Skip to content
1981
Volume 44, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1466-0407
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9118

Abstract

This article focuses on the teaching of the American family via a large lecture course that examines ideology, culture, family, gender, sexuality, race, class and nation through the study of media texts. The course applies a student-focused approach and attends to the material through a cultural studies frame. First, we describe the course and its goals and then we reflect on the practices we have brought to teaching the course that have garnered a positive reputation so that the course fills on the first day of registration. Through a reflective account of our experiences of teaching this class, the authors address how we engage students with media texts that they normally would not know of or would find difficult or even boring due to students’ curated media environments. We conclude with reflections on what we have learned from teaching this course. We hope this article helps other teachers of popular media and American culture as they construct their own courses to fit both student and teachers’ goals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ejac_00134_1
2025-03-19
2025-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anon. (2022), ‘Gen Z: Proudly the most sensitive generation’, Luxiders, 6 December, https://luxiders.com/gen-z-proudly-the-most-sensitive-generation/. Accessed 10 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bebee, Steven A. and Masterson, John (1986), Family Talk: Interpersonal Communication in the Family, New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carey, Benedict (2013), ‘Frequent tests can enhance college learning, study finds’, New York Times, 20 November, https://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/21/education/frequent-tests-can-enhance-college-learning-study-finds.html?smid=url-share. Accessed 10 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Center for Teaching and Learning (n.d.), ‘Creating a syllabus’, https://citl.illinois.edu/citl-101/teaching-learning/resources/teaching-strategies/creating-a-syllabus. Accessed 10 February 2024.
  5. Davis, Barbara Gross (1993), Tools for Teaching, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dynarski, Susan (2017), ‘Laptops are great: But not during a lecture or a meeting’, New York Times, 23 November, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/22/business/laptops-not-during-lecture-or-meeting.html. Accessed 10 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Oliver, Devin (2019), ‘Racial demographics at UIUC’, 29 November, https://waf.cs.illinois.edu/discovery/Racial-Demographics-at-UIUC/. Accessed 10 February 2024.
  8. Student Monitor (n.d.), ‘Top viewing trends for today’s college students’, Spectrum Enterprise, https://ir.westcliff.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/SE-ED-WP004-Campus-TV-Viewing-Trends.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2024.
  9. van der Weel, Rudd and van der Mere, Audrey (2024), ‘Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: A high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom’, Frontiers in Psychology, 14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219945.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Woolcock, Michael J. V. (2006), Constructing a Syllabus, Providence, RI: Brown University, Harriet W. Sheridan Center for Teaching and Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ejac_00134_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): cultural studies; family; pedagogy; student-focused; teaching; US culture
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test