Skip to content
1981
Volume 22, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1539-7785
  • E-ISSN: 2048-0717

Abstract

Toy unboxing videos are a popular and lucrative form of children’s entertainment on YouTube. This essay undertakes a media (auto)poetics of these videos and their relationship to children’s play through an integrated analysis of technology (media ecology), text (rhetorical criticism) and participant experience (autoethnography). Based on this analysis, I argue that toy unboxing videos foster and promote a form of ‘play as advertising’ via three key structural features: (1) repetition of the interest-excitement affect, (2) object fetishization and (3) direct address. In a concluding section of the essay, I reflect on the implications of the preceding analysis for digital media criticism, online advertising and children’s play.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00173_1
2023-11-29
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Benedetti, P. and Dehart, N. (1996), Forward through the Rearview Mirror: Reflections on and by Marshall McLuhan, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice (trans. R. Nice), New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Burgess, J. and Green, J. (2018), YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture (2nd ed.), Medford, MA: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke, K. (1953), Counter-statement (2nd ed.), Los Altos, CA: Hermes Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burke, K. (1966), Language as Symbolic Action: Essays of Life, Literature, and Method, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cezarita Cordeiro, V. (2021), ‘“Kidfluencers” and social media: The evolution of child exploitation in the digital age’, Humanium, 23 February, https://www.humanium.org/en/kidfluencers-and-social-media-the-evolution-of-child-exploitation-in-the-digital-age. Accessed 28 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chesebro, J. W. and Bertlesen, D. (1996), Analyzing Media: Communication Technologies as Symbolic and Cognitive Systems, New York: Guilford.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Craig, D. and Cunningham, S. (2017), ‘Toy unboxing: Living in a(n unregulated) material world’, Media International Australia, 163:1, pp. 7786, https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X17693700.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E. and Bochner, A. P. (2011), ‘Autoethnography: An overview’, Historical Social Research, 36:4, pp. 27390.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Freeman, J. and Dardis, F. (2022), ‘Kidfluencing: The role of calls to action, logo presence, and disclosure modality on parental appraisals’, Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 43:3, pp. 25673, https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2022.2037111.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Frosh, P. (2019), The Poetics of Digital Media, Medford, MA: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Garlen, J. C. and Hembruff, S. (2021), ‘Unboxing childhood: Risk and responsibility in the age of YouTube’, Journal of Childhood Studies, 46:2, pp. 7890, https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs462202119934.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goffman, E. (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gumbrecht, H. U. (2004), Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hausken, L. (2016), ‘My take on media aesthetics’, Sensorium Journal, 1, pp. 8191, https://doi.org/10.3384/sens.2002-3030.2016.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hawhee, D. (2009), Moving Bodies: Kenneth Burke at the Edges of Language, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Huizinga, J. (1955), Homo ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Izci, B., Jones, I., Özdemir, T. B., Alktebi, L. and Bakir, E. (2019), ‘YouTube & young children: Research, concerns and new directions’, in R. Brito and P. Dias (co-ords.), Crianças, famílias e tecnologias. Que desafios? Que caminhos?, Lisboa: Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudos Educacionais, pp. 8192, https://doi.org/10.34629/ipl.eselx.cap.livros.017.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Levinson, P. (1999), Digital McLuhan: A Guide to the Information Millennium, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Levinson, P. (2009), New Media, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Marciano, L. and Camerini, A. L. (2021), ‘Recommendations of screen time, sleep and physical activity: Associations with academic achievement in Swiss adolescents’, Public Health, 198, pp. 21117.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Marks, L. U. (2002), Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McLuhan, M. (1951), The Mechanical Bride: Folklore of Industrial Man, New York: Vanguard Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. McLuhan, M. and McLuhan, E. (1988), Laws of Media: The New Science, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meyrowitz, J. (1994), ‘Medium theory’, in D. Crowley and D. Mitchell (eds), Communication Theory Today, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 5077.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Miles, J. (2013), YouTube Marketing Power: How to Use Video to Find More Prospects, Launch Your Products, and Reach a Massive Audience, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mowlabocus, S. (2020), ‘“Let’s get this thing open”: The pleasures of unboxing videos’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23:4, pp. 56479, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549418810098.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nathanson, D. L. (2008), ‘Prologue’, in S. S. Tomkins (ed.), Affect Imagery Consciousness: The Complete Edition, New York: Springer Publishing, pp. xixxvi.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ong, W. J. (1977), Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ong, W. J. (2012), Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, 30th anniversary ed., New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ong, W. J. (2017), Language as Hermeneutic: A Primer on the Word and Digitization, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ott, B. L. (2010), ‘The visceral politics of V for vendetta: On political affect in cinema’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 27:1, pp. 3954, https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030903554359.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ott, B. L. (2017), ‘Affect in critical studies’, in J. F. Nussbaum (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, New York: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.56.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ott, B. L. (2023), ‘The digital mind: How computers (re)structure human consciousness’, Philosophies, 8:1, p. 4, https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8010004.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ott, B. L. and Dickinson, G. (2019), ‘Redefining rhetoric: Why matter matters’, Berlin Journal of Critical Theory, 3:1, pp. 4581.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ott, B. L. and Mack, R. L. (2020), Critical Media Studies: An Introduction (3rd ed.), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Poell, T., Nieborg, D. B. and Duffy, E. (2022), Platforms and Cultural Production, Medford, MA: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Rasmussen, E. R., Riggs, R. E. and Sauermilch, W. S. (2022), ‘Kidfluencer exposure, materialism, and U.S. tweens’ purchase of sponsored products’, Journal of Children and Media, 16:1, pp. 6877, https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1910053.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rose, E. (2007), ‘Paper or PowerPoint: How should media ecologists present their ideas?’, Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association, 8, pp. 5561.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Soukup, P. A. (2014), ‘Looking at, through, and with YouTube’, Communication Research Trends, 33:3, pp. 334.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Soules, M. (2015), Media, Persuasion and Propaganda, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Statista (2022), ‘Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2022, ranked by number of monthly active users’, https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users. Accessed 28 August 2022.
  43. Sutton-Smith, B. (1997), The Ambiguity of Play, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Tomkins, S. S. (2008), Affect Imagery Consciousness: The Complete Edition, New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018), Anti-social Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy, New York: Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. van den Berg, S. (2017), ‘Introduction’, in W. J. Ong (ed.), Language as Hermeneutic: A Primer on the Word and Digitization, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Doorn, N. (2010), ‘Keeping it real: User-generated pornography, gender reification, and visual pleasure’, International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 16:4, pp. 41130.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Velsaco, C. and Spence, C. (2019), Multisensory Packaging: Designing New Product Experiences, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. White, M. (2022), Touch Screen Theory: Digital Devices and Feelings, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00173_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00173_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test