Skip to content
1981
Celebrating 20 years of IJETA
  • ISSN: 1743-5234
  • E-ISSN: 2040-090X

Abstract

A broad range of community art projects and programmes have been documented around the world since I first reported on this project in 2012. However, it still remains that lack of time and/or funding means that most art teachers are unable to engage in community arts or generate resources and opportunities to teach community arts. This means that unless community art projects directly engage schools and teachers in their projects and time is put aside for students and teachers to go on excursions, visit sites and engage with these communities, there are few opportunities for students to engage in community arts-based learning. This article reports on an innovative community art project that engaged narrative, and sculptural form, as a way of learning about community, place and identity. The project is explained from the perspective of an art educator, researcher and artist who was employed in the project both as community artist and as facilitator. This ‘insider’s perspective’ aims to afford some context to relevant theories through which such projects can be understood as potentially beneficial to art education – particularly in the way people have used narrative to communicate issues of place and the ways in which artists have translated community narratives into sculptural form. The author’s insider perspective offers insight into this project to share how a community art project could be designed and facilitated for students to engage in their local region and therefore a way forward for teachers and students to engage in something similar, to learn about how community stories can be translated into contemporary art, and the important role of place and identity in this work.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eta_00154_1
2024-03-04
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Austin, J. (2008), ‘Training community artists in Scotland’, in G. Coutts and T. Jokela (eds), Art, Community and Environment: Educational Perspectives, Bristol: Intellect Ltd, pp. 175–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourriaud, N. (2002), Relational Aesthetics, Paris: Les Presses du Réel.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Byrne, L., Edquist, H. and Vaughan, L. (eds) (2010), Designing Place, Melbourne: Melbourne Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Casey, E. (1993), Getting Back into Place: Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-World, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Casey, E. (2005), Earth-Mapping: Artists Reshaping Landscape, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Connelly, F. M. and Clandinin, D. J. (2006), ‘Narrative inquiry’, in J. Green, G. Camilli and P. Elmore (eds), Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 375–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dawes, M. (2008), ‘Beyond process, art, empowerment and sustainability’, in G. Coutts and T. Jokela (eds), Art, Community and Environment: Educational Perspectives, Bristol: Intellect Ltd, pp. 65–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Fischer-Rosenthal, W. (2000), ‘Address lost: How to fix lives: Biographical structuring in the European modern age’, in R. Brechner, D. Kalekin-Fishman and I. Miethe (eds), Biographies and the Division of Europe: Experience, Action and Change on the ‘Eastern Side’, Opladen: Leske Budrich, pp. 55–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Hannigan, S. (2009), ‘Connecting Identities artwork interpretive signage’, City of Greater Geelong Archives, City of Greater Geelong, http://www.geelongaustralia.com.au/ct/tag/article/item/8cdd2da3. Accessed 15 January 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Inei, R. (2009), ‘Connecting Identities artwork interpretive signage’, City of Greater Geelong Archives, City of Greater Geelong, http://www.geelongaustralia.com.au/ct/tag/article/item/8cdd2da3. Accessed 15 January 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Jokela, T. (2008), ‘A wanderer in the landscape: Reflections on the relationship between art and the northern environment’, in G. Coutts and T. Jokela (eds), Art, Community and Environment: Educational Perspectives, Bristol: Intellect Ltd, pp. 3–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Josselson, R. (2004), ‘The hermeneutics of faith and the hermeneutics of suspicion’, Narrative Inquiry, 14:1, pp. 1–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kwon, M. (2004), One Place After Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Leitch, J. (2009), ‘Connecting Identities artwork interpretive signage’, City of Greater Geelong Archives, City of Greater Geelong, http://www.geelongaustralia.com.au/ct/tag/article/item/8cdd2da3. Accessed 15 January 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Lippard, L. (1997), The Lure of the Local, Senses of Place in a Multicentred Society, New York: The New Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Malpas, J. E. (1999), Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Malpas, J. E. (2006), Heidegger’s Topology, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. McAdams, D. (1996), ‘Personality, modernity, and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons’, Psychological Inquiry, 7:4, pp. 295–321.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. McAdams, D. P. (2008), ‘Personal narratives and the life story’, in P. John, R. W. Robins, L. A. Pervin and J. Oliver (eds), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 3rd ed., New York: Guilford Press, pp. 242–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. McAdams, D. P. and Logan, R. (2006), ‘Creative work, love, and the dialectics in selected life stories of academics’, in D. P. McAdams, R. Josselson and A. Lieblich (eds), Identity and Story Creating Self in Narrative, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 89–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Monument Australia (2010), ‘Bunjil’, https://www.monumentaustralia.org.au/display/96636-bunjil-geoglyph. Accessed 4 January 2024.
  22. Ross, T. (2006), ‘Aesthetics autonomy and interdisciplinarity: A response to Nicolas Bourriaud’s “relational aesthetics”’, Journal of Visual Art Practice, 5:3, pp. 167–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Springgay, S., Irwin, R. and Wilson Kind, S. (2005), ‘Artography as living inquiry: Through art and text’, Qualitative Inquiry, 11:6, pp. 879–912.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Stephens, C. (2009), ‘Connecting Identities artwork interpretive signage’, City of Greater Geelong Archives, City of Greater Geelong, http://www.geelongaustralia.com.au/ct/tag/article/item/8cdd2da3. Accessed 15 January 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Sullivan, G. (2005), Art Practice as Research, London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Tuan, Y. (1977), Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/eta_00154_1
Loading
Turning community stories into community art1
International Journal of Education Through Art 20, 101 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00154_1
/content/journals/10.1386/eta_00154_1
/content/journals/10.1386/eta_00154_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): art education; Australia; community art; identity; narrative; place

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test