Examining the emergence of Hong Kong identity: A critical study of the 1970s Cantonese sketch comedy, The Hui Brothers Show | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Modern Popular Culture in Middle-Class Japan
  • ISSN: 2051-7084
  • E-ISSN: 2051-7092

Abstract

Research on Hong Kong identity has focused on several pivotal periods (the 1997 Handover, and the 2014 and 2019 protests), which situates local, postcolonial Hong Kong identity as oppositional to a national Chinese identity. While these time points are critical, it is also important to attend to earlier Hong Kong media, including humorous works. Better understanding of how Hong Kong humour operates expands our knowledge about humour, identity and media studies beyond the prolific cinematic output. This article reports on the content analysis of 8.8 hours of the sketch comedy show, 雙星報喜 () 1971–72. The Hui brothers broke the ‘two fools’ tradition of vernacularized and self-deprecating comedy by incorporating content reflecting Hongkongers’ everyday experience and coinciding with a rise in television viewership. We report three representative themes: (1) luxury and novelty, (2) social commentaries and behaviour governance and (3) the normalization and centring of working-class lifestyles as ‘Hong Kong’ lifestyles. We argue that these themes from the 1970s have planted the seeds to Hong Kong identity boundaries that have been (re)constructed and (re)imagined in contemporary Hong Kong history thus offering opportunities for collective self-reflection about what it meant to be a Hongkonger then and what it means now.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eapc_00074_1
2022-09-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahn, So-Yeon. ( 2016;), ‘ Exploring language awareness through students’ engagement in language play. ’, Language Awareness, 25:1&2, pp. 4054.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Attardo, Salvatore, and Raskin, Victor. ( 1991;), ‘ Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. ’, Humor, 4:3&4, pp. 293347.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, Mikhail. ( 1984), Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (ed. and trans. C. Emerson.), Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhabha, Homi K.. ( 2004;), ‘ Of mimicry and men: The ambivalence of colonial discourse. ’, in H. K. Bhabha. (ed.), The Location of Culture, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 12131.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan, Joseph M., and Lee, Francis L. F.. ( 2007;), ‘ Media and politics in Hong Kong: A decade after the handover. ’, China Perspectives, 2007:2, pp. 4956, http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/1673. Accessed 7 November 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan, Marjorie K. M.. ( 2006;), ‘ The judge goes to pieces (審死官): A linguistic study of humor in a Cantonese opera. ’, in J. Xing. (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-18), Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, 23–25 June, Los Angeles, CA:: GSIL Publications;, pp. 5471.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheung, Chau-Kiu, and Yue, Xiao Dong. ( 2012;), ‘ Sojourn students’ humor styles as buffers to achieve resilience. ’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36:3, pp. 35364.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chey, Jocelyn. ( 2016;), ‘ Cantonese “xiehouyu”: Sardonicism in a regional culture under threat. ’, The Journal of the Oriental Society of Australia, 48, pp. 16781.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Choi, Po King. ( 1990;), ‘ From dependence to self-sufficiency: Rise of the Indigenous culture of Hong Kong 1945–89. ’, Asian Culture, 14, pp. 16177.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chu, Stephen Y. W.. ( 2017), Hong Kong Cantopop: A Concise History, Hong Kong:: Hong Kong University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chung, Po Yin. (鍾寶賢) ( 2007), Hoeng1gong2 Jing2si6jip6 Baak3nin4 (‘The century of Hong Kong film and television industry’), Hong Kong:: Joint Publishing HK;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Davé, Shilpa. ( 2013), Indian Accents: Brown Voice and Racial Performance in American Television and Film, Champaign, IL:: University of Illinois Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunphy, Graeme, and Emig, Rainer. ( 2010;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in R. Enig, and G. Dunphy. (eds), Hybrid Humour: Comedy in Transcultural Perspectives, Leiden:: Brill;, pp. 130.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eighteenth Floor Block C ( 1968–present), Commercial Radio Hong Kong;, Hong Kong:, 3 July.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Emerson, Robert M.,, Fretz, Rachel I., and Shaw, Linda L.. ( 1995), Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Erickson, Hal. ( 2000), ‘From Beautiful Downtown Burbank’: A Critical History of Rowan and Martin’s Laugh-In, 1968–1973, Jefferson, NC:: McFarland & Co;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Erni, John Nguyet. ( 2001;), ‘ Like a postcolonial culture: Hong Kong re-imagined. ’, Cultural Studies, 15:3&4, pp. 389418.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Feil, Ken. ( 2014), Rowan and Martin’s Laugh-In, Detroit, MI:: Wayne State University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fleming, Kara K.. ( 2015;), ‘ Ideology, identity, and linguistic repertoires among South Asian students in Hong Kong. ’, Ph.D. dissertation, Hong Kong:: University of Hong Kong Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fung, Anthony. ( 2001;), ‘ What makes the local? A brief consideration of the rejuvenation of Hong Kong identity. ’, Cultural Studies, 15:3&4, pp. 591601.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gumperz, John. ( 1992;), ‘ Contextualization revisited. ’, in P. Auer, and A. Di Luzio. (eds), The Contextualization of Language, vol. 22, Amsterdam:: John Benjamins Publishing Company;, pp. 3953.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hong Kong 81 ( 1981, Hong Kong:: Television Broadcasts Limited;).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Irvine, Judith, and Gal, Susan. ( 2000;), ‘ Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. ’, in P. V. Kroskrity. (ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, Santa Fe, NM:: School of American Research Press;, pp. 3583.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, Paul S. N.. ( 1991;), ‘ The absorption and indigenization of foreign media cultures: A study on a cultural meeting point of the east and west: Hong Kong. ’, Asian Journal of Communication, 1:2, pp. 5272.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lin, Angel Mei Yi. ( 2000;), ‘ Lively children trapped in an island of disadvantage: Verbal play of Cantonese working-class schoolboys in Hong Kong. ’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 143, pp. 6383.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ma, Eric Kit-Wai. (馬傑偉) ( 1996), Din6si6 Jyu5 Man4faa3 Jing6tung4 (Television and Identity), Hong Kong:: Breakthrough Ltd;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mathews, Gordon,, Ma, Erik Kit-Wai, and Lui, Tai-Lok. ( 2007), Hong Kong, China: Learning to Belong to a Nation, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ng, Ho. (吳昊) ( 2003), Hoeng1gong2 Din6si6 Si2waa6 (The History of HK Television), Hong Kong:: Subculture Ltd HK;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pietikäinen, Sari. ( 2016;), ‘ Critical debates: Discourse, boundaries and social change. ’, in N. Coupland. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;, pp. 26381.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Purcell, Darren,, Heitmeier, Brooks, and Van Wyhe, Chad. ( 2016;), ‘ Critical geopolitics and the framing of the Arab Spring through late-night humor. ’, Social Science Quarterly, 98:2, pp. 51331.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Rea, Christopher. ( 2015), The Age of Irreverence, Oakland, CA:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Schlatter, George. ( 1968–73, Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In, USA:: George Schlatter-Ed Friendly Productions in Association with Romart Inc;).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Shih, Evelyn. ( 2018;), ‘ Two fools: Comedy as dialectical tension in mid-century Chinese cinemas. ’, Journal of Chinese Cinemas, 12:2, pp. 12741.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Shih, Shu-Mei. ( 2007), Visuality and Identity: Sinophone Articulations across the Pacific, Oakland, CA:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. So, Alvin Y.. ( 1986;), ‘ The economic success of Hong Kong: Insights from a World-System perspective. ’, Sociological Perspectives, 29:2, pp. 24158.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tang, Ching Kin. (鄧正健) ( 2016;), ‘ How did Dayo Wong heal Hong Kong? The evolution of the god of humour. ’, The Initium, 13 September, https://theinitium.com/article/20160913-culture-standupcomedy-wongtzewah-1/. Accessed 10 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Teo, Stephen. ( 2019), Hong Kong Cinema: The Extra Dimensions, New York:: Bloomsbury Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. The Beatles ( 1967;), ‘ When I’m Sixty Four. ’, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, vinyl, UK:: Parlophone;.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tsang, Steve. ( 2003;), ‘ The rise of a Hong Kong identity. ’, in L. Fernández-Stembridge, and T. Fisac. (eds), China Today: Economic Reforms, Social Cohesion and Collective Identities, London:: Routledge;, pp. 22239.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Veg, Sebastian. ( 2014;), ‘ Anatomy of the ordinary: New perspectives in Hong Kong independent cinema. ’, Journal of Chinese Cinemas, 8:1, pp. 7392.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Veg, Sebastian. ( 2017;), ‘ The rise of  “localism” and civic identity in post-handover Hong Kong: Questioning the Chinese nation-state. ’, The China Quarterly, 230, pp. 32347.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Woolard, Kathryn A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Playing with peripheralization: A commentary. ’, in L. Cornips, and V. A. de Rooij. (eds), The Sociolinguistics of Place and Belonging: Perspectives from the Margins, Amsterdam:: John Benjamins;, pp. 11524.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Yew, Chiew Ping, and Kwong, Kin-Ming. ( 2014;), ‘ Hong Kong identity on the rise. ’, Asian Survey, 54:6, pp. 1088112.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Yue, Xiao Dong. ( 2011;), ‘ The Chinese ambivalence to humor: Views from undergraduates in Hong Kong and China. ’, Humor, 24:4, pp. 46380.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Lam, Charles, and Leung, Genevieve. ( 2022;), ‘ Examining the emergence of Hong Kong identity: A critical study of the 1970s Cantonese sketch comedy, The Hui Brothers Show. ’, East Asian Journal of Popular Culture, 8:2, pp. 20521, https://doi.org/10.1386/eapc_00074_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/eapc_00074_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/eapc_00074_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error