Dialogue for Martin Buber and its importance in present geopolitical realities: A discourse analysis

References

1. Ballou, S. (2017), ‘Dialogical principles of Martin Buber’, Revista Estudios, 34, pp. 763–82, https://doi.org/10.15517/re.v0i34.29618.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bohm, D. (1996), On Dialogue, London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Buber, M. (2002), Between Man and Man (trans. R. G. Smith), London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Buber, M. (1947), Tales of the Hasidim, New York: Schocken Books.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Clark Winright, E. R. (1991), ‘Martin Buber’s I and Thou as model for relationship between artist and visual artwork’, Ph.D. dissertation, Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University, https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/2346/11312/31295006618838.pdf;sequence=1.
   [Google Scholar]
6. De Laval, S. (2006), Dialogue Methods: An Idea Manual, Stockholm: Vägverket, https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:trafikverket:diva-2195. Accessed 16 January 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Howell, D. (2015), ‘Dialogue and soft power in dangerous times’ in The Value of Dialogue in Times of Hostility and Insecurity, London: British Council, pp. 31–32. http://www.britishcouncil.org/researchinsight/value-dialogue. Accessed 4 April 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kulgami, S. S. (2018), ‘The role of dialogue in international relations’, The Geopolitics, https://thegeopolitics.com/the-role-of-dialogue-in-international-relations/. Accessed 16 January 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Mendes-Flohr, P. (ed.) (2015), Dialogue as a Trans-Disciplinary Concept: Martin Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue and its Contemporary Reception, Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbj7kb3.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Morgan, W. J. (2007), ‘Martin Buber: Philosopher of dialogue and of the resolution of conflict’, The British Academy Review, 10, pp. 11–14.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Morgan, W. J. and Guilherme, A. (2012), ‘I and Thou: The educational lessons of Martin Buber’s dialogue with the conflicts of his times’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44:9, pp. 979–96, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00681.x.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Price, P. B. (2015), ‘The value of dialogue in an age of soft power’, in The Value of Dialogue in Times of Hostility and Insecurity, London: British Council, pp. 18–19, https://www.britishcouncil.org/research-insight/value-dialogue. Accessed 15 January 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Pruitt, B. and Thomas, P. (2016), ‘Defining dialogue’, in Democratic Dialogue: A Handbook for Practitioners, New York, Stockholm, Washington DC and Quebec: UNDP-IDEA-OAS-CIDA, pp. 19–34, https://www.undp.org/latin-america/publications/democratic-dialogue-handbook-practitioners. Accessed 4 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Puoskari, E. and Rossi, A. (2019), Bridging Faiths and Worldviews through Dialogue, Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Romney, P. (n.d.), ‘What is dialogue?’, CLARK University, https://www2.clarku.edu/difficultdialogues/learn/index.cfm. Accessed 14 January 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Yaron, K. (1993), ‘Martin Buber’, Prospects, 23:1, pp. 135–46, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02195031.
    [Google Scholar]