When elephants fight back: Animal standpoint reading of Nirmal Ghosh’s Novella River Storm

References

1. Aaltola, E. (2012), Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture, New York: Springer Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Agamben, G. (2004), The Open: Man and Animal, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ani, J. R. (2023), ‘Call of the wild’, The Hindu, 1 January, https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/open-page/call-of-the-wild/article66302804.ece. Accessed 1 June 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arcari, P. (2023), ‘Slow violence against animals: Unseen spectacles in racing and at zoos’, Geoforum, 144:1, pp. 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Armstrong, P. and Simmons, L. (eds) (2007), Knowing Animals, Boston, MA: Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baker, T. C. (2019), Writing Animals: Language, Suffering, and Animality in Twenty-First-Century Fiction, Cham: Springer Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Balasubramanian, M., Baskaran, N., Swaminathan, S. and Desai, A. A. (1995), ‘Crop raiding by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in the Nilgiri Biosphere reserve, South India’, in J. C. Daniel and H. S. Datye (eds), A Week with Elephants, Proceedings of the International Seminar on the Conservation of Asian Elephant, Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern India, June 1993, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 350–67.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ball, R., Jacobson, S. L., Rudolph, M. S., Trapani, M. and Plotnik, J. M. (2022), ‘Acknowledging the relevance of elephant sensory perception to human–elephant conflict mitigation’, Animals, 12:8, pp. 1–17.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bates, L. A., Sayialel, K. N., Njiraini, N. W., Moss, C. J., Poole, J. H. and Byrne, R. W. (2007), ‘Elephants classify human ethnic groups by odor and garment color’, Current Biology, 17:22, pp. 1938–42.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Born Free (2023), ‘Human-wildlife conflict is killing animals: Why action and coexistence are key’, 1 March, https://www.bornfree.org.uk/news/human-wildlife-conflict-is-killing-animals/. Accessed 26 November 2023.
11. Büscher, B. and Fletcher, R. (2016), ‘Destructive creation: Capital accumulation and the structural violence of tourism’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25:5, pp. 651–67.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Butler, J. (2004), Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Çetin, G. T. (2020), ‘An animal-standpoint reading of farewell Gul’sary by Chingiz Aitmatov’, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 30:1, pp. 29–39.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chrulew, M. (2011), ‘Managing love and death at the zoo: The biopolitics of endangered species preservation’, Australian Humanities Review, 50:1, pp. 137–57.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chrulew, M. and Wadiwel, D. J. (eds) (2017), Foucault and Animals, Boston, MA: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cole, M. (2011), ‘From “animal machines” to “happy meat?” Foucault’s ideas of disciplinary and pastoral power applied to “animal-centred” welfare discourse’, Animals, 1:1, pp. 83–101.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Collard, R. C. (2012), ‘Cougar-human entanglements and the biopolitical un/making of safe space’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30:1, pp. 23–42.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Colling, S. (2018), ‘Animal agency, resistance, and escape’, in A. Matsuoka and J. Sorenson (eds), Critical Animal Studies: Towards Trans-species Social Justice, London: Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd, pp. 21–44.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Davis, J. G. ([1975] 2015), Taller Than Trees, Leeds: House of Stratus.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Derrida, J. (2008), The Animal That Therefore I Am (trans. D. Wills), New York: Fordham University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Dhont, K. and Hodson, G. (eds) (2019), Why We Love and Exploit Animals: Bridging Insights from Academia and Advocacy, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Diamond, C. (1991), The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, Boston, MA: MIT Press, pp. 319–34.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Donovan, J. (1990), ‘Animal rights and feminist theory’, Signs, 15:2, pp. 350–75.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Donovan, J. (2011), ‘Aestheticizing animal cruelty’, College Literature, 38:4, pp. 202–17.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Donovan, J. (2016), The Aesthetics of Care: On the Literary Treatment of Animals, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Foucault, M. (1977), Discipline and Punish: Birth of the Prison, New York: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Foucault, M. (1978), The History of Sexuality. Volume 1: An Introduction (trans. R. Hurley), New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Foucault, M. (1982), ‘The subject and power’, Critical Inquiry, 8:4, pp. 777–95.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Foucault, M. (1994), ‘Technologies of the self’, in P. Rabinow (ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 1, New York: The New Press, pp. 223–51.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Foucault, M. (2003), ‘Society Must Be Defended’: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976 (trans. D. Macey), New York: Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ghosh, N. (2022), Blue Sky, White Cloud, New Delhi: Aleph Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gowdy, B. (1998), The White Bone, New York: Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Gruen, S. (2006), Water for Elephants: A Novel, London: Two Roads Books.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gruen, L. (2018), Critical Terms for Animal Studies, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gunawansa, T. D., Perera, K., Apan, A. and Hettiarachchi, N. K. (2023), ‘The human-elephant conflict in Sri Lanka: History and present status’, Biodiversity and Conservation, 32:10, pp. 3025–52, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-023-02650-7.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gupta, S. K., Kumar, A. and Nigam, P. (2011), ‘Multilocus genotyping of Asian elephant ivory: A case study in suspected wildlife crime’, Journal of Forensic Research, 4:1, pp. 1–3.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Herman, D. (2018), Narratology Beyond the Human: Storytelling and Animal Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Holloway, L. (2007), ‘Subjecting cows to robots: Farming technologies and the making of animal subjects’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25:6, pp. 1041–60.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Holloway, L. and Morris, C. (2007), ‘Exploring biopower in the regulation of farm animal bodies: Genetic policy interventions in UK livestock’, Genomics, Society and Policy, 3:2, pp. 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Holloway, L., Morris, C., Gilna, B. and Gibbs, D. (2009), ‘Biopower, genetics and livestock breeding: (Re)constituting animal populations and heterogeneous biosocial collectivities’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34:3, pp. 394–407.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Jacobson, S. L. and Plotnik, J. M. (2020), ‘The importance of sensory perception in an elephant’s cognitive world’, Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 15, pp. 131–48, https://doi.org/10.3819/CCBR.2020.150006.
    [Google Scholar]
42. James, T. (2015), The Tusk That Did the Damage, Haryana: Random House Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
43. König, H. J., Kiffner, C., Kramer-Schadt, S., Fürst, C., Keuling, O. and Ford, A. T. (2020), ‘Human-wildlife coexistence in a changing world’, Conservation Biology, 34:4, pp. 786–94.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Madden, F. (2004), ‘Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: Global perspectives on local efforts to address human-wildlife conflict’, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9:4, pp. 247–57.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Maher, J., Pierpoint, H. and Beirne, P. (eds) (2017), The Palgrave International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Matthee, D ([1984] 2006), Circles in a Forest, New York: Penguin Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Mishra, R. K., Mohammad, N. and Roychoudhury, N. (2015), ‘Elephants: Status, habitat, threat and conservation’, Van Sangyan, 2:9, pp. 1–11, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rajesh-Mishra-26/publication/281445720_Elephants_Status_habitat_threat_and_conservation_On_August_12_2015_World_Elephant_Day/links/55e7ca0008ae3e1218421348/Elephants-Status-habitat-threat-and-conservation-On-August-12-2015-World-Elephant-Day.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Morse, D. D. and Danahay, M. A. (eds) (2017), Victorian Animal Dreams: Representations of Animals in Victorian Literature and Culture, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Murphy, A. V. (2011), ‘Corporeal vulnerability and the new humanism’, Hypatia, 26:3, pp. 575–90.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Nibert, D. (2013), Animal Oppression and Human Violence: Domesecration, Capitalism, and Global Conflict, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Nicholson, C. (2009), The Elephant Keeper, London: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Nixon, R. (2011), Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. O’Key, D. (2022), Creaturely Forms in Contemporary Literature: Narrating the War against Animals, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Ortiz-Robles, M. (2016), Literature and Animal Studies, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Palmer, C. (2001), ‘“Taming the wild profusion of existing things?” A study of Foucault, power and human/animal relationships’, Environmental Ethics, 23:4, pp. 339–58.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Palmer, C. (2003), ‘Colonization, urbanization, and animals’, Philosophy & Geography, 6:1, pp. 47–58.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Palmer, C. (2017), ‘“Taming the wild profusion of existing things?” A study of Foucault, power, and human/animal relationships’, in M. Chrulew and D. J. Wadiwel (eds), Foucault and Animals, Boston, MA: Brill, pp. 107–31.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Philo, C. and Wilbert, C. (2000), Animal Spaces, Beastly Places, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Philp, M. (1983), ‘Foucault on power: A problem in radical translation?’, Political Theory, 11:1, pp. 29–52.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Pick, A. (2011), Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Rabinow, P. (ed.) (1984), The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Rodin, L. (2022), ‘Power and animals: A Foucauldian theme in critical animal studies’, Logos et Praxis, 21:1, pp. 87–96.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Simons, J. (2002), Animal Rights and the Politics of Literary Representation, New York: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Singh, S. K., Jabin, G., Basumatary, T., Bhattarai, G. P., Chandra, K. and Thakur, M. (2019), ‘Resolving the trans-boundary dispute of elephant poaching between India and Nepal’, Forensic Science International: Synergy, 1, pp. 146–50.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Smith, W. ([1991] 2018), Elephant Song, Midrand: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Stretesky, P. B. and Berry, B. (2018), ‘An alternative view of animal abuse: Violence against the environment and all its creatures’, in W. S. DeKeseredy, C. M. Rennison and A. K. Hall-Sanchez (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of Violence Studies, New York: Routledge, pp. 296–308.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Taylor, C. (2008), ‘The precarious lives of animals’, Philosophy Today, 52:1, pp. 60–72.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Taylor, C. (2013), ‘Foucault and critical animal studies: Genealogies of agricultural power’, Philosophy Compass, 8:6, pp. 539–51.
    [Google Scholar]
69. The Economic Times (2023), ‘Why are man-animal battles rising?’, 27 April, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/how-to/why-man-animal-battles-are-rising-wildlife-expert-firoz-sama-explains/articleshow/99767911.cms. Accessed 20 May 2023.
70. Think Wildlife Foundation (2023), ‘Human-wildlife conflict on the rise in Uttarakhand’, 26 May, https://thinkwildlifefoundation.com/human-wildlife-conflict-on-the-rise-in-uttarakhand/#:~:text=Shrinking%20habitat%3A%20The%20primary%20cause,landscapes%20outside%20the%20reserve%20forest. Accessed 26 November 2023.
71. Twine, R. (2010), Animals as Biotechnology: Ethics, Sustainability and Critical Animal Studies, London: Earthscan.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Tyner, J. (2016), Violence in Capitalism: Devaluing Life in an Age of Responsibility, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Von Uexküll, J. (2013), A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Wadiwel, D. J. (2002), ‘Cows and sovereignty: Biopower and animal life’, Borderlands, 1:2, p. 1.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Wadiwel, D. J. (2015), The War against Animals, vol. 3, Boston, MA: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Wafler, L. (2017), ‘“I would prefer not to”: Nonhuman animal resistance and the language of speciesism’, doctoral dissertation, Vancouver: University of British Columbia, https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0404513. Accessed 25 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Webb, S. H. (1998), On God and Dogs: A Christian Theology of Compassion for Animals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Weil, K. (2010), ‘A report on the animal turn’, Differences, 21:2, pp. 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Whitehall, G. (2023), ‘“When they fight back”: A cinematic archive of animal resistance and world wars’, Review of International Studies, 49:2, pp. 278–99.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Xie, C. (2019), ‘Narrating animal suffering in Ye Guangqin’s animal stories’, CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 21:5, pp. 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Žižek, S. (2008), Violence: Six Sideways Reflections, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Foucault, M. (1978), History of Sexuality: An Introduction, New York: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]