Skip to content
1981
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1743-5234
  • E-ISSN: 2040-090X

Abstract

Abstract

Students tend to over-conceptualize their interests/intentions at the starting point of any given or self-set project, foreclosing the movement and process of their thinking through projects’ time frames. The article introduces the author’s self-developed visual/material thinking methodology, and proposes a means of addressing a difficulty that educator-readers working in undergraduate contexts may themselves have experienced. The context of the article, a project with Thai university students, is presented as image and text inserts. The questions raised by the methodology are therefore presented as a parallel narrative of students’ responsive material. The article is written in tandem with the unfolding of a student group’s project. As the author moves to a track of the methodology that foregrounds movement, the presentational material shifts to the work of one student who critiques the methodology’s end-point in conceptualization, but supports the alternative track: the idea of Development as a more philosophical way forward.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eta.12.1.89_1
2016-03-01
2024-09-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eta.12.1.89_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): concept; development; ideas; movement; process; visual thinking
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error