Queer media ecology: A theory of disequilibrium and repair

References

1. Ahmed, S. (2006), Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahmed, S. (2019), What’s the Use? On the Uses of Use, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alihan, M. (1938), Social Ecology: A Critical Analysis, New York: Columbia University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anderson, C. W. (2016), ‘News ecosystems’, in T. Witschge (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Digital Journalism, London: Sage, pp. 410–23.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Angerer, M.-L. (2017), Ecology of Affect: Intensive Milieus and Contingent Encounters (trans. G. Jackson), Lüneburg: Meson Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Berlant, L. (2016), ‘The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34:3, pp. 393–419, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816645989.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Berlant, L. and Warner, M. (1998), ‘Sex in public’, Critical Inquiry, 24:2, pp. 547–66.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bersani, L. (2018), Receptive Bodies, Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Blas, Z. (2016), ‘Gay bombs: Getting started’, in D. Getsy (ed.), Queer, London and Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 105–09.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bowen, B. (2023), ‘Towards a critical media ecology: Gender and media ecology’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 22:3, pp. 305–29, https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00172_1.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cali, D. D. (2017), Mapping Media Ecology: Introduction to the Field, New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Collins, P. H. (2004), Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Collins, P. H. (2019), Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Crenshaw, K. (1991), ‘Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color’, Stanford Law Review, 43:6, pp. 1241–99, https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Eales, L. and Peers, D. (2021), ‘Care haunts, hurts, heals: The promiscuous poetics of queer crip mad care’, Journal of Lesbian Studies, 25:3, pp. 163–81, https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2020.1778849.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Eng, D. L., Muñoz, J. E. and Halberstam, J. (2005), ‘Introduction: What’s queer about queer studies now?’, Social Text, 23:3–4, pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-23-3-4_84-85-1.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fiorina, M. P. and Shepsle, K. A. (1982), ‘Equilibrium, disequilibrium, and the general possibility of a science of politics’, in P. C. Ordeshook and K. A. Shepsle (eds), Political Equilibrium, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 49–64.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fotopoulou, A. (2012), ‘Intersectionality queer studies and hybridity: Methodological frameworks for social research’, Journal of International Women’s Studies, 13:2, article 3, https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol13/iss2/3. Accessed 13 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fraser, N. (1990), ‘Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy’, Social Text, 25&26, pp. 56–80.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Friedland, L. A. (2001), ‘Communication, community, and democracy: Toward a theory of the communicatively integrated community’, Communication Research, 28:4, pp. 358–91.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fuller, M. (2005), Media Ecologies: Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gandy, M. (2012), ‘Queer ecology: Nature, sexuality, and heterotopic alliances’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30:4, pp. 727–47, https://doi.org/10.1068/d10511.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gentile, H. and Salerno, S. (2019), ‘Communicating intersectionality through creative claims making: The queer undocumented immigrant project’, Social Identities, 25:2, pp. 207–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2017.1376279.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gersick, C. J. G. (1991), ‘Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm’, The Academy of Management Review, 16:1, p. 10.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Halberstam, J. (2011), The Queer Art of Failure, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hatfield, J. E. (2021), ‘Trans* media ecology: The emergence of gender variant selfies in print’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 20:2, pp. 151–74, https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00082_1.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hawley, A. H. (1950), Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure, New York: Ronald Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Heaney, L. R. (2000), ‘Dynamic disequilibrium: A long-term, large-scale perspective on the equilibrium model of island biogeography: Long-term dynamics in island biogeography’, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 9:1, pp. 59–74.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Henderson, L. (2013), Love and Money: Queers, Class, and Cultural Production, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Howard, R. G. (2017), ‘GunNets: Why a theory of heterogeneous volition is necessary in the study of digital communication’, Cultural Analysis, 16:1, pp. 116–33.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Innis, H. A. (1951), The Bias of Communication, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Jarman, D. (1990), The Garden, UK: Artificial Eye.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Jarman, D. and Sooley, H. (1996), Derek Jarman’s Garden, London: Thames & Hudson.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Keeling, K. (2014), ‘Queer OS’, Cinema Journal, 53:2, pp. 152–57, https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2014.0004.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lewis, S. C. and Westlund, O. (2015), ‘Actors, actants, audiences, and activities in cross-media news work: A matrix and a research agenda’, Digital Journalism, 3:1, pp. 19–37.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Manning, J., Asante, G., Huerta Moreno, L., Johnson, R., LeMaster, B., Li, Y., Rudnick, J. J., Stern, D. M. and Young, S. (2020), ‘Queering communication studies: A journal of applied communication research forum’, Journal of Applied Communication Research 48:4, pp. 413–37.
    [Google Scholar]
38. McGlotten, S. (2022), Dragging: Or, in the Drag of a Queer Life, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. McKeithen, W. (2017), ‘Queer ecologies of home: Heteronormativity, speciesism, and the strange intimacies of crazy cat ladies’, Gender, Place & Culture, 24:1, pp. 122–34.
    [Google Scholar]
40. McLeod Rogers, J. (2021), ‘Susanne Langer, Marshall McLuhan and media ecology: Feminist principles in humanist projects’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 20:2, pp. 131–49, https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00081_1.
    [Google Scholar]
41. McLuhan, M. (1964), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York, Toronto and London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
42. McRuer, R. (2006), Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Mortimer-Sandilands, C. (2005), ‘Unnatural passions? Notes toward a queer ecology’, InVisible Culture, 9, https://www.rochester.edu/in_visible_culture/Issue_9/sandilands.html. Accessed 20 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Mortimer-Sandilands, C. (2008), ‘Queering ecocultural studies’, Cultural Studies, 22:3–4, pp. 455–76, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380802012567.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Mortimer-Sandilands, C. and Erickson, B. (2010), ‘Introduction: A genealogy of queer ecologies’, in C. Mortimer-Sandilands and B. Erickson (eds), Queer Ecologies: Sex, Nature, Politics, Desire, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–48.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Morton, T. (2010), ‘Queer ecology’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 125:2, pp. 273–82.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Muñoz, J. E. (2009), Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Nelson, M. (2016), The Argonauts, Minneapolis, MN: Graywolf Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Nguyen, M. (2003), ‘Queer cyborgs and new mutants: Race, sexuality, and prosthetic sociality in digital space’, in R. C. Lee and S. C. Wong (eds), Asian America.Net: Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Cyberspace, New York: Routledge, pp. 281–305.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Nystrom, C. L. (2021), The Genes of Culture: Towards a Theory of Symbols, Meaning and Media, New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Odum, E. P. and Barrett, G. W. (2005), Fundamentals of Ecology, 5th ed., Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Ong, W. J. (1982), Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Park, R. E. (1952), Human Communities: The City and Human Ecology, New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Payne, R. (2015), The Promiscuity of Network Culture: Queer Theory and Digital Media, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Postman, N. (1970), ‘The reformed English curriculum’, in A. C. Eurich (ed.), High School 1980: The Shape of the Future in American Secondary Education, New York: Pitman Publishing Corporation, pp. 160–68.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Postman, N. (1985), Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, New York: Viking.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Postman, N. (2000), ‘The humanism of media ecology’, Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association, 1, pp. 10–16.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Robinson, S. (2018), Networked News, Racial Divides: How Power and Privilege Shape Public Discourse in Progressive Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Robinson, S. and Wang, Y. (2018), ‘Networked news participation: Future pathways’, Media and Communication, 6:4, pp. 91–102.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Schnore, L. F. (1958), ‘Social morphology and human ecology’, American Journal of Sociology, 63:6, pp. 620–34.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Scolari, C. A. (2012), ‘Media ecology: Exploring the metaphor to expand the theory’, Communication Theory, 22:2, pp. 204–25.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Sedgwick, E. K. (1993), ‘Queer and now’, in Tendencies, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Sedgwick, E. K. (2003), ‘Paranoid reading and reparative reading, or, you’re so Paranoid, you probably think this article is about you’, in Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 123–52.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Seymour, N. (2013), Strange Natures: Futurity, Empathy, and the Queer Ecological Imagination, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Sharma, S. (2020), ‘A manifesto for the broken machine’, Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies, 35:2, pp. 171–79, https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-8359652.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Sharma, S. (2022), ‘Introduction: A feminist medium is the message’, in S. Sharma and R. Singh (eds), Re-Understanding Media: Feminist Extensions of Marshall McLuhan, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, pp. 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Smilges, J. L. (2023), Crip Negativity, Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Somerville, S. B. (2014), ‘Queer’, in B. Burgett and G. Hendler (eds), Keywords for American Cultural Studies, 2nd ed., New York: New York University Press, pp. 187–91.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Steiner, F. (2016), ‘Fundamental principles of human ecology’, in F. Steiner (ed.), Human Ecology: How Nature and Culture Shape Our World, Washington: Island Press, pp. 19–37.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Steyaert, C. (2010), ‘Queering space: Heterotopic life in Derek Jarman’s garden’, Gender, Work & Organization, 17:1, pp. 45–68, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00404.x.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Strate, L. (2004), ‘A media ecology review’, Communication Research Trends, 23:2, pp. 2–48.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Strate, L. (2017), ‘The human condition as the subject of media ecological investigation’, Review of Communication, 17:4, pp. 240–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2017.1367829.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Suchman, L. A. (2006), Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd ed., Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Wang, Y., Belair-Gagnon, V. and Holton, A. E. (2020), ‘The technologization of news acts in networked news participation: LGBT self-media in China’, International Journal of Communication, 14, pp. 4871–89.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Wiegman, R. (2014), ‘The times we’re in: Queer feminist criticism and the reparative “turn”’, Feminist Theory, 15:1, pp. 4–25, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113513081.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Xu, J. and Cornelissen, J. (2023), ‘Disequilibrium and complexity across scales: A patch-dynamics framework for organizational ecology’, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10:1, p. 211.
    [Google Scholar]