Skip to content
1981
Diaspora, Rethinking Praxis and Theory in Communication for Development
  • ISSN: 2632-5853
  • E-ISSN: 2632-5861

Abstract

Diaspora networks constitute an important resource for ethnic minority groups that seek greater recognition and representation in development and social change. However, for local development NGOs, mobilizing communication for development (C4D) to support these connections is often historically, politically and socially complex. In this article we offer the concept of communicative sovereignty as a C4D framework that local NGOs can use to help ethnic minorities achieve greater recognition and representation. We illustrate the utility of this concept through analysis of the Vietnamese NGO iSEE, which formed the Tien Phong network for the voices of ethnic minority groups, and has carried out various projects to support their efforts. We conclude that despite digital connectivity and extensive social networks, there are often significant communicative and cultural barriers to mobilizing diasporas for development, and addressing these requires historically situated analysis.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/gdm_00046_1
2026-01-24
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bauder, H. and Mueller, R. (2021), ‘Westphalian vs. Indigenous sovereignty: Challenging colonial territorial governance’, Geopolitics, 28:1, pp. 156–73, https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1920577.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyle, M. and Kitchin, R. (2014), ‘Diaspora-centred development: Current practice, critical commentaries, and research priorities’, in S. Sahoo and B. K. Pattanaik (eds), Global Diasporas and Development: Socioeconomic, Cultural, and Policy Perspectives, New Delhi: Springer, pp. 17–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bui, T. H., Nguyen, B. T., Nguyen, C. B., Nguyen, T. K., Hoang, H. T. and Vu, L. P. (2021), Figures on Ethnic Minority Women & Men in Vietnam, 2015–2019, Hanoi: UN Women.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cattien, J. and Stopford, R. (2023), ‘The appropriating subject: Cultural appreciation, property and entitlement’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 49:9, pp. 1061–78, https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537211059515.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cha, D. (2003), Hmong American Concepts of Health, New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203488034.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Chính phủ (n.d.), ‘Nghị định số 58/2022/NĐ-CP của’, Chính phủ: Về đăng ký và quản lý hoạt động của các tổ chức phi chính phủ nước ngoài tại Việt Nam, http://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=206483. Accessed 30 September 2024.
  7. Dang, H. (2012), ‘Vietnam: A widening poverty gap for ethnic minorities’, in G. Hall and H. Patrinos (eds), Indigenous Peoples, Poverty and Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 304–43, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2346307.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Dutta, M. J. (2011), Communicating Social Change: Structure, Culture, and Agency, New York: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Fraser, N. (1995), ‘From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “post-socialist” age’, New Left Review, 212, pp. 68–93, https://doi.org/10.64590/4rl.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fraser, N. (1997), Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, New York: Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Fraser, N. (2000), ‘Rethinking recognition’, New Left Review, 3, pp. 107–20, https://doi.org/10.64590/pup.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fraser, N., Dahl, H. M., Stoltz, P. and Willig, R. (2004), ‘Recognition, redistribution, and representation in capitalist global society: An interview with Nancy Fraser’, Acta Sociologica, 47:4, pp. 374–82, https://doi.org/10.1177/000169930404867.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Giang, N. (2021), Final Evaluation Report Project I believe I can: Period of 1 August 2020–31 December 2021, Hanoi: Institute for Studies of Society, Economics and Environment (iSEE).
     [Google Scholar]
  14. H. (2024), personal communication with A.-B. Tran, Binh Thuan Province, Vietnam, 25 July.
  15. Hein, J. (2013), ‘The double diaspora: China and Laos in the folklore of Hmong American refugees’, in M. E. Pfeifer, M. Chiu and K. Yang (eds), Diversity in Diaspora: Hmong Americans in the Twenty-First Century, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 209–32, https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824835972.003.0009.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoang, T. (2007), ‘Consistently pursuing the socialist orientation in developing the market economy in Vietnam’, Tap chi cong san dien tu, 18 April, https://web.archive.org/web/20110510005305/http://www.tapchicongsan.org.vn/details_e.asp?Object=29152838&News_ID=18459436. Accessed 10 May 2011.
  17. Imai, K. S., Gaiha, R. and Kang, W. (2011), ‘Poverty, inequality and ethnic minorities in Vietnam’, International Review of Applied Economics, 25:3, pp. 249–82, https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2010.483471.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Institute for Studies of Society, Economy, and Environment (iSEE) (2021), Co-Authoring Development: Lessons from a Decade-Long Journey of Working with Ethnic Minority Communities in Vietnam, Hanoi: iSEE, https://www.isee.org.vn/thu-vien/dong-hanh-phat-trien. Accessed 30 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Institute for Studies of Society, Economy, and Environment (iSEE) (2022), Facebook, 1 September, https://www.facebook.com/iseevn/posts/pfbid02YzNGY57pnPEedRTF97yayGnnHRbDF9bBRr3gie5EFHz9g4K2QHmpKAcHDo6pFBYKl. Accessed 30 September 2024.
  20. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA) (n.d.), Indigenous Peoples in Vietnam, Copenhagen: IWGIA, https://www.iwgia.org/en/vietnam.html. Accessed 30 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Keck, M. E. and Sikkink, K. (1998), Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Khalidi, R. (2023), ‘Poverty reduction in comparative perspective: Lessons for Vietnam from international experience’, Reference information on the implementation of the National Target Programme on Sustainable Poverty Reduction for the 2021–2025 period, National Assemblies Bulletin, Issue No. 02/2023, https://www.undp.org/vietnam/publications/poverty-reduction-comparative-perspective-lessons-viet-nam-international-experience. Accessed 27 November 2025.
  23. Khang, T. (2023), ‘Attitudes of Hmong women towards domestic violence and divorce from an interdisciplinary perspective’, BA thesis, Ho Chi Minh City: Fulbright University Vietnam.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, S. (2021), ‘Traditionally transnational: Cultural continuity and change in Hmong shamanism across the diaspora’, Ethnography, 22:1, pp. 51–69, https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138119839086.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, S. (2024), Reclaiming Diasporic Identity: Transnational Continuity and National Fragmentation in the Hmong Diaspora, Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Martín Barbero, J. (1993), Communication, Culture and Hegemony: From the Media to Mediations, London: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. McCargo, D. (2002), Reforming Thai Politics, Copenhagen: NAIS Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Migration Data Portal (2020), ‘Diasporas’, Migration Data Portal, 9 June, https://www.migrationdataportal.org/themes/diasporas. Accessed 30 September 2024.
  29. Nguyen, H., Kompas, T., Breusch, T. and Ward, M. B. (2017), ‘Language, mixed communes, and infrastructure: Sources of inequality and ethnic minorities in Vietnam’, World Development, 96:C, pp. 145–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.004.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Nguyen, M. (2018), ‘Vietnam’s “socialization” policy and the moral subject in a privatizing economy’, Economy and Society, 47:4, pp. 627–47, https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2018.1544397.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Nguyen, N. (2024a), ‘Vietnamese diasporas: An introduction’, in N. Nguyen (ed.), Routledge Handbook of the Vietnamese Diaspora, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Nguyen, T. (2024b), ‘Particularity in commonality: Sense of ethnic and citizenship identities among minority youth in Vietnam’, Identities, 31:2, pp. 161–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2023.2218197.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Nørlund, I. (2007), ‘Civil society in Vietnam: Social organisations, and approaches to new concepts’, ASIEN, 105, pp. 68–90, https://doi.org/10.11588/asien.2007.105.15251.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Open Development Vietnam (2019), ‘Ethnic minorities and indigenous people’, Open Development Vietnam, 30 March, https://vietnam.opendevelopmentmekong.net/topics/ethnic-minorities-and-indigenous-people/. Accessed 30 September 2024.
  35. Phu, B. T. (2006), ‘The Cham Bani of Vietnam’, American Journal of Islam and Society, 23:3, pp. 126–33, https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v23i3.1611.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. R. (2024), personal communication with A.-B. Tran, Ninh Thuan Province, Vietnam, 26 July.
  37. Reilly, K. (2025), ‘Communicative sovereignty’, in A. Nai, M. Grömping and D. Wirz (eds), Elgar Encyclopedia of Political Communication, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 231–4.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Rios, M. and Watkins, J. (2015), ‘Beyond “Place”: Translocal placemaking of the Hmong diaspora’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35:2, pp. 209–19, https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x14568023.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Rodriguez, C. and El Gazi, J. (2007), ‘The poetics of indigenous radio in Colombia’, Media, Culture and Society, 29:3, pp. 449–68, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707076185.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Salazar, J. (2010), ‘Indigenous peoples and the cultural constructions of information and communication technology (ICT) in Latin America’, in L. E. Dyson, M. Hendriks and S. Grant (eds), Indigenous People and Information Technology, Hershey, PA: Idea Book Publishing, pp. 14–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Salemink, O. (2006), ‘Translating, interpreting, and practicing civil society in Vietnam: A tale of calculated misunderstandings’, in L. David and M. David (eds), Development Brokers and Translators: The Ethnography of Aid and Agencies, Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, pp. 101–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Sara (2017), ‘Ganap Mong 11’, Inrasara, 20 August, https://web.archive.org/web/20200128044437/https://inrasara.com/2017/08/20/ganap-mong-11/. Accessed 30 September 2024.
  43. Sari, B. R. (2017), ‘Transnational migration and ethnic entrepreneurship among the Cham diaspora in Malaysia’, Jurnal Kajian Wilayah, 8:1, p. 1, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328604263_TRANSNATIONAL_MIGRATION_AND_ETHNIC_ENTREPRENEURSHIP_AMONG_THE_CHAM_DIASPORA_IN_MALAYSIA. Accessed 30 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sen, A. (1999), Development as Freedom, Toronto: Random House of Canada Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Shuval, J. (2000), ‘Diaspora migration: Definitional ambiguities and a theoretical paradigm’, International Migration, 38:5, pp. 41–56, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00127.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Tan, N. and Preece, C. (2021), ‘Ethnic quotas, political representation and equity in Asia Pacific’, Representation, 58:3, pp. 347–71, https://doi-org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1080/00344893.2021.1989712.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Tan, R. (2024), ‘August 14: As Vietnam tightens leash on criticism, scores are jailed and exiled’, Washington Post, 14 August, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/08/14/vietnam-human-rights-crackdown/. Accessed 30 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Thayer, C. A. (2009), ‘Vietnam and the challenge of political civil society’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 31:1, pp. 1–27, https://www.jstor.org/stable/41288787. Accessed 30 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Tran, A. (2015), ‘Weaving life across borders: Transnational networking among the Cham diaspora in Cambodia, Vietnam, and Malaysia’, in L. K. Fee, M. Rahman and Y. bin Alas (eds), International Migration in Southeast Asia: Continuities and Discontinuities, Singapore: Springer, pp. 13–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Tuyen, T. (2016), ‘Income sources and inequality among ethnic minorities in the northwest region, Vietnam’, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18:4, pp. 1239–54, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9700-8.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2006), The Emerging Civil Society: An Initial Assessment of Civil Society in Viet Nam, United Nations Development Program, 19 June, https://www.undp.org/vietnam/publications/emerging-civil-society-initial-assessment-civil-society-viet-nam. Accessed 30 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Vang, C. (2019), Fly until You Die: An Oral History of Hmong Pilots in the Vietnam War, New York: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190622145.001.0001.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Viễn, S. and Lâm, S. (2017), ‘Người Pa Cô cũng kiến nghị’, Tuổi Trẻ Online, 23 August, https://tuoitre.vn/nguoi-pa-co-cung-kien-nghi-1373512.htm. Accessed 30 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Vương, D. (2016), Kinh tế và xã hội của người Hmông ở Việt Nam: Truyền thống và hiện tại, Ho Chi Mingh City: Social Sciences Publishing House.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. X. (2024), personal communication with A.-B. Tran, Hanoi City, Vietnam, 16 August.
  56. Fraser, N. (1998), ‘Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, participation’, WZB Discussion Paper No. FS I 98-108, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/44061/1/269802959.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Mai, B. (2023), ‘Identity and religion among the contemporary Cham Ahiér in Vietnam’, Ph.D. thesis, Montreal: Concordia University.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Research Center for Human Rights in Ethnic Minorities and Mountainous Areas (2019), ‘Population and distribution of ethnic minorities in Vietnam’, OD Mekong Datahub, 22 November, https://data.vietnam.opendevelopmentmekong.net/en/dataset/population-and-distribution-of-ethnic-minorities-in-vietnam. Accessed 30 September 2024.
  59. Sari, B. R. (2019), ‘Contesting religious beliefs: The experience of the Cham in Vietnam’, International Journal of Interreligious and Intercultural Studies, 2:2, pp. 25–41, https://doi.org/10.32795/ijiis.vol2.iss2.2019.449.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/gdm_00046_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): communication for development (C4D); communicative justice; recognition; redistribution; representation; Tien Phong

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test