Skip to content
1981
Volume 18, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 1539-7785
  • E-ISSN: 2048-0717

Abstract

The Edward Snowden revelations of leaked National Security Agency documents in 2013 received considerable attention in the scholarly and popular media. More recently, Facebook and other social media sites have come under scrutiny for their role in the 2016 US elections. Surveys of attitudes consistently indicate that Americans fear identity theft and other problems arising from Internet use. Yet Americans consistently turn over their personal data to Google, Facebook and other large companies. An important 2015 study of Internet browsing habits showed that users, after an initial concern with privacy-enhancing technologies following the Snowden revelations, quickly returned to sports and celebrity gossip as loci of interest. This article teases out reasons for the apparent contradiction. It uses Walter J. Ong’s work, Norbert Elias’s study of manners, along with more recent scholarship on privacy, on the early book trade and on aspects of the early modern period to argue that the contemporary concept of privacy is historically contingent. Historical circumstances and the development of certain technologies encouraged the development of privacy and the self. Current circumstances and technologies are contributing to their decay. This article grows out of two preliminary addresses, one given at the 2016 meeting of the Media Ecology Association in Bologna and the other at a meeting of the Gonzaga University Socratic Club in 2018.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eme.18.1-2.73_1
2019-03-01
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aries, P.. ( 1989;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in P. Aries. (ed.), A History of Private Life: Passions of the Renaissance, Cambridge:, Belknap/Harvard University Press;, pp. 113.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauml, F.. ( 1980;), ‘ Varieties and consequences of medieval literacy and illiteracy. ’, Speculum, 55:2, pp. 23765.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bentham, J.. ( 1791), Panopticon, or the Inspection-House, London:: T. Payne;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brouchard, C.. ( 1998), Strong of Body & Noble: Chivalry & Society in Medieval France, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burton, R.. ( 1628;), ‘ The anatomy of melancholy: What it is. With all the kindes, causes, symptomes, prognosticks, and seuerall cures of it. In three maine partitions, with their seuerall sections, members and subsections. Philosophically, medicinally, historically opened and cut vp, by Democritus Iunior. ’, The British Library;, https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/burtons-anatomy-of-melancholy-1628. Accessed 25 November 2018.
  6. Cain, C.. ( 2007;), ‘ Twilight of the books. ’, The New Yorker, 24 December, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/12/24/twilight-of-the-books. Accessed 25 November 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapman University ( 2018;), ‘ The Chapman University survey on American fears. ’, Chapman University, https://www.chapman.edu/wilkinson/research-centers/babbie-center/survey-american-fears.aspx. Accessed 24 November 2018.
  8. Chartier, R.. ( 1989;), ‘ The practical impact of writing. ’, in R. Chartier. (ed.), A History of Private Life: Passions of the Renaissance, Cambridge:: Belknap/Harvard University Press;, pp. 11160.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohn, N.. ( 1975), Europe’s Inner Demons, New York:: Basic Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Corbin, A.. ( 1989;), ‘ The secret of the individual. ’, in M. Perrot. (ed.), A History of Private Life: From the Fires of Revolution to the Great War, Cambridge:: Belknap/Harvard University Press;, pp. 457548.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Eire, C.. ( 2016), Reformations, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eisenstein, E.. ( 2005), The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Elias, N.. ( 1982), The Civilizing Process, Oxford:: Blackwell;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferraris, M.. ( 2013), Documentality: Why It Is Necessary to Leave Traces, New York:: Fordham University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Foucault, M.. ( 1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York:: Pantheon;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Foisil, M.. ( 1989;), ‘ The literature of intimacy. ’, in R. Chartier. (ed.), A History of Private Life: Passions of the Renaissance, Cambridge:: Belknap/Harvard University Press;, pp. 32762.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Frenkel, S.,, Confessore, N.,, Kang, C.,, Rosenberg, M., and Nicas, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Delay, deny, deflect: How Facebook’s leaders fought through crisis. ’, The New York Times, 14 November, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/14/technology/facebook-data-russia-election-racism.html. Accessed 25 November 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Greenberg, A.. ( 2014;), ‘ These are the emails that Snowden sent to first introduce his epic NSA leaks. ’, Wired, 13 October, http://www.wired.com/2014/10/snowdens-first-emails-to-poitras. Accessed 25 November 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Greenwald, G.. ( 2013;), ‘ The crux of the NSA story in one phrase: Collect it all. ’, The Guardian, 15 July, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/15/crux-nsa-collect-it-all. Accessed 25 November 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Havelock, E.. ( 1963), A Preface to Plato: A History of the Greek Mind, Cambridge:: Belknap/Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ledbetter, S.. ( 2014;), ‘ What Americans fear most – New poll from Chapman University. ’, Chapman University Press Room, https://blogs.chapman.edu/press-room/2014/10/20/what-americans-fear-most-new-poll-from-chapman-university. Accessed 24 November 2018.
  22. Lowry, M.. ( 1979), The World of Aldus Manutius: Business and Scholarship in Renaissance Venice, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Magno, A.. ( 2013), Bound in Venice: The Serene Republic and the Dawn of the Book, New York:: Europa Editions;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. McLuhan, M.. ( 1964), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York:: McGraw-Hill;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Montaigne, M.. ( 2004), Selected Essays, Ann Arbor, MI:: Borders Classics;.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Movieclips Indie ( 2014;), ‘ Citizenfour official trailer 1. ’, YouTube , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiGwAvd5mvM. Accessed 24 November 2019.
  27. Ong, W.. ( 1958), Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason, Cambridge:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ong, W.. ( 1967a), The Presence of the Word: Some Prolegomena for Cultural and Religious History, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ong, W.. ( 1967b), In the Human Grain: Further Explorations of Contemporary Culture, New York:: Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ong, W.. ( 1971), Romance, Rhetoric, and Technology: Studies in the Interaction of Expression and Culture, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ong, W.. ( 1977), Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ong, W.. ( 1982), Orality and Literacy, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Parry, M.. ( 1971), The Making of Homeric Verse, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Plato ( 1888a), The Republic (trans. B. Jowett) , The Internet Classics Archive, MIT, Cambridge;, http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.11.x.html. Accessed 26 July 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Plato ( 1888b), Phaedrus (trans. B. Jowett) , The Internet Classics Archive, MIT, Cambridge;, http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/phaedrus.html. Accessed 30 July 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Preibusch, S.. ( 2015;), ‘ Privacy behaviors after Snowden. ’, Communications of the ACM, 58:5, pp. 4855.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Quantified Self ( 2019;), ‘ Quantified self: Self-knowledge through numbers. ’, http://quantifiedself.com. Accessed 31 March 2019.
  38. Ranum, O.. ( 1989;), ‘ The refuges of intimacy. ’, in R. Chartier. (ed.), A History of Private Life: Passions of the Renaissance, Vol. 3 of A History of Private Life, Cambridge:: Belknap/Harvard University Press;, pp. 20764.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, A., and Anderson, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Social media use in 2018. ’, Pew Research Center;, 1 March 2018, http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018. Accessed 24 November 2018.
  40. Stables, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Best fitness tracker guide 2018: Fitbit, Garmin, Xiaomi and more. ’, Wareable, 26 December, https://www.wareable.com/fitness-trackers/the-best-fitness-tracker. Accessed 24 November 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Tomasello, M.. ( 2003;), ‘ Introduction: Some surprises for psychologists. ’, in The New Psychology of Language, vol. 2, Mawah, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum;, pp. 114.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Trevor-Roper, H. R.. ( 1969), The European Witch-Craze of the 16th and 17th Centuries, Harmondsworth:: Penguin;.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. U.S. Const. amend IV, Human Rights Library, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis , http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/education/all_amendments_usconst.htm. Accessed 25 November 2018.
  44. De Palma, P.. ( 2019;), ‘ The pre-modern self in post-modern times: The rhetoric of privacy in the work of Walter J. Ong, S.J.. ’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 18:1&2, pp. 7396, doi: 10.1386/eme.18.1-2.73_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/eme.18.1-2.73_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/eme.18.1-2.73_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Citizenfour; interiority; Ong; privacy; self; Snowden; speech; writing
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test