Exploring the paradox: Perceptions of AI in higher education – a study of hype and scandal

References

1. Baker, R. S. and Hawn, A. (2022), ‘Algorithmic bias in education’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4:32, pp. 1052–92, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D. and Raymond, L. R. (2023), Generative AI at Work, no w31161, National Bureau of Economic Research.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Celik, I. (2023), ‘Exploring the determinants of artificial intelligence (Ai) literacy: Digital divide, computational thinking, cognitive absorption’, Telematics and Informatics, 83, pp. 1–11.
   [Google Scholar]
4. China (2017), ‘New generation artificial intelligence development plan’ (‘国务院关于印发新一代人工智能发展规划的通知_科技_中国政府网’), www.gov.cn, 20 July, https://www.newamerica.org/cybersecurity-initiative/digichina/blog/full-translation-chinas-new-generation-artificial-intelligence-development-plan-2017/. Accessed 24 February 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chui, M., Hazan, E., Roberts, R., Singla, A., Smaje, K., Sukharevsky, A., Yee, L. and Zemmel, R. (2023), ‘The economic potential of generative AI’, June, http://dln.jaipuria.ac.in:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/14313/1/The-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2023.
6. Dakakni, D. and Safa, N. (2023), ‘Artificial intelligence in the L2 classroom: Implications and challenges on ethics and equity in higher education: A 21st century Pandora’s box’, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100179.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dhiman, B. (2003), ‘Key issues and new challenges in New Media Technology in 2023: A critical review’, Journal of Media & Management, 5:1, pp. 1–4.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Durán Del Fierro, F. (2023), ‘On the possibility of a public regime in higher education: Rethinking normative principles and policy frameworks’, Critical Studies in Education, 64:2, pp. 151–67.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Finland (2017), Finland’s Age of Artificial Intelligence: Turning Finland into a Leading Country in the Application of Artificial Intelligence: Objective and Recommendations for Measures, Helsinki: Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment 47/2017, TEMrap_47_2017_verkkojulkaisu.pdf (valtioneuvosto.fi).
   [Google Scholar]
10. Finland (2020), Artificial Intelligence 4.0, https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/policy-initiatives/http:%2F%2Faipo.oecd.org%2F2021-data-policyInitiatives-26932. Accessed 26 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
11. House Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Training (2023), Inquiry into the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Australian Education System (Cth), Canberra: Parliament of Australia (aph.gov.au).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Li, L., Sha, L., Li, Y., Raković, M., Rong, J., Joksimovic, S., Selwyn, N., Gašević, D. and Chen, G. (2023), ‘Moral machines or tyranny of the majority? A systematic review on predictive bias in education’, in I. Hilliger, H. Khosravi, B. Rienties and S. Dawson (eds), LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK 2023), Arlington, TX, USA, 13–17 March, Arlington, TX: ACM, pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1145/3576050.3576119.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lutz, C. (2019), ‘Digital inequalities in the age of artificial intelligence and big data’, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2:1, pp. 141–48, https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.140.
    [Google Scholar]
14. McLuhan, M. (1964), ‘Chapter 1: The medium is the message’, in Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 7–23.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Meskó, B. and Görög, M. (2020), ‘A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence’, npj Digital Medicine, 3, p. 126, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00333-z.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R. and Gerardou, F. S. (2023), ‘Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT’, Education Sciences, 13:9, p. 856, https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Moya, B., Eaton, S. E., Pethrick, H., Hayden, K. A., Brennan, R., Wiens, J., McDermott, B. and Lesage, J. (2023), ‘Academic integrity and artificial intelligence in higher education contexts: A rapid scoping review protocol’, Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 5:2, pp. 59–75.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Nardi, B. and O’Day, V. (1999), Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart, Boston, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2023), OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T. and Tacchi, J. (2015), Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Postman, N. (1979), Teaching as a Conserving Activity, New York: Delacorte Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Postman, N. and Charles Weingartner, C. (1969), Teaching as a Subversive Activity, New York: Delacorte Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Rane, N., Choudhary, S. and Rane, J. (2023), ‘Education 4.0 and 5.0: Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) for personalized and adaptive learning’, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4638365.
24. Schmidt-Crawford, D. A., Lindstrom, D. L. and Thompson, A. D. (2023), ‘AI in teacher education: What’s next?’, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39:4, pp. 180–81, https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2247308.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Scolari, C. A. (2012), ‘Media ecology: Exploring the metaphor to expand the theory’, Communication Theory, 22:2, pp. 204–25.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Smart Nation and Digital Government Office (2019), National Artificial Intelligence Strategy: Advancing Our Smart Nation Journey, Singapore: Smart Nation Singapore, https://file.go.gov.sg/nais2019.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Smart Nation and Digital Government Office (2023), Singapore National AI Strategy 2.0: AI for the Public Good for Singapore and the World, Singapore: Smart Nation Singapore, https://www.smartnation.gov.sg/nais/. Accessed 3 December 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
28. South, Korea (2020), Going beyond an IT Superpower to an AI Superpower, Seoul: National Strategy for AI, https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/policy-initiatives/http:%2F%2Faipo.oecd.org%2F2021-data-policyInitiatives-26497. Accessed 10 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Strate, L. (2006), Echoes and Reflections: On Media Ecology as a Field of Study, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean (IESALC) (2023), Harnessing the Era of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Primer for Higher Education Stakeholders, 6 September, UNESCO, https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/en/2023/09/06/primer-addresses-harnessing-the-era-of-artificial-intelligence-in-higher-education/. Accessed 17 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Yeo, M. A. (2023), ‘Academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence (AI) authoring apps’, TESOL Journal, 14:3, p. 3, https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.716.
    [Google Scholar]