The stool that became a tree: Reflecting on a collaborative student project in design education | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1743-5234
  • E-ISSN: 2040-090X

Abstract

Which possibilities are there for cultivating critical, creative, artistic and ethical thinking in collaboration with a major corporation in a student project? The project explored in this article involved first-year students enrolled in a BA product design course at the Oslo Metropolitan University. The research approach combined methods such as practice-led research with students, photo-elicitation interviews, autoethnographic writing and reflections. The article attends to potentials and failures in critical, creative and artistic practices that aim to challenge problematic modes of production in society today. The project initially set out to explore critical modes of creativity and making practices that are different from commercial design. However, the same project was embraced by Ikea, who both sponsored it and exhibited the final results. This embrace may have the effect of zeroing out, countering or incorporating attempts to be critical towards commercial design.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eta_00107_1
2022-09-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alvesson, Mats. ( 2003;), ‘ Methodology for close up studies: Struggling with closeness and closure. ’, Higher Education, 46:2, pp. 16793.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvesson, Mats, and Sköldberg, Kaj. ( 2009), Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, , 2nd ed.., London:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bilton, Chris. ( 2014;), ‘ Uncreativity: The shadow side of creativity. ’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21:2, pp. 115.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boltanski, Luc, and Chiapello, Ève. ( 2007), The New Spirit of Capitalism: Le Nouvel Esprit du Capitalisme, London:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Braae, Ellen, and Riesto, Svava. ( 2011;), ‘ As found a new design paradigm. ’, Nordic Journal of Architecture, 1, pp. 89.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Caillois, Roger, and Barash, Meyer. ( 2001), Man, Play, and Games: Les Jeux et les Hommes, Urbana, IL and Chicago, IL:: University of Illinois press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coombs, Gretchen,, McNamara, Andrew, and Sade, Gavin. (eds) ( 2018), Undesign: Critical Practices at the Intersection of Art and Design, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Costall, Alan. ( 2014;), ‘ Canonical affordances and creative agency. ’, in V. P. Glăveanu,, A. Gillespie, and J. Valsiner. (eds), Rethinking Creativity: Contributions from Social and Cultural Psychology, London:: Routledge;, pp. 4557.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cross, Nigel. ( 2011), Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work, London:: Bloomsbury Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Eno, Brian, and Schmidt, Peter. ( 1975), Oblique Strategies, London:: Brian Eno;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Flanagan, Mary. ( 2009), Critical Play: Radical Game Design, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Frers, Lars, and Meier, Lars. ( 2007), Encountering Urban Places: Visual and Material Performances in the City, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gibson, James J.. ( 2014), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition, London:: Psychology Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ham, Derek A.. ( 2016;), ‘ How designers play: The ludic modalities of the creative process. ’, Design Issues, 32:4, pp. 1628.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hammersley, Martyn, and Atkinson, Paul. ( 2019), Ethnography: Principles in Practice, , 4th ed.., London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haylock, Brad. ( 2019;), ‘ What is critical design?. ’, in G. Coombs,, A. McNamara, and G. Sade. (eds), Undesign: Critical Practices at the Intersection of Art and Design, London:: Routledge;, pp. 923.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Huizinga, Johan. ( 1971), Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture, Boston, MA:: Beacon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. IDEO ( 2003), IDEO Method Cards, San Francisco, CA:: William Stout Architectural Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Irwin, Rita L.. ( 2013;), ‘ Becoming a/r/tography. ’, Studies in Art Education, 54:3, pp. 198215.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jenkings, Neil K.,, Woodward, Rachel, and Winter, Trish. ( 2008;), ‘ The emergent production of analysis in photo elicitation: Pictures of military identity. ’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9:3, pp. 121, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1169. Accessed 6 April 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jørgensen, Kristine. ( 2014;), ‘ Devil`s plaything: On the boundary between playful and serious. ’, DiGRA Nordic ‘14: Proceedings of the 2014 International DiGRA Nordic Conference, Visby, 29–30 May.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kalin, Nadine M.. ( 2018), The Neoliberalization of Creativity Education: Democratizing, Destructing and Decreating, Creativity, Education and the Arts. , Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kvale, Steinar, and Brinkmann, Svend. ( 2009), Det Kvalitative Forskningsintervju (‘The qualitative research interview’, trans. T. M., Anderssen, and J., Rygge.), , 2nd ed.., Oslo:: Gyldendal akademisk;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LeBlanc, Natalie,, Davidson, Sara F.,, Ryu, Jee Y., and Irwin, Rita L.. ( 2015;), ‘ Becoming through a/r/tography, autobiography and stories in motion. ’, International Journal of Education Through Art, 11:3, pp. 35574.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McNamara, Andrew,, Coombs, Gretchen, and Sade, Gavin. ( 2018;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in G. Coombs,, A. McNamara, and G. Sade. (eds), Undesign: Critical Practices at the Intersection of Art and Design, London:: Routledge;, pp. 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mezirow, Jack, and Taylor, Edward W.. ( 2010), Transformative Learning in Practice: Insights from Community, Workplace, and Higher Education, San Francisco, CA:: Jossey-Bass;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Orr, Susan, and Shreeve, Alison. ( 2017), Art and Design Pedagogy in Higher Education: Knowledge, Values and Ambiguity in the Creative Curriculum, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Oslo Metropolitan University ( n.d;.), ‘ Produktdesign: Bachelorprogram. ’, OsloMet, https://www.oslomet.no/studier/tkd/produktdesign. Accessed 6 April 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rosner, Daniela, and Bean, Jonathan. ( 2009;), ‘ Learning from IKEA hacking: “Iʼm Not One to Decoupage a Tabletop and Call It a Day”. ’, CHI ‘09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA:, 4–9 April.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Stenros, Jaakko. ( 2015;), ‘ Playfulness, play, and games: A constructionist ludology approach. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Tampere:: Tampere University.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sutton-Smith, Brian. ( 2009), The Ambiguity of Play, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tracy, Sarah J.. ( 2010;), ‘ Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. ’, Qualitative Inquiry, 16:10, pp. 83751.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Vilhauer, Monica. ( 2010), Gadamer’s Ethics of Play: Hermeneutics and the Other, Lanham, MD:: Lexington Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Winnicott, Donald W.. ( 2012), Playing and Reality, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sjøvoll, Vibeke. ( 2022;), ‘ The stool that became a tree: Reflecting on a collaborative student project in design education. ’, International Journal of Education Through Art, 18:3, pp. 37793, https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00107_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/eta_00107_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/eta_00107_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error