A content analysis of K-12 visual arts standards: Investigating ecological integration

References

1. Aikenhead, Glen, Calabrese, Angela and Chin, Pauline (2006), ‘Forum: Toward a politics of place-based science education’, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, pp. 403–16.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson, Tom and Suominen Guyas, Anniina (2012), ‘Earth education, interbeing, and deep ecology’, Studies in Art Education, 53:3, pp. 223–45.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bae-Dimitriadis, Michelle (2021), ‘Land-based art criticism: (Un)learning land through art’, Visual Arts Research, 47:2, pp. 102–14.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bertling, Joy (2015), ‘The art of empathy: A mixed methods case study of a critical place-based art education program’, International Journal of Education & the Arts, 16:13, pp. 1–26.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bertling, Joy (2023), Art Education for a Sustainable Planet: Embracing Ecopedagogy in K-12 Classrooms, New York: Teachers College Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bertling, Joy and Moore, Tara (2020), ‘U.S. art teacher education in the age of the anthropocene’, Studies in Art Education, 61:1, pp. 46–63.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bertling, Joy and Moore, Tara (2021a), ‘The United States K-12 art education curricular landscape: A nationwide survey’, Studies in Art Education, 62:1, pp. 23–46.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bertling, Joy and Moore, Tara (2021b), ‘A portrait of environmental integration in United States K-12 art education’, Environmental Education Research, 27:3, pp. 382–401.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Boeckel, Jan van (2015), ‘At the heart of art and Earth: An exploration of practices in arts-based environmental education’, Environmental Education Research, 21:5, pp. 801–02.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Carter, Jill (2013), ‘The status of environmental education in Illinois public high school science and social studies classrooms’, Ph.D. thesis, Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Charmaz, Kathy (2006), ‘Coding in grounded theory practice’, in K. Charmaz (ed.), Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 42–71.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Coats, Cala, Singha, Shagun, Zuiker, Steven and Riske, Amanda (2022), ‘Time unbound: Framing encounters for embodied connection and ecological imagination’, Studies in Art Education, 63:4, pp. 330–45.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Conkey, April and Green, Marybeth (2018), ‘Using place-based art education to engage students in learning about food webs’, Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 21, October, pp. 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Davis, Susan (2018), ‘The engagement tree: Arts-based pedagogies for environmental learning’, International Journal of Education & the Arts, 19:8, pp. 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Education Commission of the States (2023), ‘50-state comparison’, March, https://reports.ecs.org/comparisons/artscan-2023-summaries. Accessed 12 January 2024.
16. Garoian, Charles (1998), ‘Art education and the aesthetics of land use in the age of ecology’, Studies in Art Education, 39:3, pp. 244–61.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Girak, Sue, Lummis, Geoffrey and Johnson, Jackie (2019), ‘Creative reuse: The impact artmaking has on raising environmental consciousness’, International Journal of Education Through Art, 15:3, pp. 369–85.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gradle, Sally (2007), ‘Ecology of place: Art education in a relational world’, Studies in Art Education, 48:4, pp. 392–411.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Graham, Mark (2007), ‘Art, ecology and art education: Locating art education in a critical place-based pedagogy’, Studies in Art Education, 48:4, pp. 375–91.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gray, Tonia and Birrell, Carol (2015), ‘“Touched by the Earth”: A place-based outdoor learning programme incorporating the arts’, Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 15:4, pp. 330–49.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hawkins, Donald and Vinton, Dennis (1970), ‘Environmental education’, Art Education, 23:7, pp. 48–52.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hofsess, Brooke, Ulmer, Jasmine, Carlisle, Jennie and Caldwell, Shauna (2019), ‘Curating with ecologies of girlhood’, International Journal of Education Through Art, 15:3, pp. 357–68.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hufnagel, Elizabeth, Kelly, Gregory and Henderson, Joseph (2018), ‘How the environment is positioned in the Next Generation Science Standards: A critical discourse analysis’, Environmental Education Research, 24:5, pp. 731–53.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Illeris, Helene (2012), ‘Interrogations: Art, art education and environmental sustainability’, International Journal of Education Through Art, 8:3, pp. 221–37.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Inwood, Hilary (2008), ‘Mapping eco-art education’, Canadian Review of Art Education, 35, pp. 57–73.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kallio-Tavin, Mira (2020), ‘Art education beyond anthropocentricism: The question of nonhuman animals in contemporary art and its education’, Studies in Art Education, 61:4, pp. 298–311.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kopnina, Helen (2014), ‘Education for sustainable development (ESD): Exploring anthropocentric-ecocentric values in children through vignettes’, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, June, pp. 124–32.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kraehe, Amelia (2010), ‘Multicultural art education in an era of standardized testing: Changes in knowledge and skill for art teacher certification in Texas’, Studies in Art Education, 51:2, pp. 162–75.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Krippendorf, Klaus (2019), Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 4th ed., Washington, DC: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
30. La Porte, Angela, Speirs, Peg and Young, Bernard (2008), ‘Art curriculum influences: A national survey’, Studies in Art Education, 49:4, pp. 358–70.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lloro-Bidart, Teresa (2015), ‘A political ecology of education in/for the Anthropocene’, Environment and Society, 6:1, pp. 128–48, https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2015.060108.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Milbrandt, Melody, Shin, Ryan, Torres de Eça, Teresa and Hsieh, Kevin (2015), ‘Visual art curricula, art teacher goals, and instructional time: Findings from an international survey’, International Journal of Education Through Art, 11:1, pp. 137–56.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Miller, Wendy and Cardamone, Ashley (2021), ‘Educating through art, ecology, and ecojustice: A rain barrel project’, Art Education, 74:1, pp. 40–45.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Monitoring and Evaluating Climate Communication and Education Project (2022), Mapping the Landscape of K-12 Climate Change Education Policy in the United States, Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education, https://eepro.naaee.org/resource/mapping-landscape-k-12-climate-change-education-policy-united-states. Accessed 12 January 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
35. National Coalition for Core Arts Standards (NCCAS) (2014), National Core Arts Standards, https://www.nationalartsstandards.org/. Accessed 12 January 2024.
36. National Coalition for Core Arts Standards (2019), ‘The status of arts standards revision in the United States since 2014: A publication of the National Coalition for Core Arts Standards’, January, https://www.nationalartsstandards.org/sites/default/files/NCCAS-State-Reports-Since-2014.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2024.
37. Patton, Ryan and Buffington, Melanie (2016), ‘Keeping up with our students: The evolution of technology and standards in art education’, Arts Education Policy Review, 117:3, pp. 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Pavlou, Victoria and Vella, Raphael (2023), ‘Art, sustainability, and partnerships’, International Journal of Education Through Art, 19:1, pp. 3–10.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Saldaña, Johnny (2021), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 4th ed., Washington, DC: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sams, Jennifer and Sams, Doreen (2017), ‘Arts education as a vehicle for social change: An empirical study of eco arts in the K-12 classroom’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 33:2, pp. 61–80.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Schram, Asta (2014), ‘A mixed methods content analysis of the research literature in science education’, International Journal of Science Education, 36:15, pp. 2619–38.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Shaw, Ryan (2014), ‘An interview with Marcia McCaffrey about the core arts standards: Implications for arts teacher evaluation’, Arts Education Policy Review, 115:3, pp. 104–08.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Silver, Heather (2022), ‘Attuning to the natureculture of schooling in the Anthropocene: Ecologically-responsive art provocations with elementary students’, Ph.D. thesis, Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sund, Louise and Öhman, Johan (2014), ‘On the need to repoliticise environmental and sustainability education: Rethinking the postpolitical consensus’, Environmental Education Research, 20:5, pp. 639–59.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Teddlie, Charles and Tashakkori, Abbas (2006), ‘A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods’, Research in the Schools, 13:1, pp. 12–28.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Uitto, Anna and Saloranta, Seppo (2017), ‘Subject teachers as educators for sustainability: A survey study’, Education Sciences, 7:1, pp. 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Willerson, Amy (2019), ‘Bridging the gap: How the National Core Arts Standards forge the divide between the arts and assessment-based learning’, Arts Education Policy Review, 120:4, pp. 221–27.
    [Google Scholar]