The modern imagination of the governess: Reshaping Sanditon with post-feminism

References

1. Austen, Jane (1995), Pride and Prejudice, Ontario: Broadview Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Austen, Jane (2008), Northanger Abbey, Lady Susan, The Watsons, Sanditon, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Austen, Jane (2012), Emma, n.p.: Public Domain Book.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Banet-Weiser, Sarah (2018), Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Budgeon, Shelley (2011), ‘The contradictions of successful femininity: Third-wave feminism, postfeminism and “new” femininities’, in R. Gill and C. Scharff (eds), New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 279–92.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burdan, Judith (1994), ‘Girls must be seen and heard: Domestic surveillance in Sarah fielding’s the governess’, Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 19:1, pp. 8–14.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Burstyn, Joan N. (2016), Victorian Education and the Ideal of Womanhood, London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cobb, Shelley (2014), Adaptation, Authorship, and Contemporary Women Filmmakers, New York: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Davies, Andrew (2020), in-person interview with K. Jones, London, 3 May.
10. Evans-Winters, Venus E. and Esposito, Jenifer (2010), ‘Other people’s daughters: Critical race feminism and Black girls’ education’, Educational Foundations, 24:1–2, pp. 11–24.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gilbert, Nora (2015), ‘A servitude of one’s own: Isolation, authorship, and the nineteenth-century British governess’, Nineteenth-Century Literature, 69:4, pp. 455–80.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gill, Rosalind (2007), ‘Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10:2, pp. 147–66.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gill, Rosalind (2019), ‘Post-postfeminism?: New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times’, in J. Keller, J. Littler and A. Winch (eds), An Intergenerational Feminist Media Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 54–74.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hallemann, Caroline (2020), ‘Andrew Davies says he feels “a bit guilty” about Sanditon’s shocking ending’, Town & Country, online first, https://www.townandcountrymag.com/leisure/arts-and-culture/a31079438/sanditon-shocking-ending-andrew-davies-season-2-interview/. Accessed 24 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Harvey, David (2005), Spaces of Neoliberalization: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development, vol. 8, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Horn, Pamela (1989), ‘The Victorian governess’, History of Education, 18:4, pp. 333–44.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Horwitz, Barbara (1994), ‘Women’s education during the Regency: Jane Austen’s quiet rebellion’, Persuasions: Journal of the Jane Austen Society of North America, 16, pp. 135–46.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jiang, Lin and Li, Zeng (2017), ‘A study of the 19^th century governess novel in England’, Foreign History Studies, 3, pp. 102–07.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jolles, Marjorie (2012), ‘Going rogue: Postfeminism and the privilege of breaking rules’, Feminist Formations, 24:3, pp. 43–61.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Locke, John (1970), Some Thoughts Concerning Education, 1693, Leeds: Scolar Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. López, Gemma (2005), ‘Inf(l)ecting Pride and Prejudice: Dialogism, intertextuality, and adaptation’, in M. Aragay (ed.), Motion: Adaptation, Intertextuality, Authorship, Leiden: Rodopi, pp. 201–22.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mangan, James. A. (1989), ‘The social construction of Victorian femininity: Emancipation, education and exercise’, The International Journal of the History of Sport, 6:1, pp. 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
23. McRobbie, Angela (2007), ‘Post feminism and popular culture: Bridget Jones and the new gender regime’, in D. Negra and Y. Tasker (eds), Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 27–39.
    [Google Scholar]
24. McRobbie, Angela (2008), The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change, London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Negra, Diana (2009), What a Girl Wants?: Fantasizing the Reclamation of Self in Postfeminism, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Peterson, M. Jeanne (2013), ‘The Victorian governess: Status incongruence in family and society’, in M. Vicinus (ed.), Suffer and Be Still (Routledge Revivals), London: Routledge, pp. 3–19.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Poovey, Mary (2009), Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Porter, Anges (1998), A Governess in the Age of Jane Austen: The Journals and Letters of Agnes Porter, London: A&C Black.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sandberg, Sheryl (2014), Lean In, New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sutherland, Kathryn (2005), Jane Austen’s Textual Lives: From Aeschylus to Bollywood, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Tasker, Yvonne and Negra, Diane (2007), ‘Introduction: Feminist politics and postfeminist culture’, in Y. Tasker and D. Negra (eds), Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Vicinus, Martha (2013), Suffer and Be Still (Routledge Revivals): Women in the Victorian Age, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Yoong, Melissa (2020), Professional Discourses, Gender and Identity in Women’s Media, Berlin: Springer Nature.
    [Google Scholar]