Makavejev’s Neo-Documentarism | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Film Matters
  4. Volume 12, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2042-1869
  • E-ISSN: 2042-1877

Abstract

The depiction of political movements or politicized groups through cinema too often emphasizes their material demands and current social reality, neglecting the subconscious, internal desires of the group. To outline the effectiveness of “neo-documentary” films in portraying collective struggle, this essay will examine Dušan Makavejev’s (1971) which focuses on Wilhelm Reich and the loose movement for sexual liberation inspired by his ideas. This movement had collective subconscious desires and motivations which manifest themselves externally through lifestyle choices, artistic or political actions. The members of the movement also had internal realities, repression, and trauma for example, that they wished to avoid or fight against. For a holistic cinematic representation, both the internal and external realities must be represented, and ultimately synthesized. Matsumoto Toshio’s “neo-documentary” theory solves this problem. “Neo-documentary” is a spiritual successor to surrealism, but with an expanded notion of the internal-external synthesis that the surrealists outlined. Using surrealist techniques to depict internal realities, and documentary form to depict external realities, Matsumoto described a new kind of cinema which would encompass both worlds, destabilizing the boundary between the two.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/fm_00178_1
2021-12-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arthur, Paul.. “ Escape from Freedom: The Films of Dusan Makavejev. .” Cineaste, vol. 27, no. 1, 2001, pp. 11–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker, Jennifer Lynde.. The Aesthetics of Antifascist Film: Radical Projection. Routledge;, 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Beard, Danijela Š.. “ Soft Socialism, Hard Realism: Partisan Song, Parody, and Intertextual Listening in Yugoslav Black Wave Film (1968–1972). .” Twentieth-Century Music, vol. 16, no. 1, 2019, pp. 95–121.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Breton, André.. Surrealism and Painting. Translated by Simon Watson Taylor., Harper & Row;, 1965.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brunius, Jacques.. “ Crossing the Bridge. .” The Shadow and Its Shadow: Surrealist Writings on the Cinema, edited by Paul Hammond., City Lights Books;, 2000, pp. 99–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Inoue, Miyo,, and Aaron Kerner.. “ Imagining Reality as a Set of Chinese Boxes: An Interview with Matsumoto Toshio. .” Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique, vol. 22, no. 4, 2014, pp. 907–930.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Ko, Mika.. “ ‘Neo-documentarism’ in Funeral Parade of Roses: The New Realism of Matsumoto Toshio. .” Screen, vol. 52, no. 3, 2011, pp. 376–390.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Levy, Silvano., ed. Surrealism: Surrealist Visuality. NYU Press;, 1997.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. MacBean, James Roy.. “ Sex and Politics: Wilhelm Reich, World Revolution, and Makavejev’s WR. .” Film Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 3, 1972, pp. 2–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Makavejev, Dušan.. WR: Mysteries of the Organism. Criterion Collection , 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Matsumoto, Toshio.. Funeral Parade of Roses. Art Theatre Guild;, 1969.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Mortimer, Lorraine.. “ Our Carnal Nature and Cosmic Flow. .” The Massachusetts Review, vol. 43, no. 1, 2002, pp. 107–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Parvulescu, Constantin.. “ Betrayed Promises: Politics and Sexual Revolution in the Films of Márta Mészáros, Miloš Forman, and Dušan Makavejev. .” Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, 2009, pp. 77–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Porton, Richard.. “ WR Mysteries of Organism: Anarchist Realism and Critical Quandaries. .” Arena Two, edited by Stuart Christie., Christie Books , 2010, pp. 133–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Reich, Wilhelm.. The Mass Psychology of Fascism. Macmillan;, 1970.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Raine, Michael.. “ A Theory of Avant-Garde Documentary. .” Cinema Journal, vol. 51, no. 4, 2012, pp. 144–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Rubin, Lore Reich,, and William F. Cornell.. “ Wilhelm Reich and the Corruption of Ideals: A Discussion in the Context of Dusan Makavejev’s WR: Mysteries of the Organism. .” USABPJ, vol. 8, no. 1, 2009, pp. 11–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Shaw, Spencer.. Film Consciousness: From Phenomenology to Deleuze. McFarland;, 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Sitton, Robert, et al. “ Fight Power with Spontaneity and Humor: An Interview with Dusan Makavejev. .” Film Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2, 1971, pp. 3–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Thomsen, Christian Braad.. “ ‘Let’s Put the Life Back in Political Life:’ An Interview with Dusan Makavejev. ,” Cinéaste, vol. 6, no. 2, 1974, pp. 14–18.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/fm_00178_1
Loading
Makavejev’s Neo-Documentarism
Film Matters 12, 68 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/fm_00178_1
/content/journals/10.1386/fm_00178_1
/content/journals/10.1386/fm_00178_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): avant-garde; black wave; docufiction; documentary film; surrealism; Yugoslav cinema

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error