Skip to content
1981
Volume 19, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1539-7785
  • E-ISSN: 2048-0717

Abstract

Abstract

What constitutes ‘good’ posthuman research? This article offers three dynamics to help assess the value of posthuman-inspired inquiry. We propose that a good posthuman research account should show evidence that the researcher: (1) attended to their own more-than-humanness and made explicit how they interviewed and attuned to the nonhuman things of their inquiry; (2) reassembled resemblings of the posthuman world by inventively weaving and fusing human and nonhuman storylines; and (3) offered analytic insights into the liveliness of posthuman research work as the performativity of difference.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00050_7
2020-09-01
2024-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00050_7
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error