Skip to content
1981
image of Nietzsche and interpersonal communication: The significance of self-knowledge in interpersonal justice

Abstract

This article argues that Friedrich Nietzsche offers a generative contribution to communication ethics through his conception of self-knowledge as a rhetorical and symbolic practice. Drawing especially on and , the article interprets Nietzsche’s aesthetic ideal not as moral relativism, but as an ethical demand to become the kind of self who can relate justly. In contrast to rationalist or rule-based ethics, Nietzsche offers a model of intrapersonal justice grounded in coherence, stylistic integrity and symbolic self-formation. The article places Nietzsche in dialogue with communication ethics scholars, rhetorical theorists and the continental tradition, developing a view of justice as responsive presence rather than prescriptive conformity. By doing this, it advances an existential-ethical account of communication as the space where the self becomes answerable to the other. Nietzsche emerges not as an enemy of ethics, but as a thinker of moral formation whose insights deepen our understanding of rhetorical subjectivity and interpersonal responsibility.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00072_1
2026-02-23
2026-04-21

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnett, R. C. (2013), Communication Ethics in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt’s Rhetoric of Warning and Hope, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burke, K. (1969), A Rhetoric of Motives, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Canary, D. J., Cody, M. J. and Manusov, V. L. (2011), ‘Four important cognitive processes’, in K. M. Galvin (ed.), Making Connections, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 10717.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fritz, J. M. H. (2007), ‘Toward a theory of interpersonal justice’, The Meeting of the Pennsylvania Communication Association, State College, PA, 18–20 October.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fritz, J. M. H., McManus, L. M. B. and Kearney, M. R. (2023), Communication Ethics Literacy: Dialogue and Difference, 3rd ed., Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Levinas, E. ([1961] 1969), Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (trans. A. Lingis), Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nietzsche, F. ([1882] 2001), The Gay Science (ed. B. Williams, trans. J. Nauckhoff), New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nietzsche, F. ([1886] 2002), Beyond Good and Evil (eds R. P. Horstmann and J. Norman, trans. J. Norman), New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nietzsche, F. ([1888] 2005a), ‘Ecce homo: How to become what you are’, in A. Ridley and J. Norman (eds), The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols, and Other Writings (trans. J. Norman), New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69151.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nietzsche, F. ([1888] 2005b), ‘Twilight of the idols, or how to philosophize with a hammer’, in A. Ridley and J. Norman (eds), The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols, and Other Writings (trans. J. Norman), New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153229.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nietzsche, F. ([1887] 2017), On the Genealogy of Morality (ed. K. Ansell-Pearson, trans. C. Diethe), New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Simon, C. J. (1997), The Disciplined Heart: Love, Destiny & Imagination, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Taylor, C. (1989), Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00072_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test