Skip to content
1981
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2042-1869
  • E-ISSN: 2042-1877

Abstract

In our increasingly urbanized world, wildlife documentaries are a powerful tool to foster emotional connections with nature and influence conservation efforts. Research suggests a correlation between emotional associations with nature and pro-environmental behavior. This article analyzes existing studies on the impact of documentaries, focusing on narration styles, anthropomorphism, and post-viewing resources. Findings indicate that while emotionally engaging documentaries are more likely to foster conservation efforts, balanced approaches are needed to avoid idealized portrayals of nature and incorporating effective calls to action. Documentaries can be powerful tools for fostering conservation, but great attention to their design is crucial to optimize effectiveness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/fm_00402_1
2026-01-31
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. “About WWF-UK.” World Wide Fund for Nature, 8 June 2024, https://www.wwf.org.uk/about. Accessed 16 June 2025.
  2. Aitchison, J., A. Rowan, and D. Fredi. “Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Wildlife Television Programmes.People and Nature, vol. 3, no. 6, 2021, pp. 113846, https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10251.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arendt, F., and J. Matthes. “Nature Documentaries, Connectedness to Nature, and Pro-environmental Behavior.” Environmental Communication, vol. 10, no. 4, 2014, pp. 45372, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.993415.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barbas, T. A., S. Paraskevopoulos, and A. G. Stamou. “The Effect of Nature Documentaries on Students’ Environmental Sensitivity: A Case Study.” Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 34, no. 1, 2009, pp. 6169, https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902759943.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hofman, K., and K. Hughes. “Protecting the Great Barrier Reef: Analysing the Impact of a Conservation Documentary and Post-viewing Strategies on Long-Term Conservation Behaviour.” Environmental Education Research, vol. 24, no. 4, 2017, pp. 52136, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1303820.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Holbert, R. L., N. Kwak, and D. V. Shah. “Environmental Concern, Patterns of Television Viewing, and Pro-environmental Behaviors: Integrating Models of Media Consumption and Effects.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 47, no. 2, 2003, pp. 17796, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4702_2.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Howlett, K., H.-Y. Lee, A. Jaffé, M. Lewis, and E. C. Turner. “Wildlife Documentaries Present a Diverse, but Biased, Portrayal of the Natural World.People and Nature, vol. 5, no. 2, 2023, pp. 63344, https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10431.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones, J. P. G., L. Thomas-Walters, N. A. Rust, and D. Veríssimo. “Nature Documentaries and Saving Nature: Reflections on the New Netflix Series Our Planet.People and Nature, vol. 1, no. 4, 2019, pp. 42025, https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10052.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Our Planet, narrated by David Attenborough, Netflix, 2019–2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Soga, Masashi, et al. “Urban Residents’ Perceptions of Neighborhood Nature: Does the Extinction of Experience Matter?” Biological Conservation, vol. 203, 2016, pp. 14350, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.020.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Somerville, Keith, A. Dickman, P. J. Johnson, and A. G. Hart. “Soap Operas Will Not Wash for Wildlife.People and Nature, vol. 3, no. 6, Mar. 2021, pp. 116065, https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10202.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/fm_00402_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/fm_00402_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test