‘Becoming a work of art’ revisited: Ecologies of collaboration in tertiary visual arts education¹

References

1. Atkinson, Dennis (2017), ‘Without criteria: Art and learning and the adventure of pedagogy’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36:2, pp. 141–52.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barad, Karen (2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bennett, Jane (2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bolt, Barbara (2013), ‘Toward a “New Materialism” through the arts’, in E. Barrett and B. Bolt (eds), Carnal Knowledge: Towards a ‘New Materialism’ through the Arts, London: I. B. Tauris, pp. 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Braidotti, Rosi (2013), The Posthuman, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Buckley, Brad and Conomos, John (2009), ‘Introduction’, in B. Buckley and J. Conomos (eds), Rethinking the Contemporary Art School: The Artist, the PhD, and the Academy, Halifax: The Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design, pp. 2–26.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Colebrook, Claire (1999), ‘A grammar of becoming: Strategy, subjectivism, and style’, in E. Grosz (ed.), Becomings: Explorations in Time, Memory, and Futures, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 117–41.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coole, Dianne and Frost, Samantha (2010), ‘Introducing the new materialisms’, in D. Coole and S. Frost (eds), New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics, London: Duke University Press, pp. 1–43.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Courchesne, Luc (2009), ‘Art, design and beyond’, in B. Buckley and J. Conomos (eds), Rethinking the Contemporary Art School: The Artist, the PhD and the Academy, Halifax: The Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design, pp. 136–44.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cutcher, Alexandra, Rousell, David and Cutter-Mackenzie, Amy (2015), ‘Findings, windings and entwinings: Cartographies of collaborative walking and encounter’, International Journal of Education Through Art, 11:3, pp. 449–58.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix (1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix (1994), What Is Philosophy?, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Deleuze, Gilles (1995), Negotiations: 1972–1990, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Demos, T. J. (2013), ‘Contemporary art and the politics of ecology: An introduction’, Third Text, 27:1, pp. 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Demos, T. J., Scott, E. E. and Banerjee, S. (eds) (2021), The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Art, Visual Culture, and Climate Change, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dolphijn, Rick and van der Tuin, Iris (2012), New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies (New Metaphysics), Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ewing, Lauren (2009), ‘Remixing the hive’, in B. Buckley and J. Conomos (eds), Rethinking the Contemporary Art School: The Artist, the PhD and the Academy, Halifax: The Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design, pp. 159–63.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Foster, Hal (1996), The Return of the Real, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Garoian, Charles R. (2012), ‘Sustaining sustainability: The pedagogical drift of art research and practice’, Studies in Art Education, 53:4, pp. 283–301.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Garoian, Charles R. (2014), ‘In the event that art and teaching encounter’, Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 56:1, pp. 384–96.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gaztambide-Fernandez, Ruben (2015), ‘Thinking beyond the human’, Curriculum Inquiry, 45:3, pp. 245–48.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Grimshaw, A. and Ravetz, A. (2015), ‘The ethnographic turn: And after: A critical approach towards the realignment of art and anthropology’, Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 23:4, pp. 418–34.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Henriksen, Danah, Creely, Edwin and Mehta, Rohit (2022), ‘Rethinking the politics of creativity: Posthumanism, indigeneity, and creativity beyond the western Anthropocene’, Qualitative Inquiry, 28:5, pp. 465–75.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hickey-Moody, Anna (2016), ‘A femifesta for posthuman art education: Visions and becomings’, in C. A. Taylor and C. Hughes (eds), Posthuman Research Practices in Education, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 258–66.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hickey-Moody, Anna, Palmer, Helen and Sayers, Esther (2016), ‘Diffractive pedagogies: Dancing across new materialist imaginaries’, Gender and Education, 28:2, pp. 213–29.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Horton, Jessica L. (2017), ‘Indigenous artists against the Anthropocene’, Art Journal, 76:2, pp. 48–69.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ingold, Tim (2013), Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jackson, Alecia Y. and Mazzei, Lisa A. (2013), ‘Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research’, Qualitative Inquiry, 19:4, pp. 261–71.
    [Google Scholar]
29. jagodzinski, jan and Wallin, Jason (2013), Arts-Based Research: A Critique and a Proposal, Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
30. jagodzinski, jan (2015), ‘Affirmations and limitations of Ranciere’s aesthetics: Questions for art and its education in the Anthropocene’, in N. Snaza and J. Weaver (eds), Posthumanism and Educational Research, New York: Routledge, pp. 121–33.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kallio-Tavin, Mira (2020), ‘Art education beyond anthropocentricism: The question of nonhuman animals in contemporary art and its education’, Studies in Art Education 61:4, pp. 298–311.
    [Google Scholar]
32. MacLure, Maggie (2013), ‘Researching without representation: Language and materiality in post qualitative methodology’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26:6, pp. 658–67.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Manning, Erin (2013), Always More Than One: Individuation’s Dance, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Manning, Erin (2015), ‘Artfulness’, in R. Grisin (ed.), The Nonhuman Turn, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 45–80.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Manning, Erin (2020), For a Pragmatics of the Useless, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Manning, Erin and Massumi, Brian (2014), Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Massumi, Brian (2011), Semblance and Event: Activist Philosophy and the Occurrent Arts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Massumi, Brian (2013), ‘Prelude’, in E. Manning (ed.), Always More Than One: Individuation’s Dance, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. ix–xxv.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Massumi, Brian (2015), The Politics of Affect, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Morton, Timothy (2016), Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pente, Patti, Adams, Catherine and Yuen, Connie (2022), ‘Artificial intelligence, ethics, and art education in a posthuman world’, in A. D. Knochel and A. Sahara (eds), Global Media Arts Education: Mapping Global Perspectives of Media Arts in Education, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 197–211.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Rousell, David (2015), ‘The cartographic network: Re-imagining university learning environments through the methodology of immersive cartography’, Multidisciplinary Research in the Arts, 5:1, pp. 1–33.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Rousell, David (2016), ‘Dwelling in the Anthropocene: Reimagining university learning environments in response to social and ecological change’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32:2, pp. 137–53.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rousell, David (2017), ‘Mapping the data event: A posthumanist approach to art|education|research in a regional university, in L. Knight and A. L. Cutcher (eds), Arts, Research, Education: Connections and Directions, New York: Springer International Publishing, pp. 203–20.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Rousell, David (2019), ‘Inhuman forms of life: On art as a problem for post-qualitative research’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32:7, pp. 887–908.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Rousell, David (2021), Immersive Cartography and Post-qualitative Inquiry: A Speculative Adventure into Research-Creation, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Rousell, David and Cutcher, Alexandra (2014), ‘Echoes of a c/a/r/tography: Mapping the practicum experience of pre-service visual arts teachers in the “Visual Echoes Project”’, Australian Art Education, 36:2, pp. 63–76.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Rousell, David and Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, Amy (2023), Posthuman Research Playspaces: Climate Child Imaginaries, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Rousell, David, Harris, Daniel X., Wise, Kit, MacDonald, Abbey and Vagg, Julie (2022), ‘Posthuman creativities: Democratizing creative educational experience beyond the human’, Review of Research in Education, 46:1, pp. 374–97.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Rousell, David, Hohti, Riikka, MacLure, Maggie and Chalk, Hannah-Lee (2021), ‘Blots on the Anthropocene: Micropolitical interventions with young people in a university museum’, Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies, 21:1, pp. 27–40.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Salazar, Stacey (2013), ‘Studio interior: Investigating undergraduate studio art teaching and learning’, Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 55:1, pp. 64–78.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Shaviro, Steven (2009), Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Shin, Ryan and Yang, Xuhao (2021), ‘A daoist pedagogy encountering new materialism in art education’, Studies in Art Education, 62:3, pp. 236–49.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Sholette, Gregory (1999), ‘Counting on your collective silence: Notes on activist art as collaborative practice’, Afterimage: The Journal of Media and Cultural Criticism, 27:3, pp. 18–20.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Song, Young Imm Kang (2009), ‘Community participatory ecological art and education’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28:1, pp. 4–13.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Snaza, Nathan and Weaver, John (eds) (2015), ‘Introduction: Education and the posthumanist turn’, in Posthumanism and Educational Research, New York: Routledge, pp. 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Snaza, Nathan, Sonu, Debbie, Truman, Sarah E. and Zaliwska, Zofia (eds) (2016), ‘Introduction’, in Pedagogical Matters: New Materialisms and Curriculum Studies, New York: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. xv–xxix.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Springgay, Stephanie and Rotas, Nikki (2015), ‘How do you make a classroom operate like a work of art? Deleuzeguattarian methodologies of research-creation’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28:5, pp. 552–72.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Stengers, Isabelle (2005), ‘Introductory notes on an ecology of practices’, Cultural Studies Review, 11:1, pp. 183–96.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Stengers, Isabelle (2011), Thinking with Whitehead: A Free and Wild Creation of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. St. Pierre, Elizabeth (2013), ‘The posts continue: Becoming’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26:6, pp. 646–57.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Taylor, Affrica and Veronica, Pacini-Ketchabaw (2015), ‘Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability’, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23:4, pp. 507–29.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Thompson, Nato (2012), Living as Form: Socially Engaged Art from 1991–2011, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Tironi, Manuel (2019), ‘Lithic abstractions: Geophysical operations against the Anthropocene’, Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 20:3, pp. 284–300.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Todd, Zoe (2016), ‘An indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: “Ontology” is just another word for colonialism’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 29:1, pp. 4–22.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Truman, Sarah E. (2021), Feminist Speculations and the Practice of Research-Creation: Writing Pedagogies and Intertextual Affects, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Tytler, Cassandra (2022), ‘We found a body: The intrabody of human, technology, narrative and environment as postqualitative inquiry’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 38:3–4, pp. 242–50.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Vaughan, Kathleen, Lévesque, Michel, Szabad-Smyth, Linda, Garnet, Dustin, Fitch, Sebastien and Sinner, Anita (2017), ‘A history of community art education at Concordia University: Educating the artist-teacher through practice and collaboration’, Studies in Art Education, 58:1, pp. 28–38.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Whitehead, Alfred North (1978), Process and Reality, New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Wong, Samson Kei Shun (2019), ‘Applying an ethological perspective of art to the community arts and socially engaged arts’, Journal of Visual Art Practice, 18:3, pp. 205–20.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Woods, Peter J. (2020), ‘Reimagining collaboration through the lens of the posthuman: Uncovering embodied learning in noise music’, Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 18:1, pp. 45–65.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Yusoff, Kathryn (2019), A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Zepke, Stephen (2005), The Abstract Machine: Art and Ontology in Deleuze and Guattari, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]