Sustaining traditional textile art among the Indigenous Nongtluh women of north-eastern India: An interpretative phenomenological analysis

References

1. Aghdaie, S. F. A. and Zardeini, H. Z. (2012), ‘A SWOT analysis of Persian handmade carpet exports’, International Journal of Business and Management, 7:2, pp. 243–51.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anon. (1985), ‘Section 2b’, The Handloom Reservation of Articles for Production Act, http://handlooms.nic.in/writereaddata/UploadFile/Act%201985.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anon. (2017), ‘Sericulture development in north eastern states’, The Northeast Window, 2 December, http://www.thenortheastwindow.com/2017/12/sericulture-development-north-eastern-states/. Accessed 13 June 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Asakitikpi, A. O. (2006), ‘The rise and fall of broadloom weaving among the Yoruba: An historical overview’, Institute of African Studies Research Review, 22:1, pp. 73–81.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Asmah, J. (2010), ‘Stepping outside the box: Traditional knowledge, folklore, indigenous textiles and cultural appropriation – Is there room for folklore protection under intellectual property law?’, master’s thesis, Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Banerjee, A. N., Kotnala, O. P. and Maulik, S. R. (2018), ‘Dyeing of Eri silk with natural dyes in presence of natural mordants’, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 17:2, pp. 396–99.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Berlo, J. C. (1992), ‘Beyond bricolage: Women and aesthetic strategies in Latin American textiles’, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 22:1, pp. 115–34.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bernard, H. R. (2005), Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 4th ed., Oxford: Rowman Altamira.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Béteille, A. (1998), ‘The idea of indigenous people’, Current Anthropology, 39:2, pp. 187–92.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bortamuly, A. B. and Goswami, K. (2015), ‘Determinants of the adoption of modern technology in the handloom industry in Assam’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, Part B, pp. 400–09.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Boruah, R. R. and Kaur, S. (2015), ‘A study on the analysis of the economics of weavers’ cooperative societies in Assam’, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5:1, pp. 1–3.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Campbell, G. (2018), ‘The decline of the Malagasy textile industry, c. 1800–1895’, in P. Machado, S. Fee and G. Campbell (eds), Textile Trades, Consumer Cultures, and the Material Worlds of the Indian Ocean, Palgrave Series in Indian Ocean World Studies, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 313–58.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Caran, K. (2009), ‘Unmasking complexity in the study of motivation: Ethnographic insights from a textile artist’, doctoral dissertation, Fairfax: George Mason University.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Carr, M., Chen, M. A. and Tate, J. (2000), ‘Globalization and home-based workers’, Feminist Economics, 6:3, pp. 123–42.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Carruthers, D. V. (2001), ‘The politics and ecology of indigenous folk art in Mexico’, Human Organization, 60:4, pp. 356–66.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chibnik, M. (2008), ‘Advertising Oaxacan woodcarvings’, Human Organization, 67:4, pp. 362–72.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cohen, E. (1989), ‘The commercialization of ethnic crafts’, Journal of Design History, 2:2&3, pp. 161–68.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Colloredo-Mansfeld, R. (2002), ‘An ethnography of neoliberalism: Understanding competition in artisan economies’, Current Anthropology, 43:1, pp. 113–37.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Colloredo-Mansfeld, R., Antrosio, J. and Jones, E. C. (2011), ‘Creativity, place, and commodities’, in W. E. Little and P. A. McAnany (eds), Textile Economies: Power and Value from the Local to the Transnational, Plymouth: Alta Mira Press, pp. 39–56.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014), Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Daskon, C. D. (2010), ‘Cultural resilience – The roles of cultural traditions in sustaining rural livelihoods: A case study from rural Kandyan villages in central Sri Lanka’, Sustainability, 2:4, pp. 1080–100.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Daya, R., Chivandi, M., Pandey, D. K. and Upadhyaya, A. D. (2013), ‘Factors affecting decision making of tribal women in farming in Meghalaya’, Journal of Global Communication, 6:1, pp. 15–18.
    [Google Scholar]
23. D’Costa, A. (2005), The Long March to Capitalism: Embourgeoisment, Internationalization and Industrial Transformation in India, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Devi, C. V. (2012), ‘Exploring the lives of Manipur’s women weavers’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 19:1, pp. 31–55.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Devi, C. V. (2013), ‘Handlooms for livelihood in north-eastern region: Problems and prospects’, Journal of Rural Development, 32:4, pp. 427–38.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dias, R. M., Ogle, J. P. and Diddi, S. (2020), ‘Constructing cultural identity through weaving among Ri-Bhoi women weavers: A symbolic interactionist approach’, Fashion and Textiles, 7:31, pp. 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dickie, V. A. and Frank, G. (1996), ‘Artisan occupations in the global economy: A conceptual framework’, Journal of Occupational Science, 3:2, pp. 45–55.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Dikshit, K. R. and Dikshit, J. K. (2014), North-east India: Land, People and Economy, Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Eatough, V. and Smith, J. A. (2008), ‘Interpretative phenomenological analysis’, in C. Willig and W. Stainton-Rogers (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, London: Sage Publications, pp. 193–211.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Eerkens, J. W. and Lipo, C. P. (2007), ‘Cultural transmission theory and the archaeological record: Providing context to understanding variation and temporal changes in material culture’, Journal of Archaeological Research, 15:3, pp. 239–74.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Eriksen, T. H. (2004), ‘Keeping the recipe: Norwegian folk costumes and cultural capital’, Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2004:44, pp. 20–34.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Eversole, R. (2005), ‘Challenging the creative class: Innovation, “Creative Regions” and community development’, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 11:3, pp. 351–60.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ferdows, K. (1997), ‘Making the most of foreign factories’, Harvard Business Review, March–April, https://hbr.org/1997/03/making-the-most-of-foreign-factories. Accessed 17 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Flowers, P., Smith, J. A., Sheeran, P. and Beail, N. (1997), ‘Health and romance: Understanding unprotected sex in relationships between gay men’, British Journal of Health Psychology, 2:1, pp. 73–86.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Frederick, S. and Gereffi, G. (2009), Review and Analysis of Protectionist Actions in the Textile and Apparel Industries, Washington, DC and London: World Bank and the Center for Economic Policy Research.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gailangam, K. (1997), ‘Economic changes in Manipur during British rule 1891–1947’, unpublished doctorial dissertation, Manipur: Manipur University.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Ghosh, G. K. and Ghosh, S. (1995), Indian Textiles: Past and Present, New Delhi: APH Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ghouse, S. M. (2012), ‘Indian handicraft industry: Problems and strategies’, International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 2:7, pp. 1183–99.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Goswami, K., Hazarika, B. and Handique, K. (2017), ‘Determinants of financial risk attitude among the handloom micro-entrepreneurs in north east India’, Asia Pacific Management Review, 22:4, pp. 168–75.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Government of India (2010), Handloom Census of India 2009–10: Primary Handloom Census Abstract, New Delhi: Office of the Development Commissioner, https://handlooms.nic.in/Writereaddata/Handloom%20report.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Government of India (2015), Notes on Handloom Sector, New Delhi: Office of the Development Commissioner, https://handlooms.nic.in/writereaddata/2486.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Government of India (2016), Report on Market Research for Promotion of India Handloom Brand, Lucknow: National Handloom Development Corporation, https://handlooms.nic.in/writereaddata/2534.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Government of India (2018), Production of Raw Silk and Silk Yarn – State wise Table-11.1 (B), New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, https://mospi.nic.in/statistical-year-book-india/2018/180. Accessed 24 January 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Government of Meghalaya (2020), ‘About us’, Directorate of Sericulture and Weaving, 20 February, https://megseriloom.gov.in/about_us.html. Accessed 10 June 2020.
45. Grimes, K. M. and Milgram, B. L. (2000), ‘Facing the challenges of artisan production in the global market’, in K. M. Grimes and B. L. Milgram (eds), Artisans and Cooperatives: Developing Alternate Trade for the Global Economy, Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, pp. 3–10.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Herzfeld, M. (2004), The Body Impolitic: Artisans and Artifice in the Global Hierarchy of Value, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hollstein, B. (2011), ‘Qualitative approaches’, in J. Scott and P. J. Carrington (eds), The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 404–16.
    [Google Scholar]
48. IWGAI (2020), The Indigenous World 2020, Copenhagen: The International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, http://iwgia.org/images/yearbook/2020/IWGIA_The_Indigenous_World_2020.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Jackson, S. A. (2000), ‘Joy, fun, and flow state in sport’, in Y. L. Hanin (ed.), Emotions in Sport, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 135–56.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Jentz, J. (1984), ‘Artisan culture and the organization of Chicago’s German workers in the gilded age, 1860 to 1890’, American Studies, 29:2, pp. 133–47.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Jha, S. K., Mishra, S., Sinha, B., Alatalo, J. M. and Pandey, R. (2017), ‘Rural development program in tribal region: A protocol for adaptation and addressing climate change vulnerability’, Journal of Rural Studies, 51, pp. 151–57.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Jongeward, C. (2001), ‘A search for sustainable livelihoods within global marketplaces: Stories of learning, change among rural artisans in Thailand’, Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education, Quebec, Canada, 25–27 May.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Joshi, P. C. (1963), ‘The decline of indigenous handicrafts in Uttar Pradesh’, The Indian Economic and Social History Review, 1:1, pp. 24–35.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Karolia, A. and Ladia, B. (2012), ‘Traditional textiles and costumes of Karbi and Biate tribes of Meghalaya’, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 11:2, pp. 309–16.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Latour, B. and Lépinay, V. (2009), Economics: The Science of Passionate Interests: An Introduction to the Economic Anthropology of Gabriel Tarde, Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Mahon, M., McGrath, B., Laoire, L. O. and Collins, P. (2018), ‘Artists as workers in the rural: Precarious livelihoods, sustaining rural futures’, Journal of Rural Studies, 63, pp. 271–79.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Mamidipudi, A. and Bijker, W. E. (2018), ‘Innovation in Indian handloom weaving’, Technology and Culture, 59:3, pp. 509–45.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Maslow, A. H. (1962), Toward a Psychology of Being, New York: Van Nostrand.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Meerkerk, E. V. N. (2017), ‘Challenging the de-industrialization thesis: Gender and indigenous textile production in Java under Dutch colonial rule, c. 1830–1920’, The Economic History Review, 70:4, pp. 1219–43.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Milford-Lutzker, M. A. (1999), ‘Intersections: Urban and village art in India’, Art Journal, 58:3, pp. 22–30.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Miller, M. E. and Cook-Greuter, S. R. (eds) (2000), Creativity, Spirituality, and Transcendence: Paths to Integrity and Wisdom in the Mature Self, Stamford: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Mukund, K. (1992), ‘Indian textile industry in 17th and 18th centuries: Structure, organisation and responses’, Economic and Political Weekly, 27:38, pp. 2057–65.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Murchison, J. (2010), Ethnography Essentials: Designing, Conducting, and Presenting Your Research, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Niranjana, S. and Vinayan, S. (2001), Report on Growth and Prospects of the Handloom Industry, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.618.9861&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 17 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Ollman, B. (1976), Alienation: Marx’s Conception of Man in a Capitalist Society, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
67. O’Reilly, K. (2008), Key Concepts in Ethnography, London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Parezo, N. (2002), ‘Indigenous art: Creating value and sharing beauty’, in P. J. Deloria and N. Salisbury (eds), A Companion to American Indian History, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 209–33.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Parts, P. K., Rennu, M., Jääts, L., Matsin, A. and Metslang, J. (2011), ‘Developing sustainable heritage-based livelihoods: An initial study of artisans and their crafts in Viljandi county, Estonia’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 17:5, pp. 401–25.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Piegorsch, K. (2009), ‘An ergonomic bench for indigenous weavers’, Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 17:4, pp. 7–11.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Pietkiewicz, I. and Smith, J. A. (2014), ‘A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology’, Psychological Journal, 20:1, pp. 7–14.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Privette, G. (1983), ‘Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45:6, pp. 1361–68.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Prugl, E. (2013), ‘Women and home work’, in N. P. Stromquist (ed.), Women in the Third World: An Encyclopedia of Contemporary Issues, New York: Routledge, pp. 324–31.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Ramswamy, R. and Hmangaihzuali, J. B. (2016), ‘Promotion and distribution of handloom products in tribal clusters in north east India’, IUP Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 13:1, pp. 47–58.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Roy, T. (2002), ‘Acceptance of innovations in early twentieth-century Indian weaving’, The Economic History Review, 55:3, pp. 507–32.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Roy, T. L. (2015), ‘Here’s how the “Make in India” campaign is reviving indigenous fabrics’, The Economic Times, 6 July, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/cons-products/garments-/-textiles/heres-how-the-make-in-india-campaign-is-reviving-indigenous-fabrics/articleshow/47932622.cms. Accessed 1 July 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Schofield-Tomschin, S. and Littrell, M. A. (2001), ‘Textile handcraft guild participation: A conduit to successful aging’, Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 19:2, pp. 41–51.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Scrase, T. J. (2003), ‘Precarious production: Globalisation and artisan labour in the Third World’, Third World Quarterly, 24:3, pp. 449–61.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Seidel, C. L. and Peigler, R. S. (2018), ‘Entomological aspects of sericulture based on Antheraea assamensis and Samia ricini (Saturniidae) in Assam and Meghalaya’, Tropical Lepidoptera Research, 28:1, pp. 13–18.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Setyagung, E., Hani, U., Azzadina, I., Sianipar, C. and Ishii, T. (2013), ‘Preserving cultural heritage: The harmony between art idealism, commercialization, and triple-helix collaboration’, American Journal of Tourism Management, 2:1, pp. 22–28.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Shantz, A., Alfes, K., Bailey, C. and Soane, E. (2015), ‘Drivers and outcomes of work alienation: Reviving a concept’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 24:4, pp. 382–93.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Sharma, T. P. and Borthakur, S. K. (2008), ‘Ethnobotanical observations on Bamboos among Adi tribes in Arunachal Pradesh’, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 7:4, pp. 594–97.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Smith, J. A. (1999), ‘Identity development during the transition to motherhood: An interpretative phenomenological analysis’, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 17:3, pp. 281–99.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P. and Larkin, M. (2009), Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory Method and Research, London: Sage Publication.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Strawn, S. and Littrell, M. A. (2006), ‘Beyond capabilities: A case study of three artisan enterprises in India’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24:3, pp. 207–13.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Suzuki, N. (2005), ‘Effective regional development in developing countries through artisan craft promotion’, doctoral dissertation, Chiba: Chiba University.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Tehrani, J. J. and Collard, M. (2009), ‘On the relationship between interindividual cultural transmission and population-level cultural diversity: A case study of weaving in Iranian tribal populations’, Evolution and Human Behavior, 30:4, pp. 286–300.
    [Google Scholar]
88. UNDPI (United Nations Department of Public Information) (2010), State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, New York: United Nations.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Upadhyay, A. P. and Barman, U. (2013), ‘Identification of problems and formulation of extension strategies for upliftment of women agripreneurship in sericulture: An exploratory study in Garo hills of Meghalaya’, Journal of Academia and Industrial Research, 2:6, pp. 369–73.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Viswanathan, M. and Rosa, J. A. (2007), ‘Product and market development for subsistence marketplaces: Consumption and entrepreneurship beyond literacy and resource barriers’, Advances in International Management, 20:1, pp. 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Viswanathan, M. and Sridharan, S. (2009), ‘From subsistence marketplaces to sustainable marketplaces: A bottom-up perspective on the role of business in poverty alleviation’, Ivey Business Journal, 73:2, pp. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Wilkinson-Weber, C. M. (1997), ‘Skill, dependency, and differentiation: Artisans and agents in the Lucknow embroidery industry’, Ethnology, 36:1, pp. 49–65.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Wolff, N. and Wahab, B. (2001), ‘Learning from craft taxonomies: Development and a Yoruba tradition’, Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor, 3:3, pp. 10–12.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Xaxa, V. (2008), State, Society, and Tribes: Issues in Post-colonial India, New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley.
    [Google Scholar]