Making art at the end of the world: (Un)learning in the Schoolhouse of Modernity

References

1. Anayatova, D., Basu, M., Darira, S., Freiband, A., Glanz, D., Halkiyo, A., Hovsepian, S., Jenik, A., Jiang, J., Komatsu, H., Kwarase, P., Law, L., Nielsen, A., Oneill, J., Palandjian, G., Pretti, E., Rappleye, J., Sanchez, B., Silova, I., Tsotniashvili, K. and contributing artists (2022), Turn It Around! An Education Guide to Climate Futures, Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University and Artists’ Literacies Institute, https://doi.org/10.14507/OGE-TiA.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bertling, Joy (2023), Art Education for a Sustainable Planet: Embracing Ecopedagogy in K–12 Classrooms, New York: Teachers College Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bowers, Chet (2001), ‘How language limits our understanding of environmental education’, Environmental Education Research, 7:2, pp. 141–51.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Burkhart, Brian (2019), Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land: A Trickster Methodology for Decolonizing Environmental Ethics and Indigenous Futures, East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chandler, David and Fuchs, Christian (2019), Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour and Politics in the Age of Big Data, London: University of Westminster Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Coletta, Michela (2023), ‘Critical border zones and anti-extractive thinking: Perspectives from the Andean world’, Radical History Review, 145, pp. 84–103.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Collier, John and Collier, Malcolm (1986), Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method, Albuquerque, NM: UNM Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Common Worlds Research Collective (2020), Learning to Become with the World: Education for Future Survival. UNESCO Futures of Education Initiative, Paris: UNESCO, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374923. Accessed 5 December 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Curley, Andrew and Smith, Sara (2023), ‘The cene scene: Who gets to theorize global time and how do we center indigenous and black futurities?’, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 7:1, pp. 1–23.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Eaton, Emily and Day, Nick (2020), ‘Petro-pedagogy: Fossil fuel interests and the obstruction of climate justice in public education’, Environmental Education Research, 26:4, pp. 457–73.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Erickson, Bruce (2020), ‘Anthropocene futures: Linking colonialism and environmentalism in an age of crisis’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38:1, pp. 111–28.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Escobar, Arturo (2018), Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Freiband, Andrew (2023), ‘Welcome to art as research/research as art: Proceedings of the Artists’ Literacies Institute’, Art as Research, Research as Art, 27 June, https://artistsliteracies.substack.com/p/coming-soon?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web. Accessed 6 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fry, Tony (2003), ‘Televisual designing: Defuturing and sustainment’, Design Philosophy Papers, 1:3, pp. 111–18.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Garoian, Charles R. (1998), ‘Art education and the aesthetics of land use in the age of ecology’, Studies in Art Education, 39:3, pp. 244–61.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Graham, Mark A. (2007), ‘Art, ecology, and art education: Locating art education in a critical place-based pedagogy’, Studies in Art Education, 48:4, pp. 375–91.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Haraway, Donna (2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. hooks, bell (1996), ‘Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom’, Journal of Leisure Research, 28:4, p. 316.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Inwood, Hillary (2010), ‘Shades of green: Growing environmentalism through art education’, Art Education, 63:6, pp. 33–38.
    [Google Scholar]
20. jagodzinski, jan (1987), ‘Toward an ecological aesthetic: Notes on a “green” frame of mind’, in D. Blandy and K. Congdon (eds), Art in a Democracy, New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 138–64.
    [Google Scholar]
21. jagodzinski, jan (2018), Interrogating the Anthropocene: Ecology, Aesthetics, Pedagogy, and the Future in Question, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jones, Alexander H. (2021), ‘What is an educational good? Theorising education as degrowth’, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 55:1, pp. 5–24.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Karsgaard, Carrie, MacDonald, Maggie and Hockenhull, Michael (2021), ‘Rename and resist settler colonialism: Land acknowledgments and Twitter’s toponymic politics’, First Monday, 26:2, https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i2.11454.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Komatsu, Hikaru, Rappleye, Jeremy and Silova, Iveta (2021), ‘Student-centered learning and sustainability: Solution or problem?’, Comparative Education Review, 65:1, pp. 6–33.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Krishnamurti, Jiddu ([1953] 1981), Education and the Significance of Life, New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark (2008), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Li, Christine and Monroe, Martha C. (2018), ‘Development and validation of the climate change hope scale for high school students’, Environment and Behavior, 50:4, pp. 454–79.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Loveless, Natalie (2019), How to Make Art at the End of the World: A Manifesto for Research-Creation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Marker, Michael (2018), ‘There is no place of nature; there is only the nature of place: Animate landscapes as methodology for inquiry in the Coast Salish territory’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31:6, pp. 453–64.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mbembe, Achille (2019), Necropolitics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mbembe, Achille and Shread, Carolyn (2021), ‘The universal right to breathe’, Critical Inquiry, 47:2, pp. S58–S62.
    [Google Scholar]
32. O’Donnell, Aislinn (2016), ‘Experimental philosophy and experimental pedagogy: A single vision’, in A. Hickey-Moody and T. Page (eds), Arts, Pedagogy and Cultural Resistance: New Materialisms, London: Rowman & Littlefield International, pp. 21–39.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Roane, J. T. (2023), ‘Worldmaking, power, and ecologies in the “Negrocene”’, American Quarterly, 75:1, pp. 163–76.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Silova, Iveta (2021), ‘Facing the anthropocene: Comparative education as sympoiesis’, Comparative Education Review, 65:4, pp. 587–616.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Simpson, Leanne B. and Klein, Naomi (2017), ‘Dancing the world into being: A conversation with Idle No More’s Simpson’, Tabula Rasa, 26, pp. 51–70.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Singh, Julietta (2018), Unthinking Mastery: Dehumanism and Decolonial Entanglements, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Somerville, Margaret, McGavock, Tessa and Stephenson, Keiren (2020), ‘Becoming bird: Creative pedagogies for future-making education?’, in P. Burnard and L. Colucci-Gray (eds), Why Science and Art Creativities Matter: (Re-)Configuring STEAM for Future-Making Education, Leiden: Brill – Sense, pp. 35–51.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Stein, Sharon, Andreotti, Vanessa, Suša, Rene, Amsler, Sarah, Hunt, Dallas, Ahenakew, Cash, Jimmy, Elwood, Cajkova, Tereza, Valley, Will, Cardoso, Camilla, Siwek, Dino, Pitaguary, Benicio, D’Emilia, Dani, Pataxó, Ubiracy, Calhoun, Bill and Okano, Haruko (2020), ‘Gesturing towards decolonial futures: Reflections on our learnings thus far’, Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 4:1, pp. 43–65.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Stein, Sharon, Hunt, Dallas, Suša, Rene and de Oliveira Andreotti, Vanessa (2017), ‘The educational challenge of unraveling the fantasies of ontological security’, Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 11:2, pp. 69–79.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Straumann, Ralph K. and Graham, Mark (2016), ‘Who isn’t online? Mapping the “Archipelago of Disconnection”’, Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3:1, pp. 96–98.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Taylor, Carol A. (2020), ‘Knowledge matters: Five propositions concerning the reconceptualisation of knowledge in feminist new materialist, posthumanist and postqualitative approaches’, in K. Murris (ed.), Navigating the Postqualitative, New Materialist and Critical Posthumanist Terrain Across Disciplines, London: Routledge, pp. 22–42.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tlostanova, Madina (2017), ‘On decolonizing design’, Design Philosophy Papers, 15:1, pp. 51–61.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Tlostanova, Madina and Mignolo, Walter (2012), Learning to Unlearn: Decolonial Reflections from Eurasia and the Americas, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Tsing, Anna (2015), The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Verlie, Blanche (2019), ‘Bearing worlds: Learning to live-with climate change’, Environmental Education Research, 25:5, pp. 751–66, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1637823.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Weintraub, Linda (2012), To Life! Eco Art in Pursuit of a Sustainable Planet, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Wu, Jinting, Eaton, Paul William, Robinson-Morris, David W., Wallace, Maria F. G. and Han, Shaofei (2018), ‘Perturbing possibilities in the postqualitative turn: Lessons from Taoism (道) and Ubuntu’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31:6, pp. 504–19.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Xausa, Chiara (2020), ‘Decolonizing the anthropocene: “Slow violence” and indigenous resistance in Cherie Dimaline’s The Marrow Thieves’, Il Tolomeo, 1, pp. 87–99.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Yusoff, Kathryn (2018), A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Zuboff, Shoshana (2020), The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, New York: Hachette Book Group.
    [Google Scholar]