Skip to content
1981
The Law and Communication Movement
  • ISSN: 1539-7785
  • E-ISSN: 2048-0717

Abstract

This article draws on the issue of digital sovereignty as a probe to explore the media scholarship of Marshall McLuhan as it relates to human sovereignty. Taking seriously McLuhan’s characterization of himself as a follower of Thomas Aquinas, the article argues that McLuhan’s application of gestalt psychology to culture and technology is analogical to Aquinas’s existential development of the figure–ground polarity central to Aristotelian hylomorphism. This structural equivalence allows us to understand McLuhan’s notion of ground in two primary senses – as acoustic and as tactile . I contend that conflating the of human artefacts with the of human artefacts obsolesces the structure of human perception, leading to a posthuman metaphysics that is at odds both with McLuhan’s humanistic message and with efforts to promote human sovereignty in the digital world.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00142_1
2022-12-29
2026-04-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aertsen, J.. ( 2012), Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought: From Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Suárez, Leiden:: Brill;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aquinas, T.. ( 1952–54), Questiones Disputatae de Veritate (trans. R. W. Mulligan, J. V. McGlynn and R. W. Schmidt), Chicago, IL:: Henry Regnery Company;, https://isidore.co/aquinas/QDdeVer.htm. Accessed 24 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aristotle ( 2007), The Metaphysics (trans. J. H. McMahon), Mineola, NY:: Dover Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Broadcasting and Telecommunications Legislative Review ( 2020), Canada’s Communications Future: Time to Act, Ottawa:: Government of Canada;, https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/110.nsf/eng/00012.html. Accessed 23 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cavell, R.. ( 2002), McLuhan in Space: A Cultural Geography, Toronto:: University of Toronto Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cavell, R.. ( 2016), Remediating McLuhan, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Danby-Smith, M.. ( 1969;), ‘ The scholastic doctrine of analogy. ’, master’s thesis, Hamilton:: McMaster University;, https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/handle/11375/10702. Accessed 24 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Deely, J.. ( 2001), Four Ages of Understanding, Toronto:: University of Toronto Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Denton, T.. ( 2020;), ‘ Broadcasting report proposes to wreck the internet with insane hubris and mad regulatory overreach. ’, Financial Post, 4 February, https://financialpost.com/opinion/broadcasting-report-proposes-to-wreck-the-internet-with-insane-hubris-and-mad-regulatory-overreach. Accessed 23 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Geist, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ The CRTC knows best: Panel report recommends costly overhaul of Canadian communications law to regulate internet sites and services worldwide. ’, Michael Geist, 30 January, https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2020/01/the-crtc-knows-best/. Accessed 23 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gilson, E.. ( 1949), Being and Some Philosophers, Toronto:: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gilson, E.. ( [1956] 1994), The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, New York:: Random House;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Gordon, W. T.. ( 1997), Marshall McLuhan: Escape into Understanding, Toronto:: Stoddart;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Goris, W., and Aertsen, J.. ( 2013;), ‘ Medieval theories of transcendentals. ’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/transcendentals-medieval/. Accessed 24 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Grodsky, N. C.,, Hildebrand, J. M., and Hakanen, E. A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Screens as human and non-human artefacts: Expanding the McLuhans’ tetrad. ’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 17:1, pp. 23–39, https://doi.org/10.1386/eme.17.1.23_1. Accessed 11 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ On sovereignty. ’, Medium, 19 February, https://medium.com/deep-code/on-jordan-peterson-and-the-future-51402a370d79. Accessed 25 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Harman, G.. ( 2009;), ‘ The McLuhans and metaphysics. ’, in J. K. B. Olsen,, E. Selinger, and S. Riis. (eds), New Waves in Philosophy of Technology, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 100–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Harman, G.. ( 2012;), ‘ Some paradoxes of McLuhan’s tetrad. ’, Umbr(a), 1, pp. 77–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kay, J.. ( 2020;), ‘ The federal government’s unsettling communications power grab. ’, National Post, 31 January, https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jonathan-kay-the-federal-governments-unsettling-communications-power-grab. Accessed 23 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. McLuhan, E.. ( 2011;), ‘ On formal cause. ’, in E. McLuhan, and M. McLuhan. (eds), Media and Formal Cause, Seattle, WA:: NeoPoiesis Press;, pp. 83–139.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. McLuhan, E.. ( 2015), The Sensus Communis, Synesthesia, and the Soul: An Odyssey, Toronto:: BPS Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. McLuhan, M.. ( 1962), The Gutenberg Galaxy, Toronto:: University of Toronto Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. McLuhan, M.. ( 1964), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York:: The Penguin Group;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. McLuhan, M.. ( 1971), McLuhan to Frederick Wilhelmsen, 10 March, Ottawa:: National Archives of Canada;, MG 31, D 156, 41, 38.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. McLuhan, M.. ( 1977;), ‘ The rise and fall of nature. ’, The Journal of Communication, 27:4, pp. 80–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. McLuhan, M.. ( 1987), Letters of Marshall McLuhan (eds M. Molinaro,, C. McLuhan, and W. Toye.), Toronto:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. McLuhan, M.. ( 1999), The Medium and the Light: Reflections on Religion, Toronto:: Stoddart;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. McLuhan, M.. ( 2005;), ‘ The medium is the message. ’, in W. T. Gordon. (ed.), Marshall McLuhan – Unbound (17), Corte Madera, CA:: Gingko Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. McLuhan, M.. ( 2011;), ‘ Eliot and the Manichean myth as poetry. ’, Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature, 64:1, pp. 125–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. McLuhan, M., and McLuhan, E.. ( 1988), Laws of Media: The New Science, Toronto:: University of Toronto Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. McLuhan, M., and McLuhan, E.. ( 2017), The Lost Tetrads of Marshall McLuhan, New York:: OR Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McLuhan, M., and Parker, H.. ( 1968), Through the Vanishing Point: Space in Poetry and Painting, New York:: Harper & Row;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. McLuhan, M., and Powers, B. R.. ( 1989), The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Peters, J. D.. ( 2011;), ‘ McLuhan’s grammatical theology. ’, The Canadian Journal of Communication, 36:2, pp. 227–42, https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2011v36n2a1967. Accessed 27 January 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Pugen, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ Extending the inner touch: Intimations of digital secondary literacy in McLuhan and Ong. ’, New Explorations, 1:2, pp. 134–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Ralon, L.. ( 2017;), ‘ From global village to global theater: The late McLuhan as a philosopher of difference, sense, and multiplicities. ’, Review of Communication, 17:4, pp. 303–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2017.1367825. Accessed 5 April 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sirota, L.. ( 2020;), ‘ Making a monster: A report on the future regulation of the internet proposes giving the CRTC overwhelming and unaccountable powers. ’, Double Aspect, 12 February, https://doubleaspect.blog/2020/02/12/making-a-monster/. Accessed 23 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Stearn, G. E.. (ed.) ( 1969), McLuhan: Hot and Cool, New York:: Signet Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Sutherland, T.. ( 2014;), ‘ The entelechies of media: Formal and material causality in media ecology. ’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 13:3&4, pp. 253–68, https://doi.org/10.1386/eme.13.3-4.253_1. Accessed 7 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Theall, D. F.. ( 2001), The Virtual Marshall McLuhan, Montreal and Kingston:: McGill – Queens University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Wachs, A.. ( 2015), The New Science of Communication: Reconsidering McLuhan’s Message for Our Modern Moment, Pittsburgh, PA:: Duquesne University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Wilhelmsen, F.. ( 1970), The Paradoxical Structure of Existence, Irving, TX:: The University of Dallas Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Pugen, Adam. ( 2022;), ‘ Hylomorphic McLuhan: One figure, two grounds. ’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 21:4, pp. 391–415, https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00142_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00142_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Aristotle; digital sovereignty; gestalt psychology; media ecology; perception; posthumanism; Thomas Aquinas

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test