Public apologies and the psychodynamics of orality

References

1. Anon. ( 1998;), ‘ Clinton’s evolving apology for the Lewinsky affair. ’, CNN, 12 February, https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/02/12/apology. Accessed 8 August 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arendt, H.. ( 2013), The Human Condition, , 2nd ed.., Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aristotle ( 1991), On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baxter, L. A., and Montgomery, B. M.. ( 1996), Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics, New York:: Guilford Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carroll, R.. ( 2000;), ‘ Pope says sorry for sins of church. ’, The Guardian, 13 March, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/mar/13/catholicism.religion. Accessed 12 July 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Celermajer, D.. ( 2009), The Sins of the Nation and the Ritual of Apologies, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clinton, W.. ( 1998;), ‘ Special report: Clinton accused. ’, Washington Post, 9 February, https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/whatclintonsaid.htm 8.10.20. Accessed 8 August 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Corry, M. S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Burke, re-covenanting and the apology for the residential schools. ’, Rhetor: Journal of the Canadian Society for the Study of Rhetoric, 6:1, pp. 67–83.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cuypers, D.,, Janssen, D.,, Haers, J., and Segaert, B.. ( 2013), Public Apology between Ritual and Regret: Symbolic Excuses on False Pretences or True Reconciliation Out of Sincere Regret?, Amsterdam:: Rodopi Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Enright, R. D.. ( 2001), Forgiveness Is a Choice: A Step-by-Step Process for Resolving Anger and Restoring Hope, Washington:: American Psychological Association;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fry, D. B.. ( 1977), Homo Loquens: Man as a Talking Animal, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Garber, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Sorry, not sorry. ’, The Atlantic, December, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/12/sorry-no-apologies/600742. Accessed 8 August 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gardiner, N., and Roach, M. L.. ( 2011;), ‘ Barack Obama’s top 10 apologies: How the president has humiliated a superpower. ’, 2 June, https://www.heritage.org/europe/report/barack-obamas-top-10-apologies-how-the-president-has-humiliated-superpower. Accessed 8 August 2020.
14. Goffman, E.. ( 1971), Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order, New York:: Basic Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Griswold, C.. ( 2007), Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Harper, S.. ( 2008;), ‘ Debates (Hansard) No. 110. ’, transcript, June 11, House of Commons of Canada .
17. Harris, S.,, Grainger, K., and Mullany, L.. ( 2006;), ‘ The pragmatics of political apologies. ’, Discourse & Society, 17:6, pp. 715–37.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hearit, K.. ( 2006), Crisis Management by Apology: Corporate Responses to Allegations of Wrongdoing, Mahwah, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Heschel, A. J.. ( 1997), Moral Grandeur and Spiritual Audacity: Essays, New York:: Farrar, Straus and Giroux;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Holdner, M., and Kauffman, J.. ( 2014;), ‘ Getting out of the doghouse. The image repair strategies of Michael Vick. ’, Public Relations Review, 40:1, pp. 92–99, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.11.006. Accessed 13 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jonah 3: 1–10 ( 2007), The Catholic Bible: The New American Bible, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kearney, R.. ( 2004;), ‘ On the hermeneutics of evil. ’, in D. M. Kaplan. (ed.), Reading Ricoeur, New York:: SUNY Press;, pp. 71–88.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kings 8: 46–52 ( 2007), The Catholic Bible: The New American Bible, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lazare, A.. ( 2005), On Apology, Oxford and New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Leviticus 19: 17 ( 2007), The Catholic Bible: The New American Bible, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lunceford, B.. ( 2007;), ‘ The science of orality: Implications for rhetorical theory. ’, Review of Communication, 7:1, pp. 83–102.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Matthew 18: 21–22 ( 2007), The Catholic Bible: The New American Bible, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Merleau-Ponty, M.. ( 1962), Phenomenology of Perception, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Micah 7: 18–19 ( 2007), The Catholic Bible: The New American Bible, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Minow, M.. ( 1998), Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence, Boston, MA:: Beacon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Newman, L. E.. ( 2013;), ‘ Balancing justice and mercy. ’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 41:3, pp. 435–56.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Obama, B.. ( 2012;), ‘ Prayer vigil address at Sandy Hook, Newtown, CT. ’, transcript, 6 December, American Rhetoric, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/barackobama/barackobamanewtownvigilspeech.htm. Accessed 8 August 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Obama, B.. ( 2020;), ‘ President Barack Obama’s eulogy for John Lewis: Full transcript. ’, New York Times, 30 July, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/30/us/obama-eulogy-john-lewis-full-transcript.html. Accessed 8 August 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ong, W. J.. ( 1958), Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason, Cambridge:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ong, W. J.. ( 1965;), ‘ Oral residue in Tudor prose style. ’, PMLA, 80:3, pp. 145–54.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ong, W. J.. ( 1967), The Presence of the Word: Some Prolegomena for Cultural and Religious History, Cambridge:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Ong, W. J.. ( 1975;), ‘ The writer’s audience is always a fiction. ’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 90:1, pp. 9–21, 10.2307/461344. Accessed 13 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ong, W. J.. ( 1982), Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, Philadelphia, PA:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Ong, W. J.,, Farrell, T. J., and Soukup, A.. ( 2002), An Ong Reader: Challenges for Further Inquiry, New York:: Hampton Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Paul, G. D.. ( 2012;), ‘ “We must not think evil of this man”: A case study of Amish and English forgiveness. ’, Communication Quarterly, 60:3, pp. 424–44.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pauley, J.. ( 2010;), ‘ Review of the rhetoric of Pope John Paul II. ’, Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 13:2, pp. 163–65.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Psalm 51: 1–4 ( 2007), The Catholic Bible: The New American Bible, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Ransom, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Trump will not apologize for calling for death penalty over Central Park Five. ’, New York Times. 18 June, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/18/nyregion/central-park-five-trump.html. Accessed 13 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rood, C.. ( 2018;), ‘ “Our tears are not enough”: The warrant of the dead in the rhetoric of gun control. ’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 104:1, pp. 47–70.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Simons, M.. ( 1995;), ‘ Chirac affirms France’s guilt in fate of Jews. ’, New York Times, 17 July, https://www.nytimes.com/1995/07/17/world/chirac-affirms-france-s-guilt-in-fate-of-jews.html. Accessed 13 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Tavuchis, N.. ( 1991), Mea Culpa: A Sociology of Apology and Reconciliation, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Waldron, V. R., and Kelley, D. L.. ( 2008), Communicating Forgiveness, Thousand Oaks, CA:: SAGE;.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Zeidler, S.,, Merelli, A., and Fessler, L.. ( 2017;), ‘ We edited Louis C.K.’s “apology” to make it a real apology. ’, Quartz, 10 November, https://qz.com/1126593/we-edited-louis-cks-statement-on-sexual-misconduct-to-make-it-a-real-apology. Accessed 8 August 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Corry, M. Shivaun. ( 2021;), ‘ Public apologies and the psychodynamics of orality. ’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 20:3, pp. 285–98, https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00093_1
    [Google Scholar]