Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. European Journal of American Culture
  4. Volume 43, Issue 3
  5. Article
Recent Reflections on the Posthuman Condition in American Literature and Culture
  • ISSN: 1466-0407
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9118
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Trauma studies and posthuman studies are two paradigms that became popular in the late twentieth century and have been used to define the culture of our time. Both fields deal with subjectivity, agency, embodiment and the relation with ‘the other’, viewing subjectivity and the self as shattered and fragmented. However, while trauma studies focuses on the process of acting out and working through to return to a sealed, complete conception of the self, posthuman studies explores the fluidity and interconnectedness that results from the decentralization of human subjectivity in our technological, boundary-blurring reality. This article introduces the concept of the posthuman trauma novel, which delves into the shared sense of vulnerability between trauma and posthumanism and the complex identity dynamics emerging from these paradigms. Formally, these novels favour complex timelines, non-linear narratives, interconnected plotlines, emotional detachment, machine-like narrators and thematic fragmentation, among other strategies. Patricia Lockwood’s (2021) is a representative example of the posthuman trauma novel that navigates virtual and real worlds. Through fragmentation, intrusive images and non-linearity, the novel represents the disintegration of the mind caused by the internet and social media in which the sense of self is engulfed by a collective consciousness emerging from the never-ending scrolling and the juxtapositions between the important and the shallow. It is a real-world trauma that pulls the protagonist out of the virtual world of disembodiment and detachment. While acknowledging the importance of social media and digital technologies, the novel also sees the blurring of digital and physical spaces as a wound of modern subjectivity, a suffering that needs to be worked through to achieve an embodied and embedded conceptualization of the self.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/
  • ERDF
  • Aragonese Regional Government (DGA)
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Intellect Ltd.
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows users to copy, distribute and transmit the article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes, and the work is not modified or adapted in any way. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ejac_00124_1
2024-12-09
2025-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ejac/43/3/ejac.43.3.219_Baelo-Allue.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/ejac_00124_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alaimo, Stacy (2010), Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow, John P. (1996), ‘A declaration of the independence of cyberspace’, Electric Frontier Foundation, 8 February, https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence. Accessed 9 January 2024.
  3. Berick, Julia (2021), ‘Sliding into Patricia Lockwood’s DMs’, The Paris Review, 17 February, https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2021/02/17/sliding-into-patrica-lockwoods-dms/. Accessed 9 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyle, Megan (2018), Liveblog, New York: Tyrant Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Braidotti, Rosi (2013), The Posthuman, Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bump, Philip (2013), ‘The best tweets of all time, according to us’, The Atlantic, 7 November, https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2013/11/best-tweets-all-time-according-us/355586/. Accessed 9 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Caplan, Walker (2021), ‘All the memes in Patricia Lockwood’s No One Is Talking About This, explained’, Literary Hub, 22 February, https://lithub.com/all-the-memes-in-patricia-lockwoods-no-one-is-talking-about-this-explained/. Accessed 9 January 2024.
  8. Caracciolo, Marco (2022), ‘Narrative and posthumanism/posthumanist narratives’, in S. Herbrechter, I. Callus, M. Rossini, M. Grech, M. de Bruin-Molé and C. J. Müller (eds), Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1097–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Caruth, Cathy (1996), Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Coeckelbergh, Mark (2011), ‘Vulnerable cyborgs: Learning to live with our dragons’, Journal of Evolution & Technology, 22:1, https://jetpress.org/v22/coeckelbergh.htm. Accessed 9 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Daigle, Christine (2023), Posthumanist Vulnerability: An Affirmative Ethics, London and New York: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. DeLillo, Don (2020), The Silence, New York: Scribner.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Egan, Jennifer (2022), The Candy House, New York: Scribner.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Farrell, Kirby (1998), Post-Traumatic Culture: Injury and Interpretation in the Nineties, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Figley, Charles R. (1985), ‘Introduction’, in C. Figley (ed.), Trauma and Its Wake: The Study and Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, New York: Brunner/Mazel, pp. xvii–xxvi.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fineman, Martha A. (2008), ‘The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20:1, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1131407. Accessed 9 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Freud, Sigmund (1957), ‘Mourning and melancholia’, in J. Strachey (ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 14, London: The Hogarth Press, pp. 243–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gibbs, Alan (2014), Contemporary American Trauma Narratives, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Grosz, Elisabeth (1994), Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Grusin, Richard (2015), ‘Introduction’, in R. Grusin (ed.), The Nonhuman Turn, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. vii–xxix.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Haraway, Donna (1991), ‘A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century’, in D. Haraway (ed.), Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge, pp. 149–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hayles, N. Katherine (1999), How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Heise, Ursula K. (2011), ‘The posthuman turn: Rewriting species in recent American literature’, in C. F. Levander and R. S. Levine (eds), A Companion to American Literary Studies, Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 454–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Herbrechter, Stefan (2013), Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis, London and New York: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Herbrechter, Stefan, Callus, Ivan, de Bruin-Molé, Megen, Grech, Marija, Müller, Christopher John and Rossini, Manuela (2022), ‘Critical posthumanism: An overview’, in S. Herbrechter, I. Callus, M. Rossini, M. Grech, M. de Bruin-Molé and C. J. Müller (eds), Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Jerkins, Morgan (2017), ‘Patricia Lockwood: The poet laureate of Twitter’, Rolling Stone, 1 May, https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/patricia-lockwood-the-poet-laureate-of-twitter-108778/. Accessed 9 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kasulke, Calvin (2021), Several People Are Typing, New York: Doubleday.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kolbert, Elisabeth (2014), The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History, London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kurzweil, Ray (2005), The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, New York: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. LaCapra, Dominick (1999), ‘Trauma, absence, loss’, Critical Inquiry, 25:4, pp. 696–727.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. LaCapra, Dominick (2001), Writing History, Writing Trauma, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lévy, Pierre (1997), Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace (trans. R. Bononno), Cambridge: Helix Books and Perseus Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Leys, Ruth (2000), Trauma: A Genealogy, Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lim, Eugene (2021), Search History, Minneapolis, MN: Coffee House Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lockwood, Patricia (2012), Balloon Pop Outlaw Black, Portland: Octopus Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lockwood, Patricia (2014), Motherland Fatherland Homelandsexuals, New York: Penguin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lockwood, Patricia (2017), Priestdaddy, New York: Riverhead Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lockwood, Patricia (2019), ‘The communal mind: The internet and me’, London Review of Books, 41:4, https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v41/n04/patricia-lockwood/the-communal-mind. Accessed 9 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lockwood, Patricia (2021), No One Is Talking about This, London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Luckhurst, Roger (2003), ‘Traumaculture’, New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics, 50, pp. 28–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Luckhurst, Roger (2008), The Trauma Question, New York and London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lupton, Deborah, Clark, Marianne and Southerton, Clare (2022), ‘Digitized and datafied embodiment: A more-than-human approach’, in S. Herbrechter, I. Callus, M. Rossini, M. Grech, M. de Bruin-Molé and C. J. Müller (eds), Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 361–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Morrison, Toni (1987), Beloved, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Nayar, Pramod K. (2014), Posthumanism, Cambridge and Malden, MD: Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. O’Brien, Tim (1990), The Things They Carried, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Oyler, Lauren (2021), Fake Accounts, New York: Catapult.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Peters, Michael A. (2020), ‘Posthumanism, platform ontologies and the “wounds of modern subjectivity”’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52:6, pp. 579–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Philbeck, Thomas D. (2015), ‘Onscreen ontology: Stages in the posthumanist paradigm shift’, in M. Hauskeller, T. D. Philbeck and C. D. Carbonell (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 391–400.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Piepenbring, Dan (2014), ‘The Paris Review reviews Paris’, The Paris Review, 1 January, https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2014/01/09/the-paris-review-reviews-paris/. Accessed 9 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Schwab, Klaus (2016), The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Brentford: Portfolio Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Seltzer, Mark (1997), ‘Wound culture: Trauma in the pathological public sphere’, October, 80, pp. 3–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Tew, Philip (2007), The Contemporary British Novel, London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. van der Kolk, Bessel A. and van der Hart, Onno (1995), ‘The intrusive past: The flexibility of memory and the engraving of trauma’, in C. Caruth (ed.), Trauma: Explorations in Memory, Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 158–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Vickroy, Laurie (2002), Trauma Fiction, Charlottesville, VA and London: University of Virginia Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Vickroy, Laurie (2015), Reading Trauma Narratives: The Contemporary Novel and the Psychology of Oppression, Charlottesville, VA and London: University of Virginia Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Vinci, Tony M. (2014), ‘Posthuman wounds: Trauma, non-anthropocentric vulnerability, and the human/android/animal dynamic in Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?’, Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 47:2, pp. 91–112.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Vint, Sherryl (2022), ‘Posthumanism and speculative fiction’, in S. Herbrechter, I. Callus, M. Rossini, M. Grech, M. de Bruin-Molé and C. J. Müller (eds), Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 225–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Westenfeld, Adrienne (2021), ‘In the face of tragedy, Patricia Lockwood found the real world again’, Esquire, 16 February, https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/books/a35463236/patricia-lockwood-no-one-is-talking-about-this-interview/. Accessed 9 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Wikipedia (2024), ‘Patricia Lockwood’, Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patricia_Lockwood&oldid=1207442819. Accessed 14 February 2024.
  60. Wilder, Darcie (2017), Literally Show Me A Healthy Person, New York: Tyrant Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Whitehead, Anne (2004), Trauma Fiction, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ejac_00124_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): fragmentation; Patricia Lockwood; posthuman studies; subjectivity; trauma studies; vulnerability

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test