A multiparty imaginary dialogue about power and cybernetics¹

References

1. Bateson, G.. ( 1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind, New York:: Ballantine;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bateson, G.. ( 1974;), ‘ DRAFT: Scattered thoughts for a conference on “broken power”. ’, Co-Evolution Quarterly, 4 (December), pp. 26–27.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bateson, G.. ( 1978;), ‘ The birth of a matrix, or double bind and epistemology. ’, in M. Berger. (ed.), Beyond the Double Bind: Communication and Family Systems, Theories, and Techniques with Schizophrenics, New York:: Brunner/ Mazel Publishers;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bateson, G.. ( 1979), Mind and Nature, New York:: Bantam;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beck, U.. ( 1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London:: Sage Publications;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bird-David, N.. ( 1992;), ‘ Beyond “the hunting and gathering mode of subsistence”: Culture-sensitive observations on the Nayaka and other modern hunter-gatherers. ’, Man, 27:1 (March), pp. 19–44.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Erickson, M.,, Takeuchi, N., and Gilligan, S.. ( 2002), The Legacy of Milton H. Erickson, Phoenix, AZ:: Zeig, Tucker, and Theisen;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Foucault, M.. ( 1983;), ‘ The subject and power. ’ [Afterword], in H. L. Dreyfus, and P. Rabinow. (eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, , 2nd ed.., Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;, pp. 208–26.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Guddemi, P.. ( 2005;), ‘ The good, the bad, and the inverted: Rhetorical strategies in the portrayal of cultures in Ruth Benedict’s patterns of culture and Margaret Mead’s sex and temperament in three primitive societies. ’, Pacific Studies, 28:3&4, pp. 106–27.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Guddemi, P.. ( 2006;), ‘ Breaking the concept of power (and redescribing its Domain): Batesonian and autopoietic perspectives. ’, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 13:3&4, pp. 58–73.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Guddemi, P.. ( 2008;), ‘ “You are adapting more to me than I am adapting to you” (but what does more mean?): Cybernetic and Foucaultian explorations of the domain of power. ’, Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the ISSS, Madison, Wisconsin, July 13–18, http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings52nd/article/viewFile/939/328. Accessed 25 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Haley, J.. ( 1979;), ‘ Development of a theory: A history of a research project. ’, C. Sluzki, and D. Ransom. (eds), Double Bind: The Foundation of the Communicational Approach to the Family, New York:: Grune and Stratton;, pp. 59–104.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hobbes, T.. ( [1651] 1964), Leviathan (ed. F. P. Randall.), New York:: Washington Square Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Latour, B.. ( 2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford, New York:: Oxford University Press;, p. 69.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Layard, R.. ( 2005), Happiness: Lessons from a New Science, New York:: Penguin;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Marmot, M.. ( 2004), The Status Syndrome: How Social Standing Affects Our Health and Longevity, New York:: Times Books, Henry Holt and Company;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Maturana, H., and Varela, F.. ( 1992), The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Boston and London:: Shambhala;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Maturana, H., and Verden-Zoller, G.. ( 2008), The Origins of Humanness in the Biology of Love, Exeter:: Imprint Academic;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Midgley, M.. ( 1978), Beast and Man, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Sahlins, M.. ( 2008), The Western Illusion of Human Nature, Chicago, IL:: Prickly Paradigm Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sapolsky, R.. ( 2004;), ‘ Social status and health in humans and other animals. ’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, pp. 393–418.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Strum, S.. ( 1987), Almost Human: A Journey into the World of Baboons, New York:: Random House;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Weiner, N.. ( [1948] 1961), Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Guddemi, P.. ( 2019;), ‘ A multiparty imaginary dialogue about power and cybernetics. ’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 18:3, pp. 285–295, doi: 10.1386/eme.18.3.285_1
    [Google Scholar]