Skip to content
1981
Volume 21, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1743-5234
  • E-ISSN: 2040-090X

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in pre-service art teacher education remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by investigating Japanese pre-service art education students’ ( = 14) perspectives on text-to-image generative AI. Conducted through a hands-on workshop, the study explored both opportunities and challenges of AI integration within K–12 art education. Participants expressed concerns about AI’s potential to diminish creativity, artistic development and critical thinking through over-reliance. Conversely, they recognized AI’s affordances in enhancing creative potential, streamlining tasks and reshaping teacher identities through co-creation. The findings reflect a nuanced blend of optimism and scepticism, underscoring the complex and evolving role of AI in disrupting art education practice.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Hanyang University (Award HY-201000000000888)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (Award 20KK0045)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eta_00212_1
2025-11-29
2026-04-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abe, I., Ishii, K. and Ishizuka, S. (2024), ‘児童の課題発見を促すAIを用いた学習プログラムの開発に関する実践的研究―小学校体育科における投の運動を題材にしてー’ (‘A practical study on developing a learning program using AI to promote problem discovery in children: Focusing on throwing movements in elementary school physical education’), Journal of Society of Clinical Education for Individual School Subjects, 23:2, pp. 112, https://doi.org/10.60392/rinkyokyo.23.2_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Audry, S. (2021), Art in the Age of Machine Learning, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Caramiaux, B. and Fdili Alaoui, S. (2022), ‘“Explorers of unknown planets”: Practices and politics of artificial intelligence in visual arts’, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6:CSCW2, pp. 124, https://doi.org/10.1145/3555578.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R. and Sawchuk, P. (2011), Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Sociomaterial, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fiebrink, R. (2019), ‘Machine learning education for artists, musicians, and other creative practitioners’, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 19:4, pp. 132, https://doi.org/10.1145/3294008.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gentile, M., Città, G., Perna, S. and Allegra, M. (2023), ‘Do we still need teachers? Navigating the paradigm shift of the teacher’s role in the AI era’, Frontiers in Education, 8, pp. 114, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1161777.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Graham, M. A. and Goetz Zwirn, S. (2010), ‘How being a teaching artist can influence K-12 art education’, Studies in Art Education, 51:3, pp. 21932, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2010.11518804.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gwern (2020), ‘GPT-3 creative fiction’, https://www.Gwern.Net/GPT-3. Accessed 11 March 2024.
  10. Hammer, D. and Berland, L. K. (2014), ‘Confusing claims for data: A critique of common practices for presenting qualitative research on learning’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23:1, pp. 3746, https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.802652.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hinoi, K. and Yamazaki, T. (2024), ‘知的障害特別支援学校中学部における生成AIの理解と学びへの活用に関する教育実践’ (‘Educational practice on understanding and utilizing generative AI in special schools for junior high school students with intellectual disabilities’), Japan Journal of Educational Technology, 48, suppl., pp. 6164, https://doi.org/10.60392/rinkyokyo.23.2_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hintz, A., Dencik, L. and Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Digital Citizenship in a Datafied Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Holmes, W., Bialik, M. and Fadel, C. (2019), Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning, Boston, MA: The Center for Curriculum Redesign.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hopcan, S., Türkmen, G. and Polat, E. (2024), ‘Exploring the artificial intelligence anxiety and machine learning attitudes of teacher candidates’, Education and Information Technologies, 29:6, pp. 7281301, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12086-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Imai, S. (2023), 生成 AI で世界はこう変わる (How Generative AI will Change the World) (trans. S. Imai), SB 新書 [SB Creative], Tokyo: Diamond, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (2024), Ethical Guidelines for the Proper Conduct of Research, Tokyo: JSPS.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kang, N. H. (2019), ‘A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea’, Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5:1, pp. 122, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Keune, A. and Peppler, K. (2019), ‘Materials-to-develop-with: The making of a makerspace’, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50:1, pp. 28093, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12702.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, U., Han, A., Lee, J., Lee, E., Kim, J., Kim, H. and Lim, C. (2024), ‘Prompt aloud! Incorporating image-generative AI into STEAM class with learning analytics using prompt data’, Education and Information Technologies, 29:8, pp. 9575605, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12150-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, V. and Chilton, L. B. (2022), ‘Design guidelines for prompt engineering text-to-image generative models’, in S. Barbosa, C. Lampe, C. Appert, D. Shamma, S. Drucker, J. Williamson and K. Yatani (eds), CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA, 29 April–5 May, New York: ACM, pp. 123.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lupton, D. and Watson, A. (2022), ‘Creations for speculating about digitized automation: Bringing creative writing prompts and vital materialism into the sociology of futures’, Qualitative Inquiry, 28:7, pp. 75466, https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221097049.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mehto, V., Kangas, K. and Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2020), ‘Sociomateriality of collaboration within a small team in secondary school maker-centered learning project’, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100209.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nakagawa, Y. (2023), ‘画像生成AIによる作画表現の実用性と教育への応用、その正当性と法的妥当性について’ (‘The practicality of drawing expression using generative AI and its application to education: Its justification and legal validity’), Bulletin of Faculty of Arts, Tokyo Polytechnic University, 29, pp. 2329, https://kougei.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_view_main_item_detail&item_id=2181&item_no=1&page_id=13&block_id=21. Accessed 16 September 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Oppenlaender, J. (2022), ‘The creativity of text-based generative art’, ArXiv, https://ai-data-base.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/The-Creativity-of-Text-based-Generative-Art.pdf. Accessed 16 September 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rezwana, J. and Maher, M. L. (2022), ‘Designing creative AI partners with COFI: A framework for modeling interaction in human-AI co-creative systems’, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30:5, pp. 128, https://doi.org/10.1145/3519026.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Taguchi, H. L. (2011), ‘Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach’, Global Studies of Childhood, 1:1, pp. 3650, https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.36.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tanaka, H. (2024), ‘画像生成AIを用いた図画工作科教育の授業開発に関する試行的研究―創造的鑑賞のための小単元におけるAdobe Fireflyの活用を通して―’ (‘Preliminary study on the development of art education lessons using image generation AI: Through the utilization of adobe firefly in the learning units for creative appreciation’), Academic Studies and Scientific Research: Cultural Science and Social Science, Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, 72, pp. 16989, https://waseda.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2001201/file_preview/GakujutsuKenkyu_Jinbun_72_12.pdf?allow_aggs=True. Accessed 16 September 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tedre, M., Toivonen, T., Kahila, J., Vartiainen, H., Valtonen, T., Jormanainen, I. and Pears, A. (2021), ‘Teaching machine learning in K-12 classroom: Pedagogical and technological trajectories for artificial intelligence education’, IEEE Access, 9, pp. 110558572, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3097962.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. UNESCO (2023), Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693. Accessed 16 September 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Vartiainen, H. and Tedre, M. (2023), ‘Using artificial intelligence in craft education: Crafting with text-to-image generative models’, Digital Creativity, 34:1, pp. 121, https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2023.2174557.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vartiainen, H., Tedre, M. and Jormanainen, I. (2023), ‘Co-creating digital art with generative AI in K-9 education: Socio-material insights’, International Journal of Education Through Art, 19:3, pp. 40523, https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00143_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/eta_00212_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/eta_00212_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test