(Un)scripted tales of intersectional silences through comic zines at middle school

References

1. Aldama, Frederick Luis (ed.) (2010), Multicultural Comics: From Zap to Blue Beetle, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, https://doi.org/10.7560/722811.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahmed, Sara (2013), The Cultural Politics of Emotion, New York: Taylor and Francis, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700372.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ariskuwu, Obi (n.d.), ‘Comics’, https://www.obiaris.com/comics. Accessed 1 October 2024.
4. Barratt Hacking, Elisabeth, Blackmore, Chloe, Bullock, Kate, Bunnell, Tristan, Donnelly, Michael and Martin, Susan (2018), ‘International mindedness in practice: The evidence from international baccalaureate schools’, Journal of Research in International Education, 17:1, pp. 3–16, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240918764722.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bauer, Greta and Scheim, Ayden (2019), ‘Advancing quantitative intersectionality research methods: Intracategorical and intercategorical approaches to shared and differential constructs’, Social Science & Medicine, 226, pp. 260–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.018.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Belting, Hanz (2007), Antropología de la imagen, Buenos Aires: Editorial Katz.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Benhabib, Seyla (2002), The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bertelsen, Lone and Murphie, Andrew (2010), ‘An ethics of everyday infinities and powers: Félix Guattari on affect and the refrain’, in M. Gregg and G. J. Seigworth (eds), The Affect Theory Reader, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 128–40.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bozalek, Vivienne and Zembylas, Michalinos (2017), ‘Diffraction or reflection? Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30:2, pp. 111–27, https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1201166.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Braun, Virginia and Clarke, Victoria (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77–101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Butler, Judith (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Carbado, Devon K., Crenshaw, Kimberlé W., Mays, Vicki M. and Tomlinson, Barbara (2013), ‘Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory’, Social Text, 31:4, pp. 234–58, https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2779. Accessed 10 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Carspecken, Philip (1996), Critical Ethnography in Educational Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Case, Kevin (ed.) (2017), Intersectional Pedagogy: Complicating Identity and Social Justice, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Case, Kevin and Lewis, Michelle (2017), ‘Teaching intersectional psychology in racially diverse settings’, in K. Case (ed.), Intersectional Pedagogy: Complicating Identity and Social Justice, New York: Routledge, pp. 129–49.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cho, Sumi, Crenshaw, Kimberlé and McCall, Leslie (2013), ‘Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis’, SIGNS, 38:4, pp. 785–810, https://doi.org/10.1086/669608.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Crenshaw, Kimberlé (1989), ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989:1, pp. 139–67, http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8. Accessed 2 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Crenshaw, Kimberlé (1991), ‘Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color’, Stanford Law Review, 43:6, pp. 1241–99.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Crenshaw, Kimberlé (2017), On Intersectionality: Essential Writings, New York: Faculty Books, https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/books/255. Accessed 1 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
20. DeHart, Jennifer D. and Shadrick, Sarah (2023), ‘Intersectional identity representation and approaches in comics’, in J. DeHart (ed.), Exploring Comics and Graphic Novels in the Classroom, Hershey: IGI Global, pp. 190–201, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4313-2.ch010.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Delgado, Richard and Stefancic, Jean (2023), Critical Race Theory, 4th ed., New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Denzin, Norman K. (2017), Critical Ethnography: Understanding and Transforming Social Reality, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Desai, Dipti (2020), ‘Educating for social change through art: A personal reckoning’, Studies in Art Education, 61:1, pp. 10–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2019.1699366.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Desai, Dipti, Heras, Ana Ines, Anderson, Gary and Spreen, Carol Anne (2023), Creating Third Spaces of Learning for Post-Capitalism: Lessons from Educators, Artists, and Activists, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Deutch, Bill (2012), How to Make a Man Out of Tin Foil, n.p.: Bill Deutch.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Duncombe, Stephen (1997), Notes from Underground: Zines and the Politics of Alternative Culture, New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Education Act (2010), ‘Act relating to primary and secondary education’, Norwegian Government, 15 September, https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/education-act/id213315/. Accessed 1 October 2024.
28. Foley, Douglas and Valenzuela, Angela (2005), ‘Critical ethnography: The politics of collaboration’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 217–34.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Foucault, Michel (2017), ‘What is an author?’, in J. Rivkin and M. Ryan (eds), Literary Theory: An Anthology, 3rd ed., Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 216–29.
    [Google Scholar]
30. General Data Protection Regulation (n.d.), GDPR.eu, https://gdpr-info.eu. Accessed 24 April 2025.
31. Gross, Chris and Goldan, Lauren (2023), ‘Modelling intersectionality within quantitative research’, Sozialpolitik, 1:3 pp. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.18753/2297-8224-4025.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Guillory, Nia A. (2021), ‘Remembering we were never meant to survive …: Honoring Audre Lorde and the promise of Black women’s survival’, Curriculum Inquiry, 51:3, pp. 293–306, https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2021.1941798.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Haraway, Donna (1988), ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14:3, pp. 575–99, https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Haseman, Brad (2006), ‘A manifesto for performative research’, Media International Australia, 118:1, pp. 98–106, https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0611800113.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hellgren, Zenia and Zapata-Barrero, Ricard (2022), ‘Discrimination meets interculturalism in theory, policy and practice’, International Migration, 63:1, pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13048.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Hill Collins, Patricia (2000), ‘Gender, black feminism, and black political economy’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568:1, pp. 41–53, https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620056800105.
    [Google Scholar]
37. hooks, bell (1991), ‘Theory as liberatory practice’, The Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 4:1, pp. 1–12, https://openyls.law.yale.edu/handle/20.500.13051/7151?show=full. Accessed 2 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
38. hooks, bell (1994), Engaged Pedagogy: Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Irwin, Rita and Springgay, Stephanie (2008), A/r/tography as Practice-Based Research: Being with A/r/tography, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Irwin, Rita L., Lee, Nicole Y. S., Baldus, Angela I., Barney, Daniel T., Ursino, Joanne M. and Eskandary, Zohreh V. (2024a), Pedagogical Propositions: Playful Walking with A/R/Tography, Viseu: InSEA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Irwin, Rita L., Lasczik, Alexandra, Sinner, Anita and Triggs, Valerie (eds) (2024b), A/r/tography: Essential Readings and Conversations, Bristol: Intellect Books.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Kovach, M. (2009), ‘Situating self, culture, and purpose in indigenous inquiry’, in M. Kovach (ed.), Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations and Contexts, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 109–20.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Ladson-Billings, Gloria (1998), ‘Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11:1, pp. 7–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236863.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Licona, Adela C. (2012), Zines in Third Space: Radical Cooperation and Borderlands Rhetorics, New York: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Lorde, Audre (1984), ‘The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house’, in Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches, Berkeley, CA: The Crossing Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Madden, Matt (2012), ‘A history of American comic books in six panels’, 8 August, https://mattmadden.com/2012/08/08/a-history-of-american-comic-books-in-six-panels/. Accessed 15 April 2024.
47. Madison, D. Soyini (2012), Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Martin, Jennifer (2023), ‘Comics and community: Exploring the relationship between society, education, and citizenship’, in J. DeHart (ed.), Exploring Comics and Graphic Novels in the Classroom, Hershey: IGI Global, pp. 203–28, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4313-2.ch011.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Massumi, Brian and Goggin, Greg (2005), ‘The autonomy of affect’, in Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 23–45.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Naples, Nancy (2017), ‘Pedagogical practice and teaching intersectionality intersectionally’, in K. Case (ed.), Intersectional Pedagogy: Complicating Identity and Social Justice, pp. 110–60, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Piepmeier, Alison (2009), Girl Zines: Making Media, Doing Feminism, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Reddy, Vidhu and Butler, Judith (2004), ‘Troubling genders, subverting identities: Interview with Judith Butler’, Agenda, 18:62, pp. 115–23, https://www.jstor.org/stable/4066688. Accessed 24 April 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Rios, Desdamona, Bowling, Matthew J. and Harris, Jacquelyn (2017), ‘Decentering student “uniqueness” in lessons about intersectionality’, in K. Case (ed.), Intersectional Pedagogy: Complicating Identity and Social Justice, New York: Routledge, pp. 194–213.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Rivera, David (2017), ‘Revealing hidden intersections of gender identity, sexual orientation, race, and ethnicity: Teaching about multiple oppressed identities’, in K. Case (ed.), Intersectional Pedagogy: Complicating Identity and Social Justice, New York: Routledge, pp. 173–93.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Rolling, Joseph (2011), Arts-Based Research: A Critical Discourse on Methodology, New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Rose, Gillian (2016), Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials, 4th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Satrapi, Marjane (2006), Persepolis, London: Jonathan Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Scheim, Andrea (2014), ‘Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: Challenges and the potential to advance health equity’, Social Science & Medicine, 110:10, pp. 10–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.022.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Scherr, Rachel (2013), ‘Graphic novels and comics in the classroom’, in R. Weiner and C. Syma (eds), Graphic Novels and Comics in the Classroom, Jefferson, NC: McFarland, pp. 134–44.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Smith, Hazel and Dean, Roger (2009), ‘Introduction: Practice-led research, research-led practice – Towards the iterative cyclic web’, in Practice-Led Research, Research-Led Practice in the Creative Arts, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–38.
    [Google Scholar]
61. St. Pierre, Elizabeth A. (2014), ‘Ethics in entanglement’, Knowledge Cultures, 1:5, pp. 141–55.
    [Google Scholar]
62. St. Pierre, Elizabeth A. (2018), ‘Post-qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the new’, Qualitative Inquiry, 24:3, pp. 185–94.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Thaller, Sarah (2023), ‘Embracing the indefinable: Expanding comic composition in the secondary English classroom’, in J. DeHart (ed.), Exploring Comics and Graphic Novels in the Classroom, Hershey: IGI Global, pp. 25–45, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4313-2.ch002.
    [Google Scholar]
64. The International Baccalaureate Middle Years Arts Program (2024), ‘Arts’, 6 March, https://www.ibo.org/programmes/middle-years-programme/curriculum/arts/. Accessed 5 August 2024.
65. Tumanyam, Marian and Huuki, Tuija (2020), ‘Arts in working with youth on sensitive topics: A qualitative systematic review’, International Journal of Education Through Art, 16:3, pp. 381–97, https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00040_1.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Utdanings direktorate (n.d.), ‘Art and crafts KHV01-02: Competence aims and assessment’, https://www.udir.no/lk20/khv01-02/kompetansemaal-og-vurdering/kv159?lang=eng. Accessed 20 September 2024.
67. UN Women (2023), ‘UN women’s approach to disability inclusion and intersectionality’, https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2023/11/brief-un-womens-approach-to-disability-inclusion-and-intersectionality. Accessed 12 March 2024.
68. Wadud, Amina (2020), ‘Intersectionality and Islam: Gender, ethnicity, and religious identity’, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 36:2, pp. 15–25.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Ziesler, Amy (2016), ‘It’s a boy’s life’, Public Affairs, n.p.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Bauer, Greta R. (2014), ‘Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: Challenges and the potential to advance health equity’, Social Science & Medicine, 110, pp. 10–17, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953614001919?via%3Dihub. Accessed 20 December 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
71. International Baccalaureate (2022), ‘Our mission’, https://www.ibo.org/about-the-ib/mission/. Accessed 5 August 2024.
72. Irwin, Rita I. (2013), ‘Becoming a/r/tography’, Studies in Art Education, 54:3, pp. 198–215, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2013.11518894.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Østern, Tone P., Jusslin, Sofia, Nødtvedt Knudsen, Kristian, Maapalo, Pauliina and Bjørkøy, Ingrid (2021), ‘A performative paradigm for post-qualitative inquiry’, Qualitative Research, 21:2, pp. 2–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211027444.
    [Google Scholar]