Paint me an essay: Investigating the potential for arts-based approaches to enhance critical studies

References

1. Barone, T. and Eisner, E. W. (2011), Arts Based Research, London: Sage Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bassey, M. (1999), Case Study Research in Educational Settings, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Biggs, J. B. (1996), ‘Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment’, Higher Education, 32:3, pp. 347–64, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biggs, J. B. and Tang, C. (2011), Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 4th ed., Berkshire: Open University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blackler, F. (1995), ‘Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation’, Organization Studies, 16:6, pp. 1021–46, https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600605.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Borgdorff, H. (2012), The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia, Leiden: Leiden University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77–101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Candy, L. and Edmonds, E. (2010), ‘The role of the artefact and frameworks for practice-based research’, in M. Biggs and H. Karlsson (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, London: Routledge, pp. 120–37.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2018), Research Methods in Education, 8th ed., London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cresswell, J. W. (2013), ‘What is mixed methods research?’, YouTube, 19 February, https://bit.ly/3uGk7sh. Accessed 8 September 2024.
11. De Jesus, O. N. (2016), ‘Integrating the arts to facilitate second language learning’, Research and Education Source, 5, pp. 20–24.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dressman, M. (2019), ‘Multimodality and language learning’, in M. Dressman and R. W. Sadler (eds), The Handbook of Informal Language Learning, Newark: Wiley, pp. 39–55.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Duram, L. A. (2012), ‘Pragmatic study’, in N. J. Salkind (ed.), Encyclopedia of Research Design, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 1073–75, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n326.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Eisner, E. W. (2002), The Arts and the Creation of Mind, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Entwistle, N. and Ramsden, P. ([1983] 2015), Understanding Student Learning, Abingdon: Routledge Revivals and Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gage, N. L. (1989), ‘The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “Historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989’, Educational Researcher, 18:7, pp. 4–10, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018007004.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago, IL: Aldane.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Guichon, N. and Cohen, C. (2016), ‘Multimodality and CALL’, in F. Farr and L. Murray (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology, London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, pp. 660–76.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Harasym, J. A, Gross, D. P, MacLeod, A. A. N. and Phelan, S. K. (2024), ‘“This Is a Look into My Life”: Enhancing qualitative inquiry into communication through arts-based research methods’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241232603.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Helmick, L. (2022), ‘Expressive portraiture as research: Exploration, ideation and discovery’, International Journal of Education Through Art, 18:3, pp. 395–410, https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00108_1.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hunter, L. and Frawley, E. (2022), ‘Engaging students using an arts-based pedagogy: Teaching and learning sociological theory through film, art, and music’, Teaching Sociology, 51:1, pp. 13–25, https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x221096657.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice (2022), ‘Aims and scope’, Intellect, https://www.intellectbooks.com/journal-of-writing-in-creative-practice. Accessed 8 September 2024.
23. Kehm, B. M., Freeman, R. P. J. and Locke, W. (2018), ‘Growth and diversification of doctoral education in the United Kingdom’, in J. C. Shin, B. M. Kehm and G. A. Jones (eds), Doctoral Education for the Knowledge of Society: Convergence or Divergence in National Approaches?, Cham: Springer, pp. 105–21.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Knowles, J. G. and Cole, A. L. (2008), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research, London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kolb, D. A. (1984), Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2001), Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication, London: Arnold Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
27. LaJevic, L. (2013), ‘Arts integration: What is really happening in the elementary classroom?’, Journal for Learning through the Arts, 9:1, pp. 1–28, https://doi.org/10.21977/d99112615.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Leinhardt, G., McCarthy Young, K. and Merriman, J. (1995), ‘Integrating professional knowledge: The theory of practice and the practice of theory’, Learning and Instruction, 5:4, pp. 401–08, https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(95)00025-9.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Marton, F. and Säljö, R. (1976), ‘On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46:1, pp. 4–11, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x.
    [Google Scholar]
31. McNiff, J. (2002), Action Research: Principles and Practice, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. McNiff, J. (2022), ‘Action research for professional development’, Jean McNiff Official Website, https://bit.ly/3t3UQYu. Accessed 8 September 2024.
33. McNiff, S. (2007), ‘Art-based research’, in J. G. Knowles and A. L. Cole (eds), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 29–40.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Melles, G. and Lockheart, J. (2012), ‘Writing purposefully in art and design: Responding to converging and diverging new academic literacies’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11:4, pp. 346–62, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022211432116.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Merriam, S. B. (1998), Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Moreira, M., Murphy, E. and McAra-McWilliam, I. (2016), ‘The emergence of an amplified mindset of design: Implications for postgraduate design education’, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 35:3, pp. 356–68, https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12118.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Orland-Barak, L. and Yinon, H. (2007), ‘When theory meets practice: What student teachers learn from guided reflection on their own classroom discourse’, Teaching and Teacher Education, 23:6, pp. 957–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.005.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Orr, S. and Shreeve, A. (2018), Art and Design Pedagogy in Higher Education: Knowledge, Values and Ambiguity in the Creative Curriculum, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Pearse, H. (1992), ‘Beyond paradigms: Art education theory and practice in a postparadigmatic world’, Studies in Art Education, 33:4, pp. 244–52, https://doi.org/10.2307/1320669.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Piaget, J. (1957), Construction of Reality in the Child, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Polanyi, M. ([1966] 2009), The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Prentice, R. (2000), ‘The place of practical knowledge in research in art and design education’, Teaching in Higher Education, 5:4, pp. 521–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/713699178.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Radović, S, Firssova, O, Hummel, H. G. K. and Vermeulen, M. (2020), ‘Strengthening the ties between theory and practice in higher education: An investigation into different levels of authenticity and processes of re- and de-contextualisation’, Studies in Higher Education, 46:12, pp. 2710–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1767053.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Read, H. ([1943] 1970), Education through Art, London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Resch, K., Schrittesser, I. and Knapp, M. (2022), ‘Overcoming the theory-practice divide in teacher education with the “Partner School Programme”: A conceptual mapping’, European Journal of Teacher Education, 47:3, pp. 564–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2022.2058928.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Rintoul, J. (2014), ‘Theory and (in) practice: The problem of integration in art and design education’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 33:3, pp. 345–54, https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12064.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Ryle, G. ([1949] 2009), The Concept of Mind: 60th Anniversary Edition, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Staikidis, K. (2024), ‘Breathing theory into practice: Art education in these times’, Studies in Art Education, 65:3, pp. 277–83, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2024.2385278.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Taylor, S. and Wisker, G. (2023), ‘The changing landscape of doctoral education in the UK’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60:5, pp. 759–74, https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2237943.
    [Google Scholar]
50. The Glasgow School of Art (2022), ‘Art writing’, https://bit.ly/3gFt3dx. Accessed 8 September 2024.
51. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Writing-PAD (2022), ‘The mission’, 19 March, http://bit.ly/45adAaF. Accessed 8 September 2024.
53. Yazan, B. (2015), ‘Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake’, The Qualitative Report, 20:2, pp. 134–52, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102.
    [Google Scholar]