Skip to content
1981
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1651-6826
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3801

Abstract

Utilizing scholarship on transnational film, cultural exchange and Turkish film history, this article situates Turkish cinema’s Yeşilçam era of high genre cinema (1950s–80s) as both inventive and resistive to hegemonic western film representation. While often discussed pejoratively, Kristin Thompson’s theory of cinematic excess is applied to discuss how these films achieve a level of ingenuity beyond orientalist notions of quality and good taste. This article also examines how western aid to Turkey in the post-war era and the establishment of national governing film bodies in the early 1950s contributed to a robust, if financially limited, mode of film production specifically designed for Turkish audiences. Two exploitation films of this era, (1974) and (1982), will be closely examined to discuss the subversive and culturally specific strategies of the Yeşilçam era despite, or even because of, its perceived economic and aesthetic limitations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/fint_00259_1
2025-06-18
2026-04-10

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anon. (2022), ‘Yeşilçam remakes of Hollywood’s iconic movies come to London’, Daily Sabah, 6 April, https://www.dailysabah.com/arts/cinema/Ye%C5%9Fil%C3%A7am-remakes-of-hollywoods-iconic-movies-come-to-london. Accessed 17 August 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arslan, Savaş (2006), ‘Projecting a bridge for youth: Islamic “enlightenment” versus westernization in Turkish cinema’, in T. Shary and A. Seibel (eds), Youth Culture in Global Cinema, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, pp. 15772.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arslan, Savaş (2011), Cinema in Turkey: A New Critical History, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhabha, Homi (1984), ‘Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse’, October, 28, Spring, p. 125, https://doi.org/10.2307/778467.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bordwell, David, Thompson, Kristen and Staiger, Janet (1985), The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style & Mode of Production to 1960, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ďurovičová, Nataša (2009), ‘Preface’, in N. Ďurovičová and K. Newman (eds), World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp. ixvx.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Erdoğan, Nezih (2003), ‘Powerless signs: Hybridity and the logic of excess of Turkish trash’, in K. Ross and D. Derman (eds), Mapping the Margins: Identity Politics and the Media, New York: Hampton Press, pp. 16376.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Erdoğan, Nezih and Kaya, Dilek (2002), ‘Institutional intervention in the distribution and exhibition of Hollywood films in Turkey’, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 22:1, pp. 4759, https://doi.org/10.1080/01439680220120282.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ezra, Elizabeth and Rowden, Terry (2010), Transnational Cinema: The Film Reader, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Haynes, Jonathan (2007), ‘“Nollywood”: What’s in a name?’, Film International, 5:4, pp. 10608, https://doi.org/10.1386/fiin.5.4.106.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hjort, Mette (2009), ‘On the plurality of cinematic transnationalism’, in N. Ďurovičová and K. Newman (eds), World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp. 1233.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Krämer, Lucia (2015), ‘The end of the Hollywood “rip-off?” Changes in the Bollywood politics of copyright’, in D. Hassler-Forest and P. Nicklas (eds), The Politics of Adaptation: Media Convergence and Ideology, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 14357.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Krings, Matthias (2015), ‘Black Titanic: Pirating the White Star liner’ in African Appropriations: Cultural Difference, Mimesis, and Media, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 84119.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mathijs, Ernest and Sexton, Jaime (2011), Cult Cinema: An Introduction, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. McCall, John C. (2007), ‘The pan-Africanism we have: Nollywood’s invention of Africa’, Film International, 5:4, pp. 9297, https://doi.org/10.1386/fiin.5.4.92.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Savaseri, Eda (2021), ‘Yeşilçam’s legacy: Lost but not forgotten’, North America TEN, 21 March, https://northamericaten.com/yesilcam-turkish-film-industry/. Accessed 17 August 2023.
  17. Savk, Serkan and Burak, Dogu (2021), ‘Mapping Yeşilçam: A relational approach to the Turkish film industry’, CINEJ Cinema Journal, 9:2, pp. 193230, https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2021.425.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Semege, Mahoro (2021), ‘Cultural specificity and cinematic narration’, Film International, 19:2, pp. 1740, https://doi.org/10.1386/fint_00087_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith, Ian Robert (2018), The Hollywood Meme: Transnational Adaptations in World Cinema, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith, Iain Robert (2021), ‘Remakesploitation: Exploitation film remakes and the transnational Giallo’, in E. Cuelenaere, G. Willems and S. Joye (eds), European Film Remakes, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 7386.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Thompson, Kristen (1977), ‘The concept of cinematic excess’, Cine-Tracts, 1:2, pp. 5464.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/fint_00259_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): excess; exploitation; film; postcolonial; Star Wars; transnational; Turkey
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test