Are integrationists sceptics? | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1757-1952
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1960

Abstract

Abstract

Integrationism advocates a radical epistemological reform in semiological theory. It is a relatively recent perspective, developed by Oxford Professor Roy Harris (1931–2015); yet integrationism’s main principles are best seen as the outcome of different timid trends in the history of theories of language. The epistemological exigencies that this perspective puts on theorists has often provoked reproaches that this perspective was too negative, nihilistic, destructive, a form of scepticism. This article takes this criticism at its word and outlines a comparison between the main form of scepticism known in Greek Antiquity, Pyrrhonism, and integrationism. A historical outline of the development of both movements is drawn, for context. Then particular issues serve as comparison points between both: the definition of doctrinal cohesion; the relation of each intellectual movement to ‘science’; the use of particular forms of arguments or ‘modes’; and some specific aspects of language-use that Pyrrhonism has addressed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc.9.2.201_1
2018-11-01
2024-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc.9.2.201_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error