The internet as a sacred and irrational space within the Ellulian milieu of ‘technique’

References

1. Andersen, J., and Søe, S. O.. ( 2020;), ‘ Communicative actions we live by: The problem with fact-checking, tagging or flagging fake news: The case of Facebook. ’, European Journal of Communication, 35:2, pp. 126–39.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, J. W.. ( 1992;), ‘ Ellul on the need for symbolism. ’, The Ellul Studies Forum, 9, pp. 3–5.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bayer, J.. ( 2020;), ‘ Double harm to voters: Data-driven micro-targeting and democratic public discourse. ’, Internet Policy Review, 9:1, https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/double-harm-voters-data-driven-micro-targeting-and-democratic-public-discourse. Accessed 14 August 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bechtel, W., and Richardson, R. C.. ( 1998;), ‘ Vitalism. ’, in E. Craig. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London:: Routledge;, http://mechanism.ucsd.edu/teaching/philbio/vitalism.htm. Accessed 16 June 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Behrent, M. C.. ( 2013;), ‘ Foucault and technology. ’, History and Technology, 29:1, pp. 54–104.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bunge, M.. ( 1966;), ‘ Technology as applied science. ’, Technology and Culture, 7:3, pp. 329–47.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Christians, C. G.. ( 2011;), ‘ The philosophy of technology: Globalization and ethical universals. ’, Journalism Studies, 12:6, pp. 727–37.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cotgrove, S.. ( 1975;), ‘ Technology, rationality and domination. ’, Social Studies of Science, 5:1, pp. 55–78.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Debord, G.. ( 1994), The Society of the Spectacle, New York:: Zone Books;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. DeJong, D. J.. ( 2019;), ‘ The posthuman reality of feed-based social media systems. ’, doctoral dissertation, Toronto:: York University;, http://hdl.handle.net/10315/36337. Accessed 5 August 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ellul, J.. ( 1962;), ‘ The technological order. ’, Technology and Culture, 3:4, pp. 394–421.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ellul, J.. ( 1967), The Technological Society, New York:: Knopf;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ellul, J.. ( 1973), Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes, New York:: Vintage Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ellul, J.. ( 1975), The New Demons, New York:: Seabury Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ellul, J.. ( [1981] 1985), The Humiliation of the Word (trans. J. Hanks.), Grand Rapids, MI:: Eerdmans;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ellul, J.. ( 1989), What I Believe, Grand Rapids, MI:: Eerdmans;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ellul, J.. ( [1988] 1990), The Technological Bluff, Grand Rapids, MI:: Eerdmans;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ellul, J.. ( 2012), Hope in Time of Abandonment, Eugene, OR:: Wipf & Stock;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Feuerbach, L.. ( 1989), The Essence of Christianity, Buffalo, NY:: Prometheus Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Freuler, J. O.. ( 2018;), ‘ The present and future of a centralized internet. ’, OpenDemocracy , 13 March, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/digitaliberties/present-and-future-of-centralized-internet/. Accessed 20 June 2020.
21. Garrison, K.. ( 2012;), ‘ Ellul’s alternative theory of technology: Anticipating the fourth milieu of virtuality. ’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 11:1, pp. 57–72.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Greenman, S., and Toly N. J.. ( 2013), Understanding Jacques Ellul, Cambridge:: James Clarke & Co;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jarvie, I. C.. ( 1966;), ‘ The social character of technological problems: Comments on Skolimowski’s paper. ’, Technology and Culture, 7:3, pp. 384–90.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Josgrilberg, F.. ( 2011;), ‘ Between life-world and technical systems: Dialectics in the digital locus. ’, Canadian Journal of Communication, 36:2, pp. 295–310.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Keen, A.. ( 2015), The Internet Is Not the Answer, New York:: Atlantic Monthly Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Khanam, S.. ( 2018;), ‘ How memes construct realities through terministic screens. ’, doctoral thesis, Talahassee, FL:: Florida State University;, http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_libsubv1_scholarship_submission_1524871878_8c6e5841. Accessed 14 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lewin, D.. ( 2006;), ‘ Freedom and destiny in the philosophy of technology. ’, New Blackfriars, 87:1011, pp. 515–33.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lovekin, D.. ( 1977;), ‘ Jacques Ellul and the logic of technology. ’, Man and World, 10:3, pp. 251–72.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lynch, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ Social constructivism in science and technology studies. ’, Hum Stud, 39, pp. 101–12.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Marlin, R.. ( 1985;), ‘ Jacques Ellul’s lectures on forecasting and planning. ’, Futures Research Quarterly, Winter, 32, pp. 15–33.
    [Google Scholar]
31. McConnell, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ Rhetorical “slacktivism”: Activism in the age of social media. ’, Masters Essays, 36, http://collected.jcu.edu/mastersessays/36. Accessed 11 July 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Mitcham, C., and Mackey, R.. (eds), ( 1972), Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology, New York:: Collier Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Polat, R.. ( 2005;), ‘ The internet and political participation. ’, European Journal of Communication, 20, pp. 435–59.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Postman, N.. ( 1993), Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology, New York:: Vintage Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Schwab, K.. ( 2016), The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Geneva:: World Economic Forum;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Skolimowski, H.. ( 1966;), ‘ The structure of thinking in technology. ’, Technology and Culture, 7:3, pp. 371–83.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Stephens, N.. ( 2014;), ‘ Toward a more substantive media ecology: Postman’s metaphor versus posthuman futures. ’, International Journal of Communication, 8, pp. 2027–45.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Stivers, R.. ( 1982), Evil in Modern Myth and Ritual, Athens, GA:: University of Georgia Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Stivers, R.. ( 2001), Technology as Magic: The Triumph of the Irrational, New York:: Continuum;.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Stivers, R.. ( 2012;), ‘ The media creates us in its image. ’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 32:3, pp. 203–12.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Strate and Lum, K.. ( 2000;), ‘ Lewis Mumford and the ecology of technic. ’, New Jersey Journal of Communication, 8:1, pp. 56–78.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sumonja, M.. ( 2021;), ‘ Neoliberalism is not dead: On political implications of Covid-19. ’, Capital & Class, 45:2, pp. 215–27.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Terlizzese, L. J.. ( 2005), Hope in the Thought of Jacques Ellul, Eugene, OR:: Cascade Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Thompson, P.. ( 2012), Returning to Reality: Thomas Merton’s Wisdom for a Technological Age, Cambridge:: Lutterworth Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tolkien, J. R. R.. ( 1981;), ‘ Letter #131. ’, in H. Carpenter, and C. Tolkien. (eds), Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien: A Selection, London:: Allen & Unwin;.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Tufekci, Z.. ( 2012;), ‘ We were always human. ’, in N. Whitehead, and M. Wesch. (eds), Human No More: Digital Subjectivities, Unhuman Subjects, and the End of Anthropology, Boulder, CO:: University Press of Colorado;, pp. 33–47.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Warner, M.. ( 1986;), ‘ Nicolas Berdyaev: A consideration of his thought and influence. ’, thesis, Durham:: Durham University;, http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/6838/. Accessed 30 September 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
48. White, J.. ( 2020;), ‘ Technocracy after COVID-19. ’, Boston Review, http://bostonreview.net/politics/jonathan-white-technocracy-after-covid-19. Accessed 29 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
49. William, B., and Richardson, R. C.. ( 1998;), ‘ Vitalism. ’, in E. Craig. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Turner, Hossein. ( 2022;), ‘ The internet as a sacred and irrational space within the Ellulian milieu of “technique”. ’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 21:2&3, pp. 193–211, https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00129_1
    [Google Scholar]