High highs, low lows: Artists and anti-environments in the twenty-first century

References

1. Albrecht, R. and Tabone, C. (2020), The Arts and Play as Educational Media in the Digital Age, New York: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Benjamin, W. (1969), The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, New York: Schocken Books.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carey, J. (1983), ‘Technology and ideology: The case of the telegraph’, Prospects, 8, pp. 303–25.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carey, J. ([1989] 2009), Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society, New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carlin, J. (1988), Pop Apocalypse, brochure, New York: Gracie Mansion Gallery.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clowney, D. (2011), ‘Definitions of art and fine art’s historical origins’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 69:3, pp. 309–20.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Davies, S. (2001), ‘Definitions of art’, in B. Gaut and D. Lopes (eds), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, New York: Routledge, pp. 169–80.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Foucault, M. ([1977] 1995), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Vintage Books.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gibson, T. (2005), ‘Epilogue to Plato: The bias of literacy’, Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association, 6, pp. 1–17.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Havelock, E. (1963), Preface to Plato, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hobo Johnson (2018), ‘Peach Scone’, USA: Reprise Records.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hunt, A. (2013), Surviving Technopolis: Essays on Finding Balance in our New Man-Made Environments, Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kidder, J. L. (2011), Urban Flow: Bike Messengers and the City, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kittler, F. ([1999] 2010), Optical Media, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kuhns, W. (1971), The Post-Industrial Prophets: Interpretations of Technology, New York: Weybright and Talley.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Logan, R. K. (2002), ‘The five ages of communication’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 1:1, pp. 13–20.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Logan, R. K. (2016), Understanding New Media: Extending Marshall McLuhan, New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
18. McLean, C. (2022), ‘Who invented the internet? Everything you need to know about the history of the internet’, USA Today, 28 August, https://eu.usatoday.com/story/tech/2022/08/28/when-was-internet-created-who-invented-it/10268999002/. Accessed 5 March 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
19. McLuhan, M. (1962), The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of the Typographic Man, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. McLuhan, M. (1964), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. McLuhan, M. (2003), Understanding Me: Lectures and Interviews, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. McLuhan, M. and McLuhan, E. (2011), Media and Formal Cause, Houston, TX: NeoPoiesis Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Morrissey, C. S. (2019), ‘On the narcosis of narcissus’, McLuhan Galaxy, 13 June, https://mcluhangalaxy.wordpress.com/2019/06/13/narcissus-narcosis-autoamputation/. Accessed 13 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Ong, W. J. ([1958] 1983), Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ong, W. J. ([1982] 2005), Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Paglia, C. (1991), Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson, New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Paglia, C. (2002), ‘Cults and cosmic consciousness: Religious vision in the American 1960s’, Arion, 10:3, pp. 57–111.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Paglia, C. (2012), ‘Why Camille Paglia is alarmed about the future of art’, Smithsonian, November, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/why-camille-paglia-is-alarmed-about-the-future-of-art-79905670/. Accessed 13 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Postman, N. (1979), Teaching as a Conserving Activity, New York: Delacorte Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Postman, N. (1992), Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology, New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Price, S. (2016). ‘Walk this way: How RUN DMC and Aerosmith changed hip-hop’, The Guardian, 4 July.
32. Ran, F. (2005), ‘Media ecology and the arts’, Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association, 6, pp. 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Robertson, J. (2021), ‘Art in the 21st century’, Oxford Art Online, Oxford University Press, https://www.oxfordartonline.com/page/art-in-the-21st-century. Accessed 13 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Rose, P. (2014), ‘Musical counter-environments: Media ecology as art criticism’, International Journal of Communication, 8, pp. 2351–76.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Soja, E. (1996), Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Strate, L. (2004), ‘A media ecology review’, Communication Research Trends, 23:2, pp. 2–21.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Strate, L. (2012), ‘Counting electric sheep: Understanding information in the context of media ecology’, Information, 3:3, pp. 442–71.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Strate, L. (2017), Media Ecology: An Approach to Understanding the Human Condition, New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Suderberg, E. (2000), Space, Site, and Intervention: Situating Installation Art, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Theall, D. and Theall, J. (1988), ‘Marshall McLuhan and James Joyce: Beyond media’, Canadian Journal of Communication, 14:4, pp. 46–66.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wellman, M.L. (2020), ‘What is means to be a bodybuilder: Social media influencer labor and the construction of identity in bodybuilding’, The Communication Review, 23:4, pp. 273–89.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Wiederhorn, J. (2023), ‘19 years ago: Linkin Park crossed worlds with Jay-Z on “collision course”’, Loudwire, 30 November.