Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication
  4. Volume 12, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1757-1952
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1960

Abstract

This article aims to contribute to the Peircean studies by providing an account of the reception of Peirce’s philosophy in Russian academia. Peirce was introduced to Russian scholarship at the beginning of the twentieth century, but Russian scholars’ work on Peirce remains unnoticed for the most part in the international academic world. Presenting an outline of their research fills a certain gap in the Peircean studies demonstrating how Peirce was received in imperial Russia, the USSR and post-Soviet Russian academia. This overview can also serve, to some extent, as a contribution to the studies in cross-cultural communication, because the authors present Russian philosophers’ take on an American philosopher considered in the context of the changing historical and cultural landscape. From being introduced to Peirce via a francophone scholar at the beginning of the twentieth century to criticizing Peirce from the stance of dialectical materialism during the Cold War and exploring Peirce’s original work from various angles in the recent decades, Russophone academics could not avoid being affected by the complexity of cross-cultural communication.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00026_1
2021-06-01
2025-05-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bazhanov, V. A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Jevristicheskie “podskazki” na puti k ne-aristotelevoj logike. ’, Vestnik VGU, 1, pp. 90–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bogomolov, A. S.,, Melvil, Iu. K., and Narskii, I. S.. ( 1968;), ‘ Concerning certain aspects of the critical analysis of contemporary bourgeois philosophy. ’, Soviet Studies in Philosophy, 6:4, pp. 45–55, https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967060445. Accessed 1 February 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Brent, J.. ( 1998;), ‘ The Wasp in the Bottle. ’, Charles Sanders Peirce: A Life, Bloomington, IN and Indianapolis, IN:: Indiana University Press;; , 2nd ed.., p. 323. Accessed 1 February 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Carus, P.. (ed.) ( 1910), Monist, 20:2.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ French and Russian in Imperial Russia, vol. 1, “Language use among the Russian elite”; Vol. 2, “Language attitudes and identity”. ’, Language & History, 59:2, pp. 131–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/17597536.2016.1177336. Accessed 1 February 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooke, E. F.. ( 2006), Peirce’s Pragmatic Theory of Inquiry: Fallibilism and Indeterminacy, London:: Bloomsbury;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Hébert, M.. ( 1911), Pragmatizm: issledovanie ego razlichnyh form: anglo-amerikanskih, francuzskih, ital'janskih i ego religioznogo znachenija, Sankt Peterburg:: Slovo;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Hébert, M.. ( [1908] 1909), Pragmatisme: étude de ses diverses formes anglo-américaines, françaises, italiennes et de sa valeur religieuse, Paris:: Nourry;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kiryushchenko, V. V.. ( 2008), Charl'z Sanders Pirs, ili Osa v butylke: vvedenie v intellektual'nuju istoriju Ameriki, Moscow:: Territorija budushchego;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Lahuti, D. G.. ( 2005;), ‘ Glossarij. ’, in U. Jeko. (ed.), Rol' chitatelja. Issledovanija po semiotike teksta, Saint Petersburg:: Simpozium;, pp. 459–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Lukianova, N. A.. ( 2010), Ot znaka k semioticheskim konstruktam kommunikativnogo prostranstv. Tomsk:: Izd-vo Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Lukin, V. A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Progressivnaja intolerantnost v komunikatvno-filozofkom izmerenii. ’, Politicheskaja konceptologija: zhurnal metadisciplinarnyh issledovanij, vol. 2, pp. 74–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Mayorga, R. M. P.-T.. ( 2007), From Realism to ‘Realicism’: The Metaphysics of Charles Sanders Peirce, Lanham:: Lexington Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Melvil, Y. K.. ( 1964), Filosofija Ch. S. Pirsa, Lanham:: Lexington Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Nechaev, S. J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Faneroskopija Ch. S. Pirsa versus fenomenologija Je. Husserlja. ’ Izvestija Saratovskogo universiteta, 12:1, pp. 25–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Peirce, C. S.. ( 1877;), ‘ The fixation of belief. ’, Popular Science Monthly, 12, November, pp. 1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Peirce, C. S.. ( 1878;), ‘ How to make our ideas clear. ’, Popular Science Monthly, 12, January, pp. 286–302.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Peirce, C. S.. ( 1897;), ‘ The logic of relatives. ’, Monist, 7:2, pp. 161–217.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Peirce, C. S.. ( 1908;), ‘ A neglected argument for the reality of God. ’, Hibbert Journal, 7:90, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Peirce, C. S.. ( 1992), Reasoning and the Logic of Things, Cambridge and London:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Peirce, C. S.. ( 1996a;), ‘ Zakreplenie verovanija. ’, Voprosy filosofii, vol. 12, pp. 106–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Peirce, C. S.. ( 1996b;), ‘ Kak sdelat’ nashi idei jasnymi. ’, Voprosy filosofii, vol. 12, pp. 120–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Peirce, C. S.. ( 2001), Principles of Philosophy, St. Petersburg:: St. Petersburg Philosophical Society;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Peirce, C. S.. ( 2005), Rassuzhdenie i logika veshhej: lekcii dlja Kembridzhskih konferencij 1898 goda (trans. D. G. Lahuti,, M. D. Lahuti,, S. O. Kuznecov.), Moscow:: Izdat. centr RGGU;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Popper, K.. ( 1972), Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford:: Clarendon Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ransdell, J.. ( 1989;), ‘ Peirce est-il un phénoménologue?. ’, Études Phénoménologiques, 5:9&10, pp. 51–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Rosensohn, W.. ( 1974), The Phenomenology of Charles S. Peirce, Amsterdam:: B. R. Grüner;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Ryder, J.. ( 1996;), ‘ Yuri K. Melvil and American pragmatism. ’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 32:4, pp. 598–632, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27794987. Accessed 11 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Spiegelberg, H.. ( 1956;), ‘ Husserl’s and Peirce’s phenomenologies: Coincidence or interaction. ’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 17:2, pp. 164–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Vasiliev, N. A.. ( 1912;), ‘ Voobrazhaemaja (nearistoteleva) logika. ’, Zhurnal Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshhenija, 40, August, pp. 207–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Vasiliev, N. A.. ( 1989), Voobrazhaemaja logika. Moscow:: Nauka;, pp. 94–123.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Vvedenskij, A. I.. ( 1917), Psihologija bez vsjakoj metafiziki, izdanie tret'e, Petrograd:: Tipografija M. M. Stasjulevicha;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Weiner, P.. ( 1967;), ‘ A Soviet philosopher’s view of Peirce’s pragmatism. ’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 3:1, pp. 3–12, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319489. Accessed 11 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Wiener, P. P.. ( 1946;), ‘ The evolutionism and pragmaticism of Peirce. ’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 7:3, pp. 321–50, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2707404. Accessed 13 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lukianova, Natalia, and Fell, Elena. ( 2021;), ‘ Peircean studies in Russia: A historical and cross-cultural perspective. ’, Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 12:1, pp. 19–33, https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00026_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00026_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): American studies; cross-cultural communication; Peirce; pragmatism; Russian academia; semiotics; the USSR; Yury Melvil

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test