Skip to content
1981
Volume 15, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2042-1869
  • E-ISSN: 2042-1877

Abstract

The treatment and reception of female characters in mid-century American cinema has undergone significant scholarly review in previous decades; yet the existence of disabled female characters within film noir remains unacknowledged. Taking (1955) as its case study, this essay unravels the construction, fault lines, function, and symbolism of impairment in the history of early cinema and postwar America. It focuses in on the peculiar positioning of Zofia Machine as a disabled femme fatale—an inherent contradiction within the universe of noir cinema. By reconstructing the historic meanings, ideas, and assumptions, embodied in the imagery of disabled womanhood, the present work introduces the novel archetype and narrative of the crip fatale, occupying a space between existing conceptions of hegemonic femininity and corporeal normalcy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/fm_00334_1
2024-11-30
2025-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. “Ambulatory Wheelchair Users.This Is Me Agency 2 Oct. 2020, https://www.thisismeagency.co.uk/ambulatory-wheelchair-users/. Accessed 5 Sept. 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Benjamin, Walter. Das Kunstwerk Im Zeitalter Seiner Technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Suhrkamp, 1963.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brook, Vincent. Driven to Darkness. Rutgers University Press, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chivers, Sally, and Nicole Markotic´. The Problem Body: Projecting Disability on Film. Ohio State University Press, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics of the American Psychiatric Association. Mental Disorders: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. American Psychiatric Association Mental Hospital Service, 1952.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davidson, Michael. “‘Every Man His Specialty’: Beckett, Disability, and Dependence.Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry, vol. 6, no. 13, 2010, pp. 1327.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fischer, Jens.Kundry, Salome Und Melusine: Verführung Und Erlösung in Der Oper Der Jahrhundwende.Fin de Siècle: Kommentar Zu Einer Epoche. Winkler, 1978, pp. 15976.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Freud, Sigmund. Das Unheimliche. Reclam, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gartner, Alan. Images of the Disabled, Disabling Images. Praeger, 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. The Glass Menagerie. Directed by Irving Rapper, Twentieth Century Fox, 1950.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Good, David F., and Ruth Wodak. From World War to Waldheim. Berghahn Books, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamilton, Elizabeth C.No Longer Unreasonable: Disability in German Cinema.Disability Studies Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 3, 2004, doi:10.18061/dsq.v24i3.503. Accessed 7 October 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayworth, Catherine M. Dames, Darlings, and Detectives: Women, Agency, and the Soundtrack in RKO Radio Pictures Crime Films 1939–1950. 2010. The University of Leeds, PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Herrick, John M., and Paul H. Stuart. “Disability Policy (United States).Encyclopaedia of Social Welfare History in North America, Sage Publications Inc., 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hinchliffe, Alexander. Contamination and Containment: Representing the Pathologised Other in 1950s American Cinema. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Nottingham, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jansson, Bruce S. The Reluctant Welfare State: Engaging History to Advance Social Work Practice in Contemporary Society. 9th ed., Cengage, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jordan, Jessica H. The Sex Goddess in American Film, 1930–1965: Jean Harlow, Mae West, Lana Turner, and Jayne Mansfield. Cambria Press, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Koepnick, Lutz P. The Dark Mirror: German Cinema Between Hitler and Hollywood. University Of California Press, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Linett, Maren T. Bodies of Modernism Physical Disability in Transatlantic Modernist Literature. University of Michigan Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. The Man with the Golden Arm. Directed by Otto Preminger, United Artists, 1955.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Markel, Howard, and Alexandra M. Stern. “The Public Health Service and Film Noir: A Look Back at Elia Kazan’s Panic in the Streets (1950).Public Health Reports, vol. 118, 2003, pp. 178––83.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Markert, John.Attacking the Drug Problem, 1900–1959: Cinema and the Temperance Movement.Hooked in Film: Substance Abuse on the Big Screen, Scarecrow Press Inc., 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McRuer, Robert.In Focus: Cripping Cinema and Media Studies: Introduction.JCMS: Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, vol. 58, no. 4, 2019, pp. 13439, https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2019.0042. Accessed 23 Nov. 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Millard, Chris.Concepts, Diagnosis and the History of Medicine: Historicising Ian Hacking and Munchausen Syndrome.Social History of Medicine, vol. 20, no. 3, Oct. 2016, pp. 8389, https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkw083.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mitchell, David T., and Sharon L. Snyder. Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. University of Michigan Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. The Munchausen Syndrome.Time Magazine, Mar. 1951, https://www.time.com/vault/issue/1951-03-05/page/64/. Accessed 26 July 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Norden, Martin F. The Cinema of Isolation: A History of Physical Disability in the Movies. Rutgers University Press, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Packer, Sharon. Mental Illness in Popular Culture. Praeger, An Imprint of Abc-Clio, Llc, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Poore, Carol. Disability in Twentieth-Century German Culture. University of Michigan Press, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pratley, Gerald. The Cinema of Otto Preminger. London: A. Zwemmer; New York: A. S. Barnes, 1971.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Preminger, Otto. Preminger. Doubleday & Company Inc., 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Prono, Luca. “Whatever Happened to Nelson Algren?: Otto Preminger’s Adaptation of The Man with the Golden Arm.Links & Letters, vol. 6, 1999, pp. 6172.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Robinson, Robert.Don’t Talk to Us of Living Death!Coronet, July 1953, https://www.disabilitymuseum.org/dhm/lib/detail.html?id=1773. Accessed 26 July 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Schillmeier, Michael, and Joshua Eleoma. Edinburgh German Yearbook: Disability in German Literature, Film, and Theater. Camden House, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith, Angela M. Hideous Progeny: Disability, Eugenics, and Classic Horror Cinema. Columbia University Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Stern, A. M.The Public Health Service and Film Noir: A Look Back at Elia Kazan’s Panic in the Streets (1950).Public Health Reports, vol. 118, no. 3, 1 May 2003, pp. 178––83, https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/118.3.178.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Unseld, Melanie. ‘‘Man Töte Dieses Weib!”: Weiblichkeit und Tod. Der Musik Der Jahrhundertwende. J. B. Metzler, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ward, Robert.Imprisonment in Nelson Algren’s The Man with the Golden Arm.The AnaChronisT, vol. 12, no. 1, 2006, pp. 18397.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/fm_00334_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/fm_00334_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test