Orality, writing, imagery and the rise of the imagistic

References

1. Adorno, T. W.. ( 1979), Negative Dialectics (trans. E. B. Ashton.), New York:: Seabury Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adorno, T. W.. ( 1982;), ‘ A portrait of Walter Benjamin. ’, in Prisms (trans. S. Weber, and S. Weber.), Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 229–41.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Adorno, T. W.. ( 1992;), ‘ Benjamin’s Einbahnstrasse. ’, in R. Tiedemann. (ed.), Notes to Literature, vol. 2, New York:: Columbia University Press;, pp. 322–27.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alexander, J. C.. ( 2013;), ‘ Iconic power and performance. ’, in J. C. Alexander,, D. Bartmaʼnski, and B. Giesen. (eds), Iconic Power Materiality and Meaning in Social Life, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 25–35.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Arato, A.. ( 2015;), ‘ Political theology and populism. ’, in C. de la Torre. (ed.), The Promise and Perils of Populism, Lexington:: Kentucky University Press;, pp. 31–58.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Aristotle ( 1928;), ‘ De Interpretatione. ’, in Aristotle: Categories and De Interpretatione (trans. J. L. Ackrill.), Oxford:: Clarendon Press;, pp. 43–68.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Benjamin, W.. ( 1999;), ‘ On the theory of knowledge, theory of progress. ’, in The Arcades Project (trans. H. Eiland, and K. McLaughlin.), Cambridge, MA:: Belknap Press;, pp. 456–88.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Benjamin, W.. ( 2000;), ‘ One-way street. ’, in M. Bullock, and M. W. Jennings. (eds), Selected Writings, Vol. 1, 1913–1926, Cambridge, MA:: Belknap Press;, pp. 444–88.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Benjamin, W.. ( 2002;), ‘ Review of Brod’s Franz Kafka. ’, in Walter Benjamin; Selected Writings, Vol. 3, 1935–38 (trans. E. Jephcott, and H. Eiland., ed. H. Eiland, and M. W. Jennings.), Cambridge, MA:: Belknap Press;, pp. 317–21.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Binder, W.. ( 2013;), ‘ The emergence of iconic depth. ’, in J. C. Alexander,, D. Bartmaʼnski, and B. Giesen. (eds), Iconic Power: Materiality and Meaning in Social Life, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 101–16.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Boulting, N. E.. ( 2001), To Be or Not to Be Philosophical, London:: Minerva Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Boulting, N. E.. ( 2006), On interpretative activity: A Peircian Approach to the Interpretation of Science, Leiden:: Brill;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Boulting, N. E.. ( 2014;), ‘ In defence of iconic reification. ’, Constellations, 21:1, pp. 83–95.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Boulting, N. E.. ( 2015;), ‘ Scale relative ontology and scientism. ’, Philosophica, 46, pp. 99–118.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cook, A.. ( 1985;), ‘ Dialectic, irony and myth in Plato’s Phaedrus. ’, American Journal of Philosophy, 106, Winter, pp. 427–41.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Curran, J. V.. ( 1986;), ‘ The rhetorical technique of Plato’s Phaedrus. ’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 19:1, pp. 86–72.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Debord, G.. ( [1967] 1994), Society of the Spectacle, London:: Rebel Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Durham, F.. ( 2017;), ‘ “The myth of unbiased journalism”, ethical perspectives on the news, Karl Cassell (moderator) with Frank Durham, Joe Sheller and Zack Kucharski, inter-religious council of Linn County. ’, YouTube , 23 January, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTzceHYA7_4. Accessed 1 February 2020.
19. Fox, J.. ( 2020), Age of the Image, Series 1 (2 March, UK:: BBC;).
    [Google Scholar]
20. Giesen, B.. ( 2013;), ‘ Iconic difference and seduction. ’, in J. C. Alexander,, D. Bartmaʼnski, and B. Giesen. (eds), Iconic Power: Materiality and Meaning in Social Life, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 203–18.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Havelock, E. A.. ( 1984;), ‘ The orality of Socrates & the literacy of Plato. ’, in E. Kelly. (ed.), New Essays on Socrates, New York:: America University Press;, pp. 67–93.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Havelock, E. A.. ( 1986), The Muse Learns to Write, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Havelock, E. A.. ( 1992), The Literate Revolution in Greece, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Johansen, J. D.. ( 1993), Dialogic Semiosis, Indianapolis, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Laclau, E.. ( [1994] 2015;), ‘ Why do empty signifiers matter to politics?. ’, in D. Howarth. (ed.), Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism & Critique, London:: Routledge;, pp. 66–74.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lyotard, J-F.. ( 1984), The Post-Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (eds G. Bennington, and B. Massumi.), Manchester:: Manchester University Press;, p. xxiii.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Margolis, J.. ( 1995), Interpretation Radical but Not Unruly: The New Puzzle of the Arts and History, Berkeley, CA:: California University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McCumber, J.. ( 1982;), ‘ Discourse & psyche in Plato’s Phaedrus. ’, Apeiron, 16, pp. 27–39.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Merleau-Ponty, M.. ( [1962] 1966), Phenomenology of Perception (trans. C. Smith.), London:: Routledge and K. Paul;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mitchell, W. J. T.. ( 1987), Iconology, Image, Text, Ideology, Chicago, IL:: Chicago University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Packard, V.. ( 1957), The Hidden Persuaders, Harmondsworth:: Penguin Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Peirce, C. S.. ( 1931–58), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (ed. C. Hartshorne,, P. Weiss, and A. W. Burke.), vols. 1–8, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Peirce, C. S.. ( 1998), The Essential Peirce, Vol. 2 (1893–1913) (ed. Peirce Project), Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Plato ( 1981), Plato: Five Dialogues (trans. G. M. A. Grube.), Indianapolis, IN:: Hackett Pub. Co;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Plato ( [1952] 1987;), ‘ Phaedrus. ’, in Plato’s Phaedrus (trans. R. Hackforth.), Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;, pp. 21–169.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ransdell, J. M.. ( 1979;), ‘ The epistemic function of iconicity in perception. ’, in J. E. Brock,, K. L. Ketner, and J. M. Ransdell. (eds), Peirce Studies No. 1: Studies in Peirce’s Semiotic: A Symposium by Member of the Institute for Studies in Pragmaticism, Lubbock, TX:: Institute for Studies in Pragmaticism;, pp. 51–66.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Ransdell, J. M.. ( 1986;), ‘ On Peirce’s conception of the iconic sign. ’, in P. Bouissac,, T. A. Sebeok, and M. Hetzfeld. (eds), Iconicity: Essays on the Nature of Culture, Tubingen:: Stauffenburg Verlag;, pp. 51–74.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rauch, A.. ( 2000), The Hieroglyph of Tradition, London:: Associated University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rose, G.. ( 2016), Visual Methodologies, , 4th ed.., London:: Sage Pub. Ltd;.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sartre, J. P.. ( 1972), Being and Nothingness (trans. H. E. Barnes.), London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Shusterman, R.. ( 1988;), ‘ Interpretation, intention and truth. ’, Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 46:3, pp. 399–411.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sini, C.. ( 2002;), ‘ Gesture and word. ’, in M. Verdicchio, and R. Burch. (eds), Between Philosophy and Poetry, New York:: Continuum Press;, pp. 15–25.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Smith, P. C.. ( 2002;), ‘ Plato’s Phaedrus & the Pharmakon revisited. ’, in M. Verdicchio, and R. Burch. (eds), Between Philosophy & Poetry, New York:: Continuum Press;, pp. 73–89.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sonesson, G.. ( 2009;), ‘ On the feasibility of pictorial statements. ’, Signata, 10, Jun, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Sztompka, P.. ( 2013;), ‘ Visible meanings. ’, in J. C. Alexander,, D. Bartmaʼnski, and B. Giesen. (eds), Iconic Power: Materiality and Meaning in Social Life, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 233–45.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Wimsatt, W. K., Jr., and Beardsley, M. C.. ( 1946;), ‘ The intentional fallacy. ’, Sewanee Review, 54:3&4, pp. 468–88.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. ( [1953] 1963), Philosophical Investigations, London:: Blackwell;.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Boulting, Noel. ( 2021;), ‘ Orality, writing, imagery and the rise of the imagistic. ’, Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 12:1, pp. 35–55, https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00027_1
    [Google Scholar]