f Special Issue introduction: AI and media ecology

References

1. Anton, Corey (2019), ‘The relevance of RD Laing to the AI movement and to media ecology more generally: Projection and the feeling of being understood’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 18:3, pp. 213–34.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aristotle (1999), Nicomachean Ethics (trans. T. Irwin), 2nd ed., Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ‘artificial’ (2024), Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, 11th ed., Springfield: Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/artificial. Accessed 13 May 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ‘artificial’ (2024), OED Online, Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://www.oed.com/dictionary/artificial_adj?tl=true. Accessed 29 February 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ‘artificial’ (n.d.), Online Etymological Dictionary, Pennsylvania: Douglas Harper, https://www.etymonline.com/word/artificial. Accessed 13 May 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ‘artificial day’ (2024), OED Online, Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://www.oed.com/dictionary/artificial-day_n. Accessed 8 July 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ‘artificial intelligence’ (2024), Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, 11th ed., Springfield: Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/artificial%20intelligence. Accessed 13 May 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Carl, Noah and Menie, Michael (2019), ‘A scientometric analysis of controversies in the field of intelligence research’, Intelligence, 77, p. 101397.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cellan-Jones, Rory (2014), ‘Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind’, BBC News, 2 December, https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30290540. Accessed 29 February 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dreyfus, Hubert (1979), What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason, New York: Harper Colophon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gunkel, David (2012), The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Harper, Douglas (n.d.). ‘Etymology of artificial’, Online Etymological Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=artificial. Accessed 13 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
13. ‘intelligence’ (2017), Online Etymological Dictionary, Pennsylvania: Douglas Harper, https://www.etymonline.com/word/intelligent#etymonline_v_30069. Accessed 29 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lawson, Loraine (2023), ‘Neil deGrasse Tyson on AI fears and Pluto’s demotion’, The Newstack, 9 June, https://thenewstack.io/neil-degrasse-tyson-on-ai-fears-and-plutos-demotion/. Accessed 29 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Le Goff, Jacques (1980), Time, Work, and Culture in the Middle Ages, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Le Goff, Jacques (1992), The Medieval Imagination, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Legg, Shane and Hutter, Marcus (2007), ‘A collection of definitions of intelligence’, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 157, pp. 17–29.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Macnab, Geoffrey (2023), ‘Tim Burton on cancel culture and his Beetlejuice sequel’, The Independent UK, 9 September, https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/tim-burton-beetlejuice-2-johnny-depp-disney-b2406538.html.
    [Google Scholar]
19. McLuhan, Marshall and Watson, Wilfred (1970), From Cliché to Archetype, New York: Viking Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mumford, Lewis (1934), Technics and Civilization, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. O’Shiel, Daniel (2022), The Phenomenology of Virtual Technology: Perception and Imagination in a Digital Age, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ong, Walter J. (1982), Orality and Literacy, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ong, Walter J. (2018), Language as Hermeneutic: A Primer on the Word and Digitization, New York: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Petricini, Tiffany (2022), Friendship and Technology: A Philosophical Approach to Computer Mediated Communication, Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Petricini, Tiffany (2024), ‘ChatGPT: Everything to everyone all at once’, ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 4:3, pp. 340–50.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Postman, Neil (1999), Building a Bridge to the 18th Century: How the Past Can Improve the Future, New York: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Postman, Neil (2013), ‘Informing ourselves to death’, in M. Clough, J. Olson and D. Niederhauser (eds), The Nature of Technology: Implications for Teaching and Learning, Boston: Brill, pp. 5–14.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Richards, Isaac (2023), ‘The labyrinth: A Platonic dialogue on what’s next, featuring ChatGPT as Phaedrus’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 22:2, pp. 235–39.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rindermann, Heiner, Becker, David and Coyle, Thomas (2020), ‘Survey of expert opinion on intelligence: Intelligence research, experts’ background, controversial issues, and the media’, Intelligence, 78, p. 101406.
    [Google Scholar]
30. SAG-AFTRA Strike (2024), ‘Home page’, https://www.sagaftrastrike.org/. Accessed 24 January 2024.
31. Serpico, Davide (2021), ‘The cyclical return of the IQ controversy: Revisiting the lessons of the Resolution on genetics, race and intelligence’, Journal of the History of Biology, 54:2, pp. 199–228.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Strate, Lance (2017), Understanding Media Ecology: An Approach to Understanding the Human Condition, New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Susskind, Daniel (2020), A World Without Work: Technology, Automation and How We Should Respond, London: Penguin UK.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Susskind, Richard and Susskind, Daniel (2015), The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Professions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Tabery, James (2015), ‘Why is studying the genetics of intelligence so controversial?’, The Hastings Center Report, 45:5, pp. S9–14.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Zipf, Sarah, Petricini, Tiffany and Wu, Chuhao (2024), ‘AI monsters: An application to student and faculty knowledge and perceptions of generative AI’, in S. Elmoudden and J. S. Wrench (eds), The Role of Generative AI in the Communication Classroom, Hershey PA: IGI Global, pp. 284–99.
    [Google Scholar]