Skip to content
1981
Volume 15, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 1757-1952
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1960

Abstract

This article brings Francesco Guicciardini (1483–1540) into the history of communication. The author argues Guicciardini should be added to the short list of Renaissance authors considered part of the so-called proto-history of public relations, like Machiavelli. In his work, the Italian author Guicciardini crafts several maxims and reflections that emphasize the importance of reputation in public and private affairs and how the use of communication and power can help to achieve a solid reputation. Ricordi’s communication menu includes advice about the importance of monitoring and cultivating public opinion, deeds, timing, context and information management. With certain nuances, immorality, as in the case of Machiavelli, seems to be the norm in this period, characterized by pragmatism. A main conclusion of this article is that Guicciardini belongs to a group of historical authors, alongside Machiavelli, Gracián and Cardinal Mazarino, who used communication management with a purpose of hegemony and control over publics on behalf of the powerful class. In fact, nobles, princes and kings used communication management, despite the differences the use of media technology imposes, in a similar fashion to current organizations and enterprises.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00062_1
2025-05-02
2026-04-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aula, P. and Mantere, S. (2020), Strategic Reputation Management: Towards a Company of Good, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnett, M., Jermier, J. and Lafferty, B. (2006), ‘Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape’, Corporate Reputation Review, 9:1, pp. 26–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Berlin, I. (1959), The Crooked Timber of Humanity, 1992 ed., New York: Vintage.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, A. (1994), ‘Introduction to Francesco Guicciardini,’ in F. Guicciardini (ed.), Dialogue on the Government of Florence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. vii–xxxii.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Butters, H. C. (2016), ‘Political allegiances and political structures in the writings of Niccolo Machiavelli and Francesco Guicciardini,’ in C. Shaw (ed.), Italy and the European Powers: The Impact of War, 1500–1530, Leiden: Brill Publishing, pp. 91–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Calina, N. and Grozoiu, L. (2021), ‘On Francesco Guicciardini’s thought and some of his considerations on Machiavelli’, Athens Journal of History, 7:4, pp. 257–68, https://doi.org/10.30958/ajhis.7-4-1.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. DeSanctis, F. (1873), Storia della letteratura italiana, Naples: Antonio Morano.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Doorley, J. and Garcia, H. F. (2020), Reputation Management: The Key to Successful Public Relations and Corporate Communication, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Domandi, M. (1964), ‘Translator’s preface,’ in F. Guicciardini (ed.), Maxims and Reflections (Ricordi), Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 33–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fombrun, C. J. (1996), Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. García, C. (2017), ‘Ethics and strategy: A communication response to Machiavelli’s The Prince in Baltasar Gracián’s The Pocket Oracle’, Public Relations Review, 43:1, pp. 172–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.11.005.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. García, C. (2020), ‘Cardinal Mazarin’s Breviary of politics: Exploring parallelisms between the Baroque and public relations in a post-truth society’, Public Relations Inquiry, 9:3, pp. 295–310, https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147x20920805.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Gargano, A. (2014), ‘La imagen de Fernando el Católico en el pensamiento histórico y político de Maquiavelo y Guicciardini,’ in A. Egido and J. E. Laplana (eds), La imagen de Fernando el Católico en la historia, la literatura y el arte, Zaragoza: Institución ‘Fernando el Católico’, pp. 83–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gilbert, F. (1965), Machiavelli and Guicciardini: Politics and History in Sixteen-Century Florence, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gracián, B. ([1637] 1995), A Pocket Mirror for Heroes, New York: Doubleday.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Guicciardini, F. (1936), Scritti autobiografi ci e rari, Bari: Laterza.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Guicciardini, F. ([1530] 1992), Maxims and Reflections (Ricordi), Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Harris, P. (2001), ‘Commentary: Machiavelli, political marketing and reinventing Government’, European Journal of Marketing, 35:9–10, pp. 1136–54, https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000005962.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Holmes, O. (1999), ‘Reading order in discord: Guicciardini’s Ricordi’, Italica, 76:3, pp. 314–34, https://doi.org/10.2307/479908.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Le Bon, G. ([1895] 2002), The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Machiavelli, N. ([1513] 1992), The Prince, New York: Everyman.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Mazarino, C. ([1697] 2016), Breviario de los políticos, Barcelona: Acantilado.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Moore, S. (2012), ‘Ideals and realities: Renaissance state communication in Machiavelli’s The Prince and More’s Utopia’, Public Relations Review, 38:3, pp. 383–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.11.009.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1980), The Spiral of Silence, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. OED (2006), Paperback Oxford English Dictionary, 6th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Passarini, L. (2022), ‘On the function of the aphoristic style in Ricordi by Francesco Guicciardini’, Montesquieu.it, 14:1, pp. 1–7, https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/14621.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Philips, M. (1984), ‘Francesco Guicciardini: The historian as aphorist’, Annali d’italianistica, 12, pp. 110–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. ‘reputation’ (1971), American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 8th ed., New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. ‘reputation’ (2023), Merriam-Webster, 6th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reputation. Accessed 17 March 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ridolfi, L. (1967), Life of Francesco Guicciardini, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul PLC.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O. and Petkova, A. P. (2010), ‘Reputation as an intangible asset: Reflections on theory and methods in two empirical studies of business school reputations’, Journal of Management, 36:3, pp. 610–19, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343208.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Rubinstein, N. (1965), ‘Introduction,’ in F. Guicciardini (ed.), Maxims and Reflections (Ricordi), Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 7–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Thomas, M. (2000), ‘Princely thoughts on Machiavelli, marketing and management’, European Journal of Marketing, 35:9–10, pp. 1136–54, https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010321901.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Tye, L. (1998), The Father of Spin: Edward Bernays & the Birth of Public Relations, New York: Crown Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Vercic, A. T., Vercic, D. and Znidar, K. (2016), ‘Exploring academic reputation: Is it a multidimensional construct?’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21:2, pp. 160–76, https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-01-2015-0003.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Walker, K. (2010), ‘A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: Definition, measurement, and theory’, Corporate Reputation Review, 12:4, pp. 357–87, https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2009.26.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Watson, T. (2008), ‘Creating the cult of a saint: Communication strategies in 10th century England’, Public Relations Review, 34:1, pp. 19–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.08.023.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Watson, T. (2014), ‘Let’s get dangerous: A review of current scholarship in public relations history’, Public Relations Review, 40:5, pp. 874–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.02.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Wilcox, D., Cameron, G., Reber, B. and Shin, J. (2013), Think PR, London: Pearson.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00062_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Guicciardini; history; philosophy; politics; public relations; publicity

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test