April 2025.
  3. Dokuchaev, V. ([1883] 2008), Russian Chernozem (ed. B. F. Aparin), St Petersburg: Russkaya kollektsiya.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Dror, I., Yaron, B. and Berkowitz, B. (2022), ‘The human impact on all soil-forming factors during the Anthropocene’, ACS Environmental Au, 2:1, pp. 11–19, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.1c00010.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Elden, S. (2010), ‘Land, terrain, territory’, Progress in Human Geography, 34:6, pp. 799–817, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362603.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Elden, S. (2015), ‘Stuart Elden – Territory: Political technology, volume, terrain’, YouTube, 13 November, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QiS714BXxc. Accessed 27 November 2024.
  7. Kitchen, L., Milbourne, P., Marsden, T. and Bishop, K. (2002), ‘Forestry and environmental democracy: The problematic case of the South Wales Valleys’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 4:2, pp. 139–55, https://doi.org/10.1002/jepp.106.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Luciano Suastegui, E. (2017), ‘Caracterización de materiales pedosedimentarios asociados al Templo Mayor y a la Estela de Cuicuilco’, Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14330/TES01000759633. Accessed 2 September 2025.
  9. Luciano Suastegui, E., Martinez Caldera, R. and Yehia, Y. (2019), Just Transition: The (Un)intended Consequences of Greening, London: AA Landscape Urbanism.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller, H. G. (1999), ‘Great Britain’, in P. Gluck, G. Oesten, H. Schanz and K. Volz (eds), Formulation and Implementation of National Forest Programmes, vol. 2, Freiburg, Germany, 18–20 May, Joensuu: European Forest Institute, pp. 119–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Powersystems (n.d.), ‘Pen y Cymoedd wind farm’, https://www.powersystemsuk.co.uk/project/pen-y-cymoedd-wind-farm/. Accessed 20 August 2019.
  12. Rivera-Uria, M. Y., Sedov, S., Solleiro Rebolledo, E., Pérez Pérez, J., McClung, E., González, A. and Gama Castro, J. (2007), ‘Degradación ambiental en el valle Teotihuacán: evidencias geológicas y paleopedológicas’, Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, 59:2, https://doi.org/10.18268/bsgm2007v59n2a5.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Rusakova, E., Sukhacheva, E. and Hartemink, A. E. (2022), ‘Vasiliy Dokuchaev: A biographical sketch on the occasion of his 175th birthday’, Geoderma, 412, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115718.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Stefanko, R. (2006), Coal Mining Theory and Practice, New York: Mining Engineering.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Targulian, V. O. and Bronnikova, M. A. (2019), ‘Soil memory: Theoretical basics of the concept, its current state, and prospects for development’, Eurasian Soil Science, 52:3, pp. 229–43, https://doi.org/10.1134/s1064229319030116.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Targulian, V. O. and Goryachkin, S. V. (2004), ‘Soil memory: Types of record, carriers, hierarchy and diversity’, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 21:1, pp. 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Vogel, H. J., Balseiro-Romero, M., Kravchenko, A., Otten, W., Pot, V., Schlüter, S., Weller, U. and Baveye, P. C. (2022), ‘A holistic perspective on soil architecture is needed as a key to soil functions’, European Journal of Soil Science, 73:1, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13152.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Williams, R. (2008), Notes on the Underground: An Essay on Technology, Society, and the Imagination, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00165_1
Loading
Palimpsest-wise soil drawings: Territorial inscriptions of time
Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice 10, 235 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/drtp_00165_1
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00165_1
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00165_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): geology; landscape; microscopy; palimpsest; section; soil; territory

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test