Volume 19, Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract

What constitutes ‘good’ posthuman research? This article offers three dynamics to help assess the value of posthuman-inspired inquiry. We propose that a good posthuman research account should show evidence that the researcher: (1) attended to their own more-than-humanness and made explicit how they interviewed and attuned to the nonhuman things of their inquiry; (2) reassembled resemblings of the posthuman world by inventively weaving and fusing human and nonhuman storylines; and (3) offered analytic insights into the liveliness of posthuman research work as the performativity of difference.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00050_7
2020-09-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00050_7
Loading
Keyword(s): credibility; more-than-human; posthuman; posthuman accounts; qualitative research; quality; rigour

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed