The most precious possession: The place of analogy in the work of Marshall McLuhan

References

1. Adler, M. J. (1978), Aristotle for Everybody, New York: Touchstone.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anon. (2016), ‘Helen Jane Gooch Bret, 85, was devoted to education, church, the poor in Dallas’, Dallas News, 20 January, https://www.dallasnews.com/news/obituaries/2016/01/21/helen-jane-gooch-bret-85-was-devoted-to-education-church-the-poor-in-dallas/. Accessed 26 August 2024.
3. Anon. (2024a), ‘Equivocal’, Merriam-Webster.com, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equivocal. Accessed 20 August 2024.
4. Anon. (2024b), ‘Univocal’, Merriam-Webster.com, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/univocal. Accessed 20 August 2024.
5. Anon. (n.d.), ‘Homonym’, Dictionary.com, https://www.dictionary.com/browse/homonym. Accessed 2 September 2024.
6. Aquinas, T. (1952), De Veritate (trans. R. W. Mulligan), Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery Company, https://isidore.co/aquinas/QDdeVer.htm. Accessed 3 December 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Aquinas, T. (1998), ‘On the teacher’, in R. McInerny (ed.), Selected Writings (trans. R. McInerny), London: Penguin Books, pp. 193–216.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Aquinas, T. ([1920] 2017), The Summa Theologiæ of St. Thomas Aquinas (trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province), 2nd rev. ed., http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1013.htm. Accessed 6 December 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Aristotle (1984), ‘Rhetoric’, in The Rhetoric and Poetics of Aristotle (trans. W. R. Roberts), New York: The Modern Library, pp. 1–218.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Aristotle (2001), ‘Poetics’, in R. McKeon (ed.), The Basic Works of Aristotle (trans. I. Bywater), New York: The Modern Library, pp. 1455–87.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Berkman, P. (2020), ‘The McLuhans and the inner senses’, Dianoetikon, 1, pp. 49–68.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Betz, J. (2024), ‘From image to likeness: An essay in analogical anthropology’, Church Life Journal, https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/from-image-to-likeness-an-essay-in-analogical-anthropology/. Accessed 31 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bonanno, J. (2023), Walker Percy and the Crisis of Meaning, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Burke, K. (1969), Grammar of Motives, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bushinski, E. A. and Koren, H. J. ([1953] 2009), Translator and Collaborator Notes in Tommaso de Vio Cajetan’s The Analogy of Names, and The Concept of Being, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cajetan, T. ([1953] 2009), The Analogy of Names, and The Concept of Being (trans. E. A. Bushinski in collaboration with H. J. Koren), Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chrystall, A. B. (2014), ‘The later-McLuhan’s dialogue with the church’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 13:2, pp. 123–38, https://doi.org/10.1386/eme.13.2.123_1.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Farnsworth, W. (2018), The Practicing Stoic, Boston, MA: Godine.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Farrell, T. J. (2023), ‘Contextualizing Marshall McLuhan’, New Explorations, 3:1, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.7202/1097582ar.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gilson, É. ([1935] 1990), Methodical Realism: A Handbook for Beginning Realists (trans. P. Trower), San Francisco, CA: Ignatius.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gorman, M. R. S. C. J. (1962), General Semantics and Contemporary Thomism, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hall, E. T. (1976), Beyond Culture, New York: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Han, B. (2015), The Burnout Society (trans. E. Butler), Stanford, CA: Stanford Briefs.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Ijsseling, S. (1976), Rhetoric and Philosophy in Conflict (trans. P. Dunphy), The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kenner, H. (1948), Paradox in Chesterton, London: Sheed & Ward.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Korzybski, A. (1949), What I Believe, Garden City, NY: Country Life Press Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. ([1980] 2003), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Langer, S. K. ([1942] 1980), Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Liñán, L. T. (2017), ‘From Aristotle via Aquinas: Understanding formal cause in Marshall McLuhan’s philosophy’, in C. Anton, R. K. Logan and L. Strate (eds), Taking Up McLuhan’s Cause: Perspectives on Media and Formal Causality, Bristol: Intellect, pp. 85–92.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Maritain, J. (1948), ‘Sign and symbol’, in Ransoming the Time (trans. H. L. Binsse), New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, pp. 217–54.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Maritain, J. (2016), Art & Scholasticism (trans. J. F. Scanlan), Tacoma, WA: Cluny Media.
    [Google Scholar]
32. McEwen, C. (2017), ‘McLuhan’s realism 9: Where Chesterton comes in’, McLuhan’s New Sciences, 12 July, https://mcluhansnewsciences.com/mcluhan/2017/07/mcluhans-realism-9-where-chesterton-comes-in/. Accessed 29 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
33. McLuhan, E. (2011a), ‘Marshall McLuhan’s theory of communication: The yegg’, in E. McLuhan and M. McLuhan (eds), Theories of Communication, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 171–87.
    [Google Scholar]
34. McLuhan, E. (2011b), ‘St. Thomas Aquinas’s theory of communication’, in E. McLuhan and M. McLuhan (eds), Theories of Communication, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 53–65.
    [Google Scholar]
35. McLuhan, M. (1947), Introduction Hugh Kenner’s Paradox in Chesterton, New York: Sheed & Ward.
    [Google Scholar]
36. McLuhan, M. (1969), ‘Joyce, Mallarmé, and the press’, in E. McNamara (ed.), The Interior Landscape: The Literary Criticism of Marshall McLuhan, 1943–1962, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 5–21.
    [Google Scholar]
37. McLuhan, M. (1999), The Medium and the Light: Reflections on Religion, Toronto: Stoddart Publishing Co. Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
38. McLuhan, M. ([1951] 2001), The Mechanical Bride: Folklore of Industrial Man, Berkeley, CA: Gingko Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. McLuhan, M. ([1972] 2011), ‘Interview with Marshall McLuhan’, E-Compós, 14:3, pp. 1–13, https://www.e-compos.org.br/e-compos/article/download/845/610. Accessed 31 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
40. McLuhan, M. (2011c), ‘The emperor’s old clothes’, in E. McLuhan and M. McLuhan (eds), Theories of Communication, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 121–27.
    [Google Scholar]
41. McLuhan, M. ([1962] 2011), The Gutenberg Galaxy, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. McLuhan, M. ([1964] 2015), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, Berkeley, CA: Gingko Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. McLuhan, M. (n.d.), ‘Metaphor: The analogy of improper proportion’, unpublished manuscript, Ottawa: Library and Archives Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
44. McLuhan, M. and McLuhan, E. (1988), Laws of Media: The New Science, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. McLuhan, M. and McLuhan, E. (2017), The Lost Tetrads of Marshall McLuhan, New York: OR Books.
    [Google Scholar]
46. McLuhan, M. and Parker, H. (1968), Through the Vanishing Point: Space in Poetry and Painting, New York: Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Molinaro, M., McLuhan, C. and Toye, W. (1987), Letters of Marshall McLuhan, Toronto: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Morrissey, C. S. (2018), ‘The analogy of Marshall McLuhan’, in R. Heynickx, S. O’Connor and S. Symons (eds), So What’s New About Scholasticism? How Neo-Thomism Helped Shape the Twentieth Century, Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, pp. 231–53.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Ong, W. ([1967] 2000), The Presence of the Word: Some Prolegomena for Cultural and Religious History, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Ong, W. ([1971] 2013), Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology: Studies in the Interaction of Expression and Culture, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Percy, W. (1975), The Message in the Bottle: How Queer Man Is, How Queer Language Is, and What One Has to Do with the Other, New York: Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Phelan, G. B. ([1941] 2019), St. Thomas and Analogy, Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Plato (1997), ‘Republic’, in J. M. Cooper (ed.), Plato: Complete Works (trans. G. M. A. Grube and C. D. C. Reeve), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 971–1223.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Pound, E. ([1934] 2010), ABC of Reading, New York: A New Directions Paperback.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Sartre, J. (1956), Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology (trans. H. Barnes), New York: Philosophical Library.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Strate, L. (2017), Media Ecology: An Approach to Understanding the Human Condition, New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Taylor, C. (2007), A Secular Age, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Weaver, R. (1953), ‘Ultimate terms in contemporary rhetoric’, in Richard Weaver’s The Ethics of Rhetoric, Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery Company, pp. 211–32.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Wilhelmsen, F. ([1991] 2017), ‘Metaphysics as creativity’, in Being and Knowing: Reflections of a Thomist, London: Routledge, pp. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Wilhelmsen, F. D. and Bret, J. (1970), The War in Man: Media and Machines, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
    [Google Scholar]