Skip to content
1981
Volume 10, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 2050-0726
  • E-ISSN: 2050-0734

Abstract

The norms and systems of the fashion industry tend to support a small class of brands and designers creating fashion while the public takes on the role of passive consumer. The rise of digital fashion and a new sector of ‘digital-only’ fashion brands now provides unique ways for consumers to interact with fashion online, from buying wearables for digital gaming avatars, to wearing a digital dress on social media, to investing in non-fungible tokens (NFTs) – digital assets based on blockchain technology, bought and sold online. Digital-only fashion brands are reimagining the hierarchical relationships between brand and consumer towards one of empowerment and mutual value via decentralized co-design platforms. Such endeavours allow brands to build community and challenge the ownership and authorship conventions in the fashion industry. Co-design has been widely used by fashion brands as a strategy that promotes involvement from the public/consumer in creating customized and made-to-order products and experiences. Using established theories of participatory art, an approach to making art which engages the public and communities in the creative process, this article explores how digital-only fashion brands are creating more participatory models of fashion co-design. To confirm and further explore this theory and to consider how a participatory model is achieved in practice, a qualitative case study was conducted on The Fabricant Studio, a collaborative digital fashion atelier. The findings reveal new methods of co-design used by digital fashion brands that allow consumers to design and monetize their craft while retaining creators’ ownership. The application of the theory also underscores the importance of creative control and decision-making in the fashion co-design process to ensure it is truly participatory vs. interactive. The Fabricant’s methods to educate users through accessible platforms contribute to the diversification of co-designers and digital fashion designers in general.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/fspc_00176_1
2023-09-25
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anon. (n.d.), ‘Participatory art’, Tate Museum, https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/p/participatory-art. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barok, Dušan S. (2009), ‘On participatory art: Interview with Claire Bishop’, Monoskop, 29 July, https://monoskop.org/images/9/99/Barok_Dusan_2009_On_Participatory_Art_Interview_with_Claire_Bishop.pdf. Accessed 12 August 2022.
  3. Bishop, Claire (2006a), ‘The social turn: Collaboration and its discontents’, ArtForum, February, https://www.artforum.com/print/200602/the-social-turn-collaboration-and-its-discontents-10274. Accessed 12 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bishop, Claire (ed.) (2006b), Participation: Documents of Contemporary Art, London and Cambridge, MA: Whitechapel Art Gallery and The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bishop, Claire (2012), Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship, London and New York: Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Black, Sandy (2019), ‘Sustainability and digitalization’, in A. Geczy and V. Karaminas (eds), The End of Fashion: Clothing and Dress in the Age of Globalization, London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, pp. 11332.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brennan, Orla (2021), ‘How JW Anderson’s internet-breaking “Harry Styles Cardigan” Became an NFT’, Another Magazine, 10 December, https://www.anothermag.com/fashion-beauty/13765/jw-anderson-s-viral-harry-styles-cardigan-is-now-an-nft. Accessed 2 September 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Alan S. (2004), The Values Study: Rediscovering the Meaning and Value of Arts Participation, Hartford, CT: Connecticut Commission on Culture and Tourism.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Business of Fashion and McKinsey & Company (2021), ‘The state of fashion 2022’, https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/retail/our%20insights/state%20of%20fashion/2022/the-state-of-fashion-2022.pdf. Accessed 12 August 2022.
  10. Chapman, Jonathan (2005), Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences and Empathy, London: Earthscan.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cramer, Jo (2011), ‘Made to keep: Product longevity through participatory design in fashion’, Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal–Annual Review, 5:5, pp. 43746.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Crook, Lizzie (2021a), ‘The Fabricant Studio allows anyone to become a digital fashion designer’, Dezeen, 3 November, https://www.dezeen.com/2021/11/03/the-fabricant-studio-digital-fashion-dezeen-15/. Accessed 12 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Crook, Lizzie (2021b), ‘Season 0 is the debut fashion collection of The Fabricant Studio’, Dezeen, 3 November, https://www.dezeen.com/2021/11/03/season-0-is-the-debut-fashion-collection-of-the-fabricant-studio/. Accessed 12 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dion, Delphine and Arnould, Eric (2011), ‘Retail luxury strategy: Assembling charisma through art and magic, Journal of Retailing, 87:4, pp. 50220.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dionisio, John D. N., Burns III, Willam G. and Gilbert, Richard (2013), ‘3D virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities’, ACM Computing Surveys, 45:3, pp. 138.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Edelman, Gilad (2021), ‘The father of Web3 wants you to trust less’, Wired, 29 November, https://www.wired.com/story/web3-gavin-wood-interview/. Accessed 18 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Elizarova, Olga, Briselli, Jen and Dowd, Kimberly (2017), ‘Participatory design in practice: What it is, what it isn’t and how it actually works’, UX Magazine, 14 December, https://uxmag.com/articles/participatory-design-in-practice. Accessed 12 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2021), ‘Showing the world that clothing does not need to be physical to exist: The Fabricant’, 23 November, https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-examples/the-fabricant. Accessed 11 August 2022.
  19. The Fabricant (2021), ‘Digital Fashion House 3.0: Decentralized. Immersive. Sustainable’, Medium, 12 October, https://the-fab-ric-ant.medium.com/the-fabricant-91e88b5b6b76. Accessed 2 June 2022.
  20. The Fabricant (2022), ‘The metaverse you want or the metaverse you get? It’s time to choose’, Medium, 8 March, https://the-fab-ric-ant.medium.com/the-metaverse-you-want-or-the-metaverse-you-get-its-time-to-choose-da281b087725. Accessed 12 August 2022.
  21. Fairs, Marcus (2021), ‘“In this future, a kid in Dakar stands as much chance as a kid in Paris” says Amber Slooten’, MSN, 3 November, https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/in-this-future-a-kid-in-dakar-stands-as-much-chance-as-a-kid-in-paris-says-amber-slooten/ar-AAQgVnQ. Accessed 10 August 2022.
  22. Fiore, Ann M., Seung, Eun L. and Kunz, Grace (2004), ‘Individual differences, motivations, and willingness to use a mass customization option for fashion products’, European Journal of Marketing, 38:7, pp. 83549.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fletcher, Kate (2008), Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys, London: Earthscan.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Floryan, Meg (2010), ‘Interactive and participatory art’, Art 21 Magazine, 3 June, http://magazine.art21.org/2010/06/03/interactive-and-participatory-art/#.YrX54e7MJJV. Accessed 12 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Friedman, Vanessa (2022), ‘What to wear in the metaverse’, New York Times, 24 January, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/20/style/metaverse-fashion.html. Accessed 28 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hackl, Kathy (2021), ‘What are DAOs and why you should pay attention’, Forbes, 1 June, https://www.forbes.com/sites/cathyhackl/2021/06/01/what-are-daos-and-why-you-should-pay-attention. Accessed 12 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hyysalo, Sampsa, Jensen, Torben E. and Oudshoorn, Nelly (2016), The New Production of Users: Changing Innovation Collectives and Involvement Strategies, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hyysalo, Virve and Hyysalo, Sampsa (2018), ‘The mundane and strategic work in collaborative design’, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Design Issues, 34:3, pp. 4258.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jhanji, Yamini (2018), ‘Computer-aided design–garment designing and patternmaking’, in N. Rajkishore and R. Padhye (eds), Automation in Garment Manufacturing, Duxford: Woodhead Publishing, pp. 25390.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Joy, Annamma, Zhu, Ying, Peña, Camilo and Brouard, Myriam (2022), ‘Digital future of luxury brands: Metaverse, digital fashion, and non-fungible tokens’, Strategic Change, 31:3, pp. 33743.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kozinets, Robert V., Dolbec, Pierre-Yann and Earley, Amanda (2014), ‘Netnographic analysis: Understanding culture through social media data’, in U. Flick (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 26275.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Larosse, Michaela (2022), Zoom interview with Emily Huggard, 28 April.
  33. Leadbeater, Charles (2009), We-Think: Mass Innovation, Not Mass Production, London: Profile Books Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McDowell, Maghan (2020), ‘Fashion brands embrace 3D design’, Vogue Business, 28 April, https://www.voguebusiness.com/technology/fashion-brands-embrace-3ddesign. Accessed 29 April 2022.
  35. McDowell, Maghan (2022a), ‘How Discord became the “Soho House of Web 3.0”’, Vogue Business, 25 January, https://www.voguebusiness.com/technology/how-discord-became-the-soho-house-of-web-30. Accessed 12 August 2022.
  36. McDowell, Maghan (2022b), ‘Nike unveils “Dot Swoosh” platform to house Web3 projects’, Vogue Business, 14 November, https://www.voguebusiness.com/technology/nike-unveils-dot-swoosh-platform-to-house-web3-projects/amp. Accessed 9 January 2023.
  37. Meek, Stephanie, Ogilvie, Madeleine, Lambert, Claire and Ryan, Maria M. (2019), ‘Contextualising social capital in online brand communities’, Journal of Brand Management, 26:4, pp. 42644.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Milevska, Suzana (2006), ‘Participatory art: A paradigm shift from objects to subjects’, Eurozine, 2 June, https://www.eurozine.com/participatory-art. Accessed 12 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mitchell, Claudia, De Lange, Naydene and Moletsane, Relebohile (2018), Participatory Visual Methodologies: Social Change, Community and Policy, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Nayak, Rajkishore, Padhye, Rajiv, Wang, Lijing, Chatterjee, Kaleshnath and Gupta, Sheetal (2015), ‘The role of mass customisation in the apparel industry’, International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 8:2, pp. 16272.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Novak-Leonard, Jennifer L. and Brown, WolfBrown, Alan S. (2011), ‘Beyond attendance: A multi-modal understanding of arts participation’, National Endowment for the Arts, February, https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/2008-SPPA-BeyondAttendance.pdf. Accessed 12 August 2022.
  42. Payne, Adrian, Storbacka, Kaj, Frow, Pennie and Knox, Simon (2009), ‘Co-creating brands: Diagnosing and designing the relationship experience’, Journal of Business Research, 62:3, pp. 37989.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Peterson, Joel (2016), ‘The co-design process in mass customization of complete garment knitted fashion products’, Journal of Textile, Science & Engineering, 6:5, pp. 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, Venkat (2004), ‘Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation’, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18:3, pp. 514.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Ramaswamy, Venkat and Ozcan, Kerimkan (2018), ‘What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation’, Journal of Business Research, 84, pp. 196205.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N. and Stappers, Pieter J. (2008), ‘Co-creation and the new landscapes of design’, CoDesign, 4:1, pp. 518.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Särmäkari, Natalia (2018), ‘An exploratory literature review on the types of clothing co-design approaches’, working paper, Espoo: Aalto University, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28281.75364.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Särmäkari, Natalia (2021), ‘Digital 3D fashion designers: Cases of Atacac and The Fabricant’, Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body and Culture, online first, https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2021.1981657.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Särmäkari, Natalia (2022), ‘From a tool to a culture: Authorship and professionalism of fashion 4.0 designers in contemporary digital environments’, doctoral thesis, Espoo: Aalto University.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Särmäkari, Natalia and Vänskä, Annamari (2020), ‘Open-source philosophy in fashion design: Contesting authorship conventions and professionalism’, in B. Stella, C. Ming and C. Rebecca (eds), Proceedings of Synergy: DRS International Conference 2020, online, 11–14 August, Brisbane: Design Research Society, pp. 241026, https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2020.195.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Solá-Santiago, Frances (2022), ‘Digital fashion is booming – here’s how to shop it’, Refinery29, 29 April, https://tinyurl.com/42xcyptz. Accessed 1 May 2022.
  52. Solis, Brian (2022), ‘Reimagining customer experiences in the next web: What are the big questions brands should ask to create value in Web3?’, Forbes, 28 July, https://shorturl.at/blp26. Accessed 4 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Spahiu, Tatjana, Shehi, Ermira and Piperi, Erald (2015), ‘Personalized avatars for virtual garment design and simulation’, International Journal of Education, Science, Technology, Innovation, Health and Environment, 1:3, pp. 5663.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sundararajan, Arun (2022), ‘How your brand should use NFTs’, Harvard Business Review, 28 February, https://hbr.org/2022/02/how-your-brand-should-use-nfts. Accessed 18 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Ulrich, Pamela V., Anderson-Connell, Lenda J. and Wu, Weifang (2003), ‘Consumer co-design of apparel for mass customization’, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7:4, pp. 398412.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Veselova, Emīlija and Gaziulusoy, İdil (2022), ‘Bioinclusive collaborative and participatory design: A conceptual framework and a research agenda’, Design and Culture, 14:2, pp. 14983.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. von Busch, Otto (2008), ‘Fashion-able: Hacktivism and engaged fashion design’, Ph.D. thesis, Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Yin, Robert K. (2018), Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed., Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/fspc_00176_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/fspc_00176_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error