Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Explorations in Media Ecology
  4. Volume 23, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 23, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1539-7785
  • E-ISSN: 2048-0717

Abstract

In this article, we question how increasingly invasive emerging technologies will continue to shape, shift, benefit and/or constrain social movement organizing. In particular, we refer to organizations involved in the current abortion access movement in post- America. In this particular political climate, as the corporate demand for personal data grows alongside state surveillance, we wonder how organizations directly offering services, resources and information around abortion might continue to shift their practices. Time and again, technologies are wielded in innovative ways for liberation. However, we argue the rising popularity of ‘smart’ technologies presents unique challenges to the ongoing abortion access movement.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00225_7
2025-03-11
2025-03-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allyn, B. (2022), ‘Privacy advocates fear Google will be used to prosecute abortion seekers’, NPR, 11 July, https://www.npr.org/2022/07/11/1110391316/google-data-abortion-prosecutions. Accessed 20 June 2024.
  2. Campoamor, D. (2024), ‘Are “Roe-bots” the future of abortion access?’, Marie Claire, 26 March, https://www.marieclaire.com/politics/scotus-medication-abortion-roe-bots/. Accessed 20 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Charley (2024), ‘Need an abortion? Let’s get started’, Chat with Charley, https://www.chatwithcharley.org/. Accessed 20 June 2024.
  4. Cheung, K. (2024), ‘Robots – ahem, Roe-bots – provided abortion pills outside the Supreme Court today’, Jezebel, 26 March, https://www.jezebel.com/abortion-pill-providing-robots-outside-supreme-court-are-educating-people-about-shield-laws. Accessed 20 June 2024.
  5. Costanza-Chock, S. (2020), Design Justice: Community-led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Fentem, S. (2024), ‘Missouri Attorney General sues Planned Parenthood, alleging it arranged abortions for minors’, St. Louis Public Radio, 1 March, https://www.nprillinois.org/illinois/2024-03-01/missouri-attorney-general-sues-planned-parenthood-alleging-it-arranged-abortions-for-minors. Accessed 20 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Guttmacher Institute (2024), ‘State bans on abortion throughout pregnancy’, Guttmacher, 1 May, https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-policies-abortion-bans. Accessed 20 June 2024.
  8. Kelly, B. G. and Habib, M. (2023), ‘Missed period? The significance of period-tracking applications in a post-Roe America’, Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 31:4, https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2023.2238940.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Maheshwari, S. (2024), ‘Abortion groups say tech companies suppress posts and accounts’, New York Times, 11 June, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/11/business/abortion-groups-tech-platforms.html. Accessed 20 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. McCammon, S. (2023), ‘A Texas man sues ex-wife’s friends for allegedly helping her get abortion pills’, NPR, 13 March, https://www.npr.org/2023/03/13/1163028308/a-texas-man-sues-ex-wifes-friends-for-allegedly-helping-her-get-abortion-pills. Accessed 20 June 2024.
  11. McCluskey, M. (2023), ‘A Nebraska mother who provided an illegal abortion for her daughter and helped dispose of the fetus gets 2 years in prison, report says’, CNN, 23 September, https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/23/us/nebraska-abortion-pill-jessica-burgess/index.html. Accessed 20 June 2024.
  12. McLuhan, M. ([1964] 2006), ‘The medium is the message’, in M. G. Durham and D. M. Kellner (eds), Media and Cultural Studies: KeyWorks, rev. ed., Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 107–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Melnick, K. (2023), ‘Billboards tell I-55 drivers: “Abortion is OK, you are loved”’, Washington Post, 20 September, https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/09/20/shout-your-abortion-billboards-illinois/. Accessed 20 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Ng, A. (2022), ‘“A uniquely dangerous tool”: How Google’s data can help states track abortions’, Politico, 18 July, https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/18/google-data-states-track-abortions-00045906. Accessed 20 June 2024.
  15. Pagoto, S. L., Palmer, L. and Horwitz-Willis, N. (2023), ‘The next infodemic: Abortion misinformation’, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.2196/42582.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Postman, N. (2000), ‘The humanism of media ecology’, Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association, 1, pp. 10–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. RA Staff (2023), ‘This chatbot could help you with abortion information and options in your state’, Reform Austin, 16 September, https://www.reformaustin.org/tech/this-chatbot-could-help-you-with-abortion-information-and-options-in-your-state/. Accessed 20 June 2024.
  18. Rabinovitz, J., Rodin, D., Savage, H. and Kellenberg, R. (2024), An Analysis of Federal Funding for Crisis Pregnancy Centers: 2017–2023, Health Management Associates, https://www.healthmanagement.com/insights/briefs-reports/hma-paper-examines-federal-funding-streams-supporting-crisis-pregnancy-centers/. Accessed 20 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Richardson, A. V. (2020), Bearing Witness While Black: African Americans, Smartphones, and the New Protest #Journalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Sutherland, S. (2024), ‘Speculative texts and what’s next’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 23:1, pp. 47–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Treré, E. and Mattoni, A. (2016), Media ecologies and protest movements: Main perspectives and key lessons, Information, Communication & Society, 19:3, pp. 290–306.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Vinograd, C. (2016), ‘Abortion by air: Drone delivers pills across border to Northern Ireland’, NBC News, 21 June, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/abortion-drone-women-web-delivers-pills-northern-ireland-n596176. Accessed 20 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Zuboff, S. (2019), The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, New York City: PublicAffairs.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Missouri Abortion Fund (@MOAbortionFund) (2024), ‘Did someone say abortion freedom truck? Since no billboard companies will work with us- we had to get strategic’, X, 4 July, https://twitter.com/MOAbortionFund/status/1808877536702591046/photo/1. Accessed 20 June 2024.
/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00225_7
Loading
When data is dangerous: Emerging media and abortion access work in post-Roe America
Explorations in Media Ecology 23, 435 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00225_7
/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00225_7
/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00225_7
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): activism; digital privacy; information sharing; organizations; reproductive rights; Roe v. Wade; social movements; surveillance

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test