Ciphers, ‘hoods and digital DIY studios in India: Negotiating aspirational individuality and hip hop collectivity | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Global Hip Hop Studies
  4. Volume 1, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 1 Number 1
  • ISSN: 2632-6825
  • E-ISSN: 2632-6833
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

This article argues for an attention to the DIY digital studio as a key site where aspiring hip hop MCs in the contemporary moment negotiate between their desire for individual success and their commitments to various forms of local belonging, not least which includes staying true to a hip hop ethos of collectivity. We follow Sonal, a b-boy and MC we worked with in a studio that we set up in Delhi, India in 2013 to work with aspiring MCs in the city’s scene. We trace his subsequent rise to fame in India to argue for an attention to the DIY studio as the material and metaphoric realization of the digital infrastructures of global capitalism. The studio manifests economic and social opportunities for young men like Sonal in Delhi, and, we suspect, for young people across the world who now have access to social media and inexpensive production hardware and software. Yet, in creating opportunities for individual economic and social uplift, the studio poses a threat to the ideal of a hip hop community that undergirds its possibility even as it opens up opportunities to enunciate commitments to other forms of belonging.

© 2020 The Author(s) Published by Intellect Ltd
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC), which allows users to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the article, as long as the author is attributed and the article is not used for commercial purposes. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ghhs_00003_1
2023-01-16
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ghhs/1/1/ghhs.1.1.25_Dattatreyan.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/ghhs_00003_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Akhtar, Zoya. ( 2019), Gully Boy, India:: Excel Entertainment;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alim, H. Samy. ( 2006), Roc the Mic Right: The Language of Hip Hop Culture, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Dattatreyan, Ethiraj Gabriel. ( 2017;), ‘ Small frame politics. ’, in S. Udupa, and S. D. McDowell. (eds), Media as Politics in South Asia, London:: Routledge;, pp. 21–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Dattatreyan, Ethiraj Gabriel. ( forthcoming), The Globally Familiar: Digital Hip Hop, Masculinity, and Urban Space in Delhi, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Flores, Juan. ( 2004;), ‘ Puerto rocks: Rap, roots, and amnesia. ’, in M. Forman, and M. A. Neal. (eds), That’s the Joint! The Hip-Hop Studies Reader, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 69–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Forman, Murray. ( 2002), The ‘Hood Comes First: Race, Space, and Place in Rap and Hip-Hop, Middletown, CT:: Wesleyan University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Harrison, Anthony Kwame. ( 2009), Hip Hop Underground: The Integrity and Ethics of Racial Identification, Philadelphia, PA:: Temple University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Harvey, David. ( 2008;), ‘ The right to the city. ’, New Left Review, 53, pp. 23–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones, Nasir. ( 2015;), ‘ Nas presents the real hip-hop. ’, The Guardian, 21 May, https://www.theguardian.com/news/video/2015/may/21/nas-shake-dust-real-hip-hop-video. Accessed 8 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaur, Ravinder. ( 2007), Since 1947: Partition Narratives among Punjabi Migrants in Delhi, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Lowe, Richard, and Torgoff, Martin. ( 2012), Planet Rock: The Story of Hip Hop and the Crack Generation, UK:: Prodigious Media;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Marwick, Alice E.. ( 2015;), ‘ Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. ’, Public Culture, 27:1, pp. 137–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Mukherjee, Rahul. ( 2019;), ‘ Jio sparks disruption 2.0: Infrastructural imaginaries and platform ecosystems in “digital India”. ’, Media, Culture and Society, 41:2, pp. 175–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Newman, Michael. ( 2005;), ‘ Rap as literacy: A genre analysis of hip-hop ciphers. ’, Text, 25:3, pp. 399–436.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Osumare, Halifu. ( 2001;), ‘ Beat streets in the global hood: Connective marginalities of the hip hop globe. ’, Journal of American and Comparative Cultures, 24:1&2, pp. 171–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Pennycook, Alastair. ( 2007;), ‘ Language, localization, and the real: Hip-hop and the global spread of authenticity. ’, Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 6:2, pp. 101–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Rollefson, Griff. ( 2017), Flip the Script: European Hip Hop and the Politics of Postcoloniality, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Roy, Ananya. ( 2010), Poverty Capital: Microfinance and the Making of Development, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Roy, Ananya. ( 2011;), ‘ Postcolonial urbanism: speed, hysteria, mass dreams. ’, in A. Ong, and A. Roy. (eds), Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, Chichester:: Wiley-Blackwell;, pp. 307–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Singh, Jaspal Naveel, and Dattatreyan, Ethiraj Gabriel. ( 2016;), ‘ Cultural interventions: Repositioning hip hop education in India. ’, Linguistics and Education, 36, pp. 55–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith, Christopher Holmes. ( 2003;) ‘ “I don’t like to dream about getting paid”: Representations of social mobility and the emergence of the hip-hop mogul. ’, Social Text, 21:4, pp. 69–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Spady, James G.,, Alim, H. Samy, and Meghelli, Samir. ( 2006), Tha Global Cipha: Hip Hop Culture and Consciousness, Philadelphia:: Black History Museum Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Tatla, Darshan S.. ( 2006;) ‘ The morning after: Trauma, memory and the Sikh predicament since 1984. ’, Sikh Formations. Religion, Culture, Theory, 2:1, pp. 57–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Toop, David. ( 1991), Rap Attack 2: From African Jive to Global Hip Hop, London:: Serpent’s Tail;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Wilson, Michael John. ( 2011;), ‘ “Making space, pushing time”: A Sudanese hip-hop group and their wardrobe-recording studio. ’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 15:1, pp. 47–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Dattatreyan, Ethiraj Gabriel, and Singh, Jaspal Naveel. ( 2020;), ‘ Ciphers, ‘hoods and digital DIY studios in India: Negotiating aspirational individuality and hip hop collectivity. ’, Global Hip Hop Studies, 1:1, pp. 25–45, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/ghhs_00003_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ghhs_00003_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): cipher; DIY; India; MC; mediatization; studio; subjectivity

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error