Full text loading...
Around November 2019 – the month and year in which Blade Runner ([1982] 2007) is set – the internet was awash in articles asking versions of the same question: ‘Did Blade Runner accurately predict the future?’ Commentators weighed in, assessing the extent to which the future that the film predicted had, in fact, materialized. Similarly, Blade Runner has been hailed as a prophetic film that prescientlyanticipated the world in which we now live, and moreover one that has left an indelible legacy in popular culture. Appealing as such claims may be, establishing their truth is more demanding than some suppose. Once we start inquiring into such issues, other questions concerning a film’s relationship to events that predate and postdate it crowd in as well. How can we tell whether something is amongst a film’s sources? How can we determine what properly belongs to its legacy? This article examines these issues with respect to Blade Runner in particular with the aim of drawing conclusions concerning science fiction films more generally. It argues that prediction is an imposition upon science fiction; anticipations are fundamentally distinct from predictions; veridically attributing ‘sources’ and ‘legacies’ to a film requires the identification of real causal connections; and that Blade Runner's stature as a motion picture is in no need of the extravagant claims that have sometimes been made on its behalf.