Skip to content
1981
The Law and Communication Movement
  • ISSN: 1539-7785
  • E-ISSN: 2048-0717

Abstract

This article follows Innis, McLuhan and others in exploring the concept of space, but does so in relation to the survival and evolution of Canadian democracy within our emerging digital world. First considering the spatial implications of Canadian geography, the country’s constitution and institutions, along with the federal government’s spending power, it then considers those associated with economic staples and particularly how these affect our institutional infrastructure, especially in disturbing cases of ‘state capture’. Alongside identifying and addressing a number of concerns relating to digital space as now configured (and which will require fundamental reform), I also probe the concept of ‘inner space’ or interiority. I do this specifically in relation to its role as one of the most valuable resources of the digital age, not only in its commercial exploitation but also in terms of its defence: ultimately, in the service of mobilizing towards a more democratic culture. In demonstrating how Canada, following McLuhan, might function as a ‘counter-environment’ that makes the ‘world environment’ of the United States perceptible to its global occupants, I maintain that what we require is the exact same cultural remedy that Innis prescribed to counter the biases of the space-binding and time-annihilating electronic space of his own time. Namely, what is required is the retrieval of what Innis referred to as ‘oral tradition’, accompanied by the necessary and concomitant re-embedding of people within their local communities.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00139_1
2022-12-29
2026-04-22

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Babe, R.. ( 2015;), ‘ Innis’ great transformation: Staples thesis/medium theory. ’, Canadian Journal of Communication, 40:3, pp. 489–501.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonnett, J.. ( 2016), Emergence and Empire: Innis, Complexity, and the Trajectory of History, Montreal:: McGill University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Buxton, W., and Dickens, R.. ( 2016;), ‘ Harold Innis’ “crisis in public opinion”: Performance, retrieval, and the politics of knowledge. ’, Canadian Journal of Communication, 31:2, pp. 325–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Deibert, R.. ( 2020), Reset: Reclaiming the Internet for Civil Society, Toronto:: House of Anansi Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Grant, G.. ( [1965] 1982), Lament for a Nation: The Defeat of Canadian Nationalism, Ottawa:: Carleton University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Hedges, C.. ( 2009), Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle, Toronto:: Alfred A. Knopf;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Howley, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ Drone warfare: Twenty-first century empire and communications. ’, Media Tropes eJournal, 6:2, pp. 45–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Innis, H. A.. ( 1952a;), ‘ Roman law and the British empire. ’, in Changing Concepts of Time, Toronto:: University of Toronto Press;, pp. 47–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Innis, H. A.. ( 1952b;), ‘ The strategy of culture. ’, in Changing Concepts of Time, Toronto:: University of Toronto Press;, pp. 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Innis, H. A.. ( [1950] 1986), Empire and Communications, Victoria and Toronto:: Press Porcepic;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. McLuhan, M.. ( 1953;), ‘ Culture without literacy. ’, Explorations, 1, pp. 117–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. McLuhan, M.. ( 1980;), ‘ Living at the speed of light. ’, Maclean’s Magazine, 7 January, pp. 32–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. McLuhan, M.. ( [1964] 1994), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. McLuhan, M.. ( [1967] 2003;), ‘ Canada, the borderline case. ’, in Understanding Me: Lectures and Interviews, Toronto:: McClelland and Stewart;, pp. 105–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Page, K.. ( 2015), Unaccountable: Truth and Lies on Parliament Hill, Toronto:: The Penguin Group;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Pateman, C.. ( 1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Pateman, C.. ( 1985), The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critique of Liberal Theory, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Resnick, P.. ( 1984), Parliament vs. People: An Essay on Democracy and Canadian Political Culture, Vancouver:: New Star Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Resnick, P.. ( 1997), Twenty-First Century Democracy, Montreal and Kingston:: McGill-Queens University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Rose, P.. ( 2010;), ‘ Rene Girard as media ecologist. ’, in C. Anton. (ed.), Valuation and Media Ecology: Ethics and Morals, Cresskill, NJ:: Hampton Press;, pp. 91–122.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Rose, P.. ( 2017a;), ‘ Divinising technology and violence: Technopoly, the warfare state, and the revolution in military affairs. ’, in P. Rose. (ed.), Confronting Technopoly: Charting a Course Towards Human Survival, Bristol:: Intellect;, pp. 141–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Rose, P.. ( 2017b;), ‘ Technics, law, and morality at the speed of light: Communicating the precautionary principle. ’, Review of Communication, 17:4, pp. 288–302.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Rushkoff, D.. ( 2017), Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus: How Growth Became the Enemy of Prosperity, New York:: Portfolio/Penguin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Rushkoff, D.. ( 2019), Team Human, New York:: W. W. Norton;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Savoie, D.. ( 2019), Democracy in Canada: The Disintegration of Our Institutions, Montreal and Kingston:: McGill-Queens University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Strate, L.. ( 2011), On the Binding Biases of Time and Other Essays, Fort Worth, TX:: Institute of General Semantics;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Taft, K.. ( 2017), Oil’s Deep State: How the Petroleum Industry Undermines Democracy and Stops Action on Global Warming, Toronto:: James Lorimer and Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Taylor, C.. ( 1991), The Malaise of Modernity, Toronto:: House of Anansi Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Turkle, S.. ( 2015), Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age, New York:: Penguin Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Vanderburg, W.. ( 2018), Secular Nations under New Gods: Christianity’s Subversion by Technology and Politics, Toronto:: University of Toronto Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Wolf, Maryanne. ( 2018), Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World, New York:: Harper Collins;.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Rose, Phil. ( 2022;), ‘ Canada as counter-environment: Canadian democracy in a digital world. ’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 21:4, pp. 311–32, https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00139_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00139_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): digital authoritarianism; direct democracy; Innis; interiority; McLuhan; space

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test