Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2051-7084
  • E-ISSN: 2051-7092

Abstract

What does humour do to us and our relationship with the society? This article examines political humour in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and asks how hegemony is mediated through political humour in China. Critical discourse analysis (CDA) of two Spring Festival Gala sketches, (‘chunwan xiaopin’), is applied not only for its ontological fit with the literature of hegemony but also because of its potential to unravel the hidden power relations. I argue for the social and psychological significance of xiaopin to the general public because they reveal the fragility of the intellectual hierarchy that places the rural population at the bottom, play with the heavy historical episode of the Great Leap Forward, and create the illusion of empowerment. Furthermore, it reveals that humour can be subversive on the textual level and simultaneously hegemonic on the discursive level.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eapc_00101_1
2023-07-11
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bottomore, Tom (1991), ‘Mediation’, in T. Bottomore, L. Harris, V. G. Kierman and R. Miliband (eds), A Dictionary of Marxist Thought, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 37375.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brzozowska, Dorota (2007), ‘Jokes, identity, and ethnicity’, in D. Popa and S. Attardo (eds), New Approaches to the Linguistics of Humour, Galati: Academica, pp. 8896.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carey, James (1992), Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society, New York: Routledge, pp. 1336.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Castells, Manuel (2007), ‘Communication, power and counter-power in the network society’, International Journal of Communication, 1, pp. 23866.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chouliaraki, Lilie (2000), ‘Political discourse in the news: Democratizing responsibility or aestheticizing politics’, Discourse and Society, 11:3, pp. 293314.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chouliaraki, Lilie (2008), ‘The mediation of suffering and the vision of a cosmopolitan public’, Television and New Media, 9:5, pp. 37191.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dikötter, Frank (2010), Mao’s Great Famine: The History of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958–1962, New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ding, Xueliang (2013), ‘Freedom and political humour’, in J. M. Davis and J. Chey (eds), Humour in Chinese Life and Culture: Resistance and Control in Modern Times, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 23253.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fairclough, Norman (1989), Language and Power, London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fairclough, Norman (1992), Discourse and Social Change, Oxford: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fairclough, Norman (1993), ‘Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities’, Discourse and Society, 4:2, pp. 13368.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fairclough, Norman (2001), ‘Critical discourse analysis’, in S. J. Yates, M. Wetherell and S. Taylor (eds), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 22966.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Giddens, Anthony (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gill, Rosalind (1996), ‘Discourse analysis: Practical implementation’, in J. T. E Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Science, Leicester: British Psychological Society, pp. 14158.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gill, Rosalind (2000), ‘Discourse analysis’, in M. Bauer and G. Gaskell (eds), Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound, London: Sage, pp. 17290.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goffman, Erving (1961), Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction, Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gramsci, Antonio ([1929–35] 1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (trans. Q. Hoare and G. Nowell-Smith), London: Lawrence and Wishart.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hmielowski, Jay D., Holbert, R. Lance and Lee, Jayeon (2011), ‘Predicting the consumption of political TV satire: Affinity for political humor, The Daily Show, and The Colbert Report’, Communication Monographs, 78:1, pp. 96114.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hsia, Hsi-Chi and Cheng, Yung-Shin (2006), ‘The impact of ideology on the interaction between tutors and students in the education of industrial design: A case study in Taiwan’, International Journal of Educational Development, 26:1, pp. 623.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hu, Lan (呼蘭) (2021), ‘mou mou yu wo’ (‘Somebody and me’), YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Eqhx8OMeCY. Accessed 15 November 2022.
  21. King, Gary, Pan, Jennifer and Roberts, Margarete (2013), ‘How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression’, The American Political Science Review, 107:2, pp. 32643.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kong, Shuyu (2014), Popular Media, Social Emotion and Public Discourse in Contemporary China, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuipers, Giselinde (2008), ‘The sociology of humour’, in V. Raskin (ed.), The Primer of Humour Research, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 36198.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, Chin-Chuan (2000), ‘Chinese communication: Prisms, trajectories, and modes of understanding’, in C.-C. Lee (ed.), Power, Money, and Media: Communication Patterns and Bureaucratic Control in Cultural China, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 344.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, Shu (李姝) and Fan, Dongbo (範東波) (2004) ‘Chen Peisi daying le guansi que zhijin weijian yangshi sanshisanwan peichang’ (‘Chen Peisi won the court case but hasn’t received CCTV’s ¥33,0000 reparation’), Huaxi Dushi Bao, 16 November, https://web.archive.org/web/20131021043908/http://ent.qq.com/a/20041116/000016.htm. Accessed 30 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lichter, S. Robert, Baumgartner, Jody C. and Morris, Jonathan S. (2014), Politics Is a Joke! How TV Comedians Are Remaking Political Life, New York and London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, Jin (2013), Signifying the Local: Media Productions Rendered in Local Languages in Mainland China in the New Millennium, Boston, MA: Brill, pp. 12142.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lüqiu, Luwei (2017), ‘The cost of humour: Political satire on social media and censorship in China’, Global Media & Communication, 13:2, pp. 12338.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Makwambeni, Blessing and Adebayo, Joseph O. (2021), ‘“Humour and the Politics of Resistance”: Audience readings of popular amateur videos in Zimbabwe’, in S. Mpofu (ed.), The Politics of Laughter in the Social Media Age: Perspectives from the Global South, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 15573.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Martín-Barbero, Jesus (1993), Communication, Culture and Hegemony: From the Media to Mediations, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Meng, Yang (2019), ‘Fun things to know about the Spring Festival Galas’, CGTV, 3 February, https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d774d3559444e32457a6333566d54/index.html. Accessed 17 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Meyer, John C. (2000), ‘Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication’, Communication Theory, 10:3, pp. 31031.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Meyer, Michael (2001), ‘Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA’, in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 1431.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Meyrowitz, Joshua (1985), No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Meyrowitz, Joshua (1998), ‘Multiple media literacies’, Journal of Communication, 48:1, pp. 96108.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mouffe, Chantal (1979), ‘Hegemony and ideology in Gramsci’, in C. Mouffe (ed.), Gramsci and Marxist Theory, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 168204.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mu, Aili (2004), ‘Two of Zhao Benshan’s comic skits: 1 Their critical implications in contemporary China’, Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 30:2, pp. 334.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Orwell, George ([1945] 1968), ‘Funny, but not vulgar’, in S. Orwell and I. Angus (eds), The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell: As I Please 1943–1945, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., pp. 28388.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Paltridge, Brian (2006), Discourse Analysis: An Introduction, London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pan, Jennifer (2017), ‘How market dynamics of domestic and foreign social media firms shape strategies of internet censorship’, Problems of Post-Communism, 64:3–4, pp. 16788.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Pieke, Frank N. (2012), ‘The communist party and social management in China’, China Information, 26:2, pp. 14965.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Saich, Tony (2006), ‘Hu’s in charge’, Asian Survey, 46:1, pp. 3748.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Schutz, Charles E. (1977), Political Humor: From Aristophanes to Sam Ervin, Vancouver: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Silverstone, Roger (2000), ‘The sociology of mediation and communication’, in C. Calhoun, C. Rojek and B. Turner (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Sociology, London: Sage, pp. 188207.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Snape, Holly (2019), ‘Social management or social governance: A review of party and government discourse and why it matters in understanding Chinese politics’, Journal of Chinese Political Science, 24:4, pp. 68599.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Speier, Hans (1998), ‘Wit and politics: An essay on laughter and power’, American Journal of Sociology, 103:5, pp. 1352401.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Stein, May Beth (1989), ‘The politics of humour: The Berlin Wall in jokes and graffiti’, Western Folklore, 48:2, pp. 85108.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Stoddart, Mark C. J. (2007), ‘Ideology, hegemony, discourse: A critical review of theories of knowledge and power’, Social Thought and Research, 28, pp. 191225.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tsakona, Villy and Popa, Diana Elnea (2011), Studies in Political Humour: In Between Political Critique and Public Entertainment, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Dijk, Teun A. (1993), ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis’, Discourse and Society, 4:2, pp. 24983.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Walsh, David (1998), ‘Structure and agency’, in C. Jenks (ed.), Core Sociological Dichotomies, London: Sage, pp. 833.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, Hongjian (2022), ‘From court fools to stage puppets: Country bumpkins in the skits on CCTV’s Spring Festival Gala, 1983–2022’, The China Quarterly, 250, pp. 55271.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, Xiao (2010), ‘Entertainment, education, or propaganda: A longitudinal analysis of China Central Television’s Spring Festival Galas’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 54:3, pp. 39106.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Widdowson, Henry (1995), ‘Discourse analysis: A critical view’, Language and Literature, 4:3, pp. 15772.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Williams, Raymond (1977), ‘From reflection to mediation’, in R. Williams (ed.), Marxism and Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 95100.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wodak, Ruth (2001), ‘What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its development’, in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 113.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhao, Bin (1998), ‘Popular family television and party ideology: The Spring Festival Eve happy gathering’, Culture and Society, 20:1, pp. 4358.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhou, Jinhua (周金華) (1997), ‘Chunjie Lianhuan Wanhui de Jiazhi Quxiang’ (‘The value orientations of the Spring Festival Gala’), Television Studies, pp. 4347.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Ziv, Avner (1984), Personality and Sense of Humor, New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/eapc_00101_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/eapc_00101_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test